June 13, 2010

Changes in sex offender laws means fewer restrictions for some, more for others

Leave it to the media to make things more confusing, the law does not speak of "when a person was arrested" or "crimes committed before 2003," The law is based on when the offender was "convicted." (See HB 571 "convictions occurring" ... The odd part of the new bill relates to "July 1 2008" where it switches to "if the act was committed on or after July 1 2008" ...) (The bill then gets weirder with "acts occurring between July 1 2006 and July 1 2008" which then must be read as 'if one is convicted of an act occurring between 7-1-2006 and 7-1-2008. Were lawmakers drunk when they wrote this?) One would think law enforcement's "Matrix" would show those technicalities, but they too omit them. Always confusing the public. However, with that said the bill does say "knowingly violates" and that will get many acquitted of charges. I always say, if it takes a few lawyers and a judge or two to make sense of a law, then the defendant is innocent!
6-13-2010 Georgia:

The process of tracking and registering sex offenders in Floyd County has become both frustrating and confusing, said Cpl. Ron Morris with the Floyd County Sheriff’s Office.

“We have to go to the books and figure out what laws and what restrictions must be placed on each individual,” Morris said.

According to Morris, 81 percent of all registered sex offenders living in Floyd County have no restrictions placed on where they can be, largely because of changes in state law.

“Floyd County is going to see a huge number of sex offenders in the community with zero proximity restrictions. They can live directly across from a church or across from a day care and there are absolutely no restrictions at all,” Morris said.

The passage of several new state laws changes some of the restrictions put on convicted sex offenders, including where offenders live and work. The new guidelines are often referred to as the Sex Offender Matrix.

Law enforcement now use a proximity restrictions worksheet to help identify whether or not an offender is breaking the law.

Offenders arrested for crimes committed before June 4, 2003, have no proximity restrictions, but notify the sheriff’s office if they change jobs or move within 72 hours of any changes.

Those arrested on or after July 1, 2008, have the most residency restrictions and cannot live within 1000 feet of public and private preschool facilities, churches, schools and libraries.

Both Morris and Lt. Mark Blanton spend the majority of their work week making sure not only that the offenders abide by the law, but that the officers themselves are placing the proper restrictions on offenders.

However, while laws restrict where an offender can live, they don’t prevent an offender from moving into a community where families also live. Morris and Blanton said they often receive panic calls from community members concerned that an offender has moved in next door.

“There is nothing we can do. They have these rights,” said Morris.

“There is nothing that says they can’t attend school functions or ball game, as long as they are doing something any reasonable and prudent person would do,” Blanton added.

Often, Blanton said, concerned citizens are confusing sex offenders with sex predators. Floyd County only has three listed “predators” and two of them are behind bars, Morris said. ..Source.. Lydia Senn

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I have seen several news articles saying this, and also the Southern Center for Human Rights:

http://www.schr.org/safety/registry

But, the actual HB-571 doesn't jive with what the news media and SCHR is saying, so who is right?

http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/sum/hb571.htm

If what they are saying is right, that is great, for me anyway.