October 23, 2017
Registered sex offender who escaped Fort Worth halfway house found dead in South Carolina
A wanted sex offender who escaped from a Fort Worth halfway house earlier this month was found dead in South Carolina on Saturday.
Police believe Brent Allen Jozefkowicz died from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound Saturday morning in Myrtle Beach, said Lonny Haschel, a Department of Public Safety spokesman.
Haschel said officers also arrested four people suspected of helping Jozefkowicz escape on Aug. 4.
DPS, along with several agencies, arrested Jon Ryan Evans, 45, Teresa Kaye Shook, 51, Russell Wayne Shoot, 54, and Paula Pedigo, 45, accusing them of hindering apprehension, a third-degree felony. ..Source..
October 4, 2017
Corrections officials regain control of McCormick prison dorm
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Authorities were still investigating Wednesday how several inmates got to the top of a dorm room at a maximum-security prison in South Carolina.
Department of Corrections spokesman Jeff Taillon told The Associated Press that a handful inmates climbed on top of a dorm at McCormick Correctional Institution, about 85 miles west of Columbia. According to Taillon, officials didn’t see the ascent as a serious escape attempt, because the inmates would have had to get through at least three fences topped with razor wire to get to freedom.
The Department of Corrections said on Twitter that the dorm had been secured as of 9 p.m. Wednesday night.
McCormick County Sheriff Clarke Starnes said no inmates have escaped Wednesday from McCormick Correctional Institution and no injuries have been reported so far. Starnes said firefighters were called, but have been asked to stay outside until it is safe. ..Source..
December 22, 2016
Porn block on new PCs to ‘fight trafficking’ – unless you pay $20
Proposing a bill that requires computers sold in a state to block access to online porn on the grounds that it “would be another way to fight human trafficking” is an interesting approach to crime prevention. That’s what Bill Chumley, Republican state representative, is suggesting in South Carolina.
But if you’re an adult who might want to enjoy legal adult entertainment in the privacy of your own home, you can, under the provisions of the bill, pay a $20 fee to remove that lock.
Outwardly, Chumley’s Human Trafficking Prevention Act resembles morally intentioned ransomware that would be a pain in the neck to administer but easy to bypass.
If the bill became law, every computer sold in the state capable of accessing the internet (ie all new computers) would by default have to “install and operate a digital blocking capability that renders obscenity inaccessible”. It’s not clear how software blocking would filter pornography from other content, although large social media sites would be exempt.
Buyers over the age of 18, sellers and manufacturers could have the blocking deactivated for a one-off fee.
Chumley explained the scheme: “If we could have manufacturers install filters that would be shipped to South Carolina, then anything that children have access on for pornography would be blocked. We felt like that would be another way to fight human trafficking.”
It seems unkind to point out the bill’s flaws, although they are numerous. ..Continued.. by John E Dunn
May 25, 2015
Columbia lawmaker pushes for juvenile sex offender registry reform
5-25-15 South Carolina:
COLUMBIA — A South Carolina lawmaker is on a mission to change the way the state treats juvenile sex offenders.
House Minority Leader Rep. Todd Rutherford, D-Columbia, has introduced a bill that would allow teens who have been convicted of any sex offense and have been placed on the offenders registry to petition the courts to remove their names once they turn 21.
The bill stands little chance of becoming law this year with just six days left in the legislative session. But its potential for passing next year would be “absolutely huge” and a “sea change” in the way South Carolina does things, Rutherford said.
“We’ve got to reform our juvenile justice system in South Carolina,” said Rutherford, who added that the sex offender registry is one of his biggest frustrations with the system. “We are condemning people on that registry to a life of nothing.”
Under the bill, a child offender on the registry who was convicted as a juvenile would have to jump through several hoops to get his or her name taken off. That includes being evaluated by a private and state psychologist who would testify in court on the person’s potential of re-offending. The current draft of the bill calls for preventing the person from re-petitioning the court for three years if the request is denied.
The petition can be made regardless of the offense. To allay fears of public safety, Rutherford stressed that older teens who commit a high-level sex offense, such as rape, usually are prosecuted as adults, making them ineligible to apply to be taken off the registry.
Rutherford, a criminal defense attorney, said he is committed to reintroducing the bill until it gets passed to stop “branding children for life as sex offenders.”
“By branding them that early, we have destroyed their lives,” he said. “We’ve got to figure out how to make it better.”
He isn’t alone in his thoughts. Jeff Moore, who represented the South Carolina Sheriff’s Association for more than 30 years before retiring in 2014, said to force a teen who committed a mistake to remain for the rest of his or her life on the registry essentially ends their lives.
“They can count their lives over because no college will accept them,” Moore said. “Applying for a job will be next to impossible. The point is these young people are children. They do things that as adults they wouldn’t do.”
Moore stressed he’s not promoting sexual promiscuity among teens. But the reality is that young people may find themselves with “raging hormones” and “experimenting with their sexuality.” He added that he doesn’t think Rutherford’s idea goes far enough; he’d rather see 21-year-olds automatically expunged from the registry if they have not re-offended.
In 11 jurisdictions, including Georgia and New York, teens adjudicated as committing a sex offense are not required to register as an offender, according to a 2013 report by the international advocacy group Human Rights Watch. Another 20 states have instituted special juvenile procedures or age limits that can end the teen’s duty to register after a certain point, according to the Center for Sex Offender Management.
Numbers on how many South Carolina juveniles are on the registry are difficult to track down because the registry doesn’t differentiate between teens and adults. And numbers on how many adults could benefit from the law are also difficult to attain because the registry does not state if they were convicted as juveniles.
In 2013, Human Rights Watch issued a report on the harm it causes to require juvenile sex offenders to be placed on a registry. The report, authored by Nicole Pittman, detailed how the label causes “long-term public humiliation” and can cause “profound damage to a child’s development and self-esteem.”
An offender, interviewed by phone for the report in 2012 as a 26-year-old and identified only as Christian W., said he went on the registry at 14 years old for inappropriately touching his younger cousin.
“I live in a general sense of hopelessness, and combat suicidal thoughts almost daily due to the life sentence (registration) and punishment of being a registrant,” Christian said. “The stigma and shame will never fully go away, people will always remember. The consequences will always be there even if one could eventually get off the registry.”
Rutherford’s bill faces at least one opponent, however. The state’s chief victims rights advocate, Laura Hudson, said she will fight the current draft of the bill because it does not comply with the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, commonly referred to as SORNA. The state would lose federal grants for failing to comply with SORNA.
Hudson said she’s OK with having a judge re-evaluate a juvenile sex offender placed on the registry as long as it’s been 10 years since they committed the offense.
“I am very annoyed and will do everything I can to kill it,” Hudson said. “This is about public safety.” ..Source.. by Cynthia Roldan
October 30, 2014
Mom of Spartanburg teen killed trick-or-treating asks for caution this Halloween
10-30-2014 South Carolina:
SPARTANBURG, SC (FOX Carolina) - Erica Fields, 17, was hit by a car while collecting candy with her younger brother on Halloween in 2013.
Her mother Kalani Fields said she never wants any parent to go through what she did the night her daughter died.
Fields said Erica and her brother were with a larger group near Fernwood Drive when a car came towards them. Fields said Erica pushed her brother out of the way of the car before being struck.
"Infectious happiness," is how Fields described her daughter. "She was always happy. She loved her friends and her family."
Spartanburg police investigated the crash and closed the case without pressing charges against the driver. Fields said her faith led her to forgive the man that hit her daughter. And as Halloween approaches once again, she is asking for all those that plan to be out to be extra cautious.
"Be vigilant, be safe, trick-or-treat in the daytime hours," Fields said. "Drivers be vigilant, drive slower than the speed limit, there are children out there. I don't want to turn on the news and see that another family has gone through this."
Spartanburg police is reminding parents and drivers to stay safe on Halloween as well. Read their safety tips here. ..Source.. by Adrian Acosta
October 14, 2014
Halloween advisory issued for sex offenders
10-14-2014 South Carolina:
NEWBERRY — The Newberry County Sheriff’s Office, along with the S.C. Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, has issued an advisory that they will enforce a Halloween curfew for Newberry County registered sex offenders and offenders under its supervision for a sex-related offense.
“We want parents to know that there is an extra measure of protection when their children go trick-or-treating,” Newberry County Sheriff Lee Foster said.
Instead of going door to door, Foster recommends that parents as well as children think about going to organized events such as Trunk-or-Treat or a Halloween carnival.
Foster said in cooperation with SCDPPPS they will keep track of those listed as sex offenders and for other offenses from 5:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. on Oct. 25 in Whitmire and on Halloween in the city of Newberry, Newberry County and Prosperity.
The curfews are statewide, the only exception being those offenders who are working or in transit to or from work. The curfew is used to ensure the public’s peace of mind and minimize unnecessary issues for offenders.
The curfews will be enforced using surveillance techniques throughout the county that will include sex offender residency verification and spot-checks.
Sex offenders will be notified that there must be no lights on inside or outside of their homes, no candy distribution, and no participation in Halloween parties or carnivals.
The release from the NCSO stated that registered offenders in some counties will have to report to a designated location for the duration of the curfew. Those affected will be notified by their probation or parole agents. ..Source.. by Elyssa Parnell
April 27, 2014
Community Meeting Discussing Halfway Housing Gets Heated
Outraged neighbors took on a Christian ministry they said is housing sex offenders and ex-cons in their neighborhood. The meeting held in Roebuck in Spartanburg County was so heated, extra deputies were called in to keep things from getting out of hand.
"Our community children are prisoners in their flipping homes... not your ex convicts. Put 'em back behind bars, we don't want them," shouted one woman.
The neighbors are angry about a mobile home park with 9 trailers, a dozen felons and at least 5 registered sex offenders.
The trailer homes are operated by a South Carolina prison ministry called “Jumpstart”.
The group helps former inmates find work and transitional housing after they’re released.
One board member said the inmates will be moving into local communities no matter what, so Jumpstart helps ease them back into civilian life with a pathway to jobs and housing so that the offenders are less likely to return to jail.
Thursday, more than 200 Roebuck and Pauline residents gathered to air their grievances to Jumpstart founder, Tim Terry, Senator Shane Martin, and other speakers on hand to offer solutions.
Nearly 3 hours later, many in attendance told 7 On Your Side reporter, Addie Hampton, they were more frustrated leaving the meeting than going into it, feeling the heated back and forth got them nowhere.
Kim Condry lives in the trailer park along with the Jumpstart ministries residents. She was in tears explaining the fears she shares with many in attendance.
"My six year old loved looking out his window. He loves the woods, but with us living between sex offenders. Between sex offenders! We live in the middle trailers and knowing there's potential for a murderer to be over the hill from us, he's not allowed to look at his window no more," she cried.
But for Terry, who boasts a 5% recidivism rate for Jumpstart graduates compared to the state rate at more than 50%, he said he was willing to find a working solution, but did not feel people were open to what he had to stay.
"I'm open for solutions. I'm just doing the best I can with what I've got. All I know is the proof is in the pudding...people's lives are being changed people are reconciling with their families, sex offenders," said Terry.
The biggest concern for residents in this meeting was that they were never informed about this transitional housing and the potential for sex offenders to be living there.
Currently there is no South Carolina law that states people have to be publicly notified. Instead they can look online and see if a registered sex offender lives close to their home.
State lawmakers say this is not enough. Senator Shane Martin said there needs to be a change starting in Columbia with how people are notified.
"I think what we overwhelmingly heard tonight was notification was the number one thing and when I'm not notified and representative talon is not notified and community members are not notified it's really hard to make informed decisions," said Martin.
7 On Your Side covered Jumpstart in 2012 when the group tried to set up a halfway house in Spartanburg’s Converse Heights neighborhood.
Those neighbors collected 350 signatures on a petition asking the zoning board to reject the new neighbor.
After the public outcry, a local church donated a property for the halfway house.
Roebuck neighbors will try a similar strategy.
There is an option for people truly concerned about registered sex offenders in their neighborhood to get instant updates. It's called “Offender Watch” and it's a program through sled. You register your address or any other important addresses and it will send you an instant updates if a registered sex offender moves in close to those addresses. ..Source.. by Addie Hampton
Deputies: Some Sex Offender Websites Not Updated
The Anderson County Sheriff's Office is letting people know, to be careful where you look for information online about sex offenders in the community.
The Sheriff's Office posted a warning on its facebook page that some sex offender search websites or apps, claiming to offer that information, aren't always accurate or up to date. They say some of the information on other sites is at least two years old.
Deputies say the best way is to go to an official site to search in your community.
In Anderson County, there are about 480 registered sex offenders. The Sheriff's Office updates the registry on a regular basis. Depending on the type of offense, they have to check in from every 90 days to every six months.
Deputies also encourage people to sign up for alerts that can tell you if a sex offender moves in nearby. You can even receive updates about a specific offender. ..Source.. by WSPA Staff
October 11, 2013
Stolen laptop leads to child pornography charges for Summerville man
NORTH CHARLESTON, SC (WCSC) - Investigators arrested a 27-year-old Summerville man after police say they located a stolen laptop that was filled with child pornography.
The North Charleston Police Department arrested Shawn Gibeaut on Wednesday and charged him with four counts of third-degree sexual exploitation of a minor.
Gibeaut's arrest stems from an incident on Dec. 24, 2012 when officers responded to an address on Ashley Phosphate Road in reference to a stolen laptop. The company the victim works for told authorities that the laptop was equipped with a program that would allow police to track the computer, and what was viewed, when it was activated.
Authorities say between April 3 and 4 of this year, the computer was activated. A police report states that the victim was then able to access the computer remotely, and discovered child pornography on the laptop.
Detectives were then able to track the IP address to Gibeaut's apartment in Summerville.
On July 16, Gibeaut told detectives that he was the owner of the computer but it was no longer at his home. A police report states Gibeaut told police that the computer was at a location in Rivers Avenue, where detectives eventually recovered the laptop. ..Source.. by Ray Rivera
September 7, 2013
California poised to implement first electronic license plates
Cops, license plate readers are obsolete. You can now track us closer.
This week, the California State Senate approved a bill that would create the nation’s first electronic license plate. Having already passed the state’s assembly, the bill now goes to Gov. Jerry Brown (D) for his signature.
The idea is that rather than have a static piece of printed metal adorned with stickers to display proper registration, the plate would be a screen that could wirelessly (likely over a mobile data network) receive updates from a central server to display that same information. In an example shown by a South Carolina vendor, messages such as “STOLEN,” “EXPIRED,” or something similar could also be displayed on a license plate.
The bill’s language says that for now, the program would be limited to a “pilot program” set to be completed no later than January 1, 2017.
“The pilot program shall be limited to no more than 0.5 percent of registered vehicles for the purpose of road testing and evaluation,” the bill states.
Other states, including South Carolina and New Jersey, also have similar bills in progress. A South Carolina company, Compliance Innovations, did not immediately respond to Ars’ request for comment. That company has been leading the charge in the Palmetto State to implement electronic license plates.
State isn’t getting location data directly, for now
Not surprisingly, though, privacy concerns abound. After all, if the state’s authorities can send and receive data to your digital license plate, then they have to know where you are. That would make the use of the increasingly ubiquitous license plate readers completely irrelevant—law enforcement likely would be able to either directly access location data in real-time and/or get historical travel data.
The state senator who introduced the bill, Sen. Ben Hueso, a Democrat who represents San Diego, did not respond to Ars’ multiple requests for an interview or comment. It still remains unclear as to exactly why this bill was proposed and what its objectives are. The precise technical details of the program are similarly unclear, as is how long plate information would be retained and who would have access to it.
“We've been talking to Sen. Hueso on the bill, and it's gotten some amendments that address some of the location privacy issues—within the pilot, the DMV would not be receiving any location information,” Lee Tien, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), told Ars. “But the company that operates the plates would [have access, and] they are going to be controlling what's on the plates.”
The privacy advocate likened the proposed system to a moving wiretap that reveals an individual’s vehicle location constantly.
California has already chosen a small, unknown startup
Various local media have reported that the state's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) would save $20 million in postage by not having to mail renewal stickers. The DMV did not immediately respond to Ars’ request to confirm this figure. Further, the bill—known officially as SB 806—did not originate with the DMV.
“The California Department of Motor Vehicles does not have a position on SB 806,” Artemio Armenta, a DMV spokesperson, told Ars in ...continued... by Cyrus Farivar
Switch to Electronic License Plates Could Improve SC Highway Safety
6-17-2013 South Carolina:
COLUMBIA, S.C. - South Carolina is considering a proposal, still in its early stages, to switch from metal license plates to new electronic license plates, or e-tags, as a way to improve highway safety.
"It's the first of its kind," says David Findlay, co-founder of Compliance Innovations, the South Carolina company that created the e-tags. "It's not an LCD or an LED. What it's made of is electronic paper. It's a new technology that allows you to hold the image with no power whatsoever for over 10 years. The only time it needs power is when you're changing the status or the image on the plate."
That power comes from the vibrations of your car, and from a transparent film over the tag that collects solar power.
The reason e-tags should improve highway safety is because the tags would be electronically linked to the DMV, so if a driver's license has been suspended or his insurance has lapsed, the DMV would send a signal to the license plate. The word "SUSPENDED" or "UNINSURED" would appear on the license plate.
If your car is stolen, the DMV could make the tag read "STOLEN". The state could also use the tags during Amber Alerts or other emergencies.
"We actually put that wording on the license plate across the top and, depending on how the state wants it, it could be in bright red, and we can actually flash the plate, have it flashing as it goes down the road," says Brian Bannister, co-founder of the company.
Even though the DMV would be able to send a signal to the electronic license plate to change its wording, the agency would not be able to track where you are. "No one entity could actually track an individual vehicle," Bannister says. "It would require three court orders: to the DMV; to us; and the (cellular) carrier themselves to actually be able to locate a vehicle."
At this point, the company is proposing that the state use e-tags as a pilot program with state-owned vehicles. There are still several things that need to be worked out, like reducing the size of the prototype e-tags so they're the same size as current license plates, and bringing down production costs. While a metal license plate costs anywhere from $3 to $7 to make, Findlay says his company is hoping to reduce the cost to make e-tags to under $100.
But the savings to the state could be significant. It's estimated the state loses $150 million a year because of drivers who drive with expired tags or without insurance.
Findlay and Bannister says if the state switches to e-tags and that reduces the number of uninsured drivers, insurance companies would lower their rates. ..Source.. by Robert Kittle
Posted:
1:27 PM
0
comments
Labels: .California, .New Jersey, .South Carolina, ( .News-Heads Up, 2013, License Plate Reader
July 30, 2013
Couple Arrested for Sex Offender Killing Spree Only Created More Victims
7-30-2013 South Carolina:
Nobody likes sex offenders. It's a simple truth. But a South Carolina husband and wife team charged with killing a sex offender and the criminal's wife aren't exactly heroes either.
Cops say Jeremy Moody and his wife, Christine, shot and stabbed Charles Parker and his wife, Gretchen, simply because Parker was on the state's sex offender registry. Scarier, still? Moody allegedly planned to go on a spree, killing every sex offender he could find.
I know, it's tempting to do the same. As I mentioned before, no one likes a sex offender, least of all me.
But if you can't see what's wrong with killing Charles Parker, a man who technically was free to go about his life and who wasn't actually doing anything wrong when he was murdered, at least you can see the problem with killing Gretchen Parker. She wasn't a sex offender. She hadn't hurt anyone.
All she did was end up in the wrong place at the wrong time. Cops say she was killed only because she was in the house.
Now just imagine the Moodys hadn't been caught, if they'd been able to continue with their alleged plans to travel the state taking out sex offenders, one by one. If they cared so little for Gretchen Parker's life, just imagine how many other innocent victims would have been left in their wake? People who don't carry the stain of having done something horrible to other people.
Vigilante justice sounds like it's heroic. It's been romanticized by countless books and movies.
But the sad truth is, there's nothing heroic about taking lives. At the end of the day, it's still a crime, and it still hurts countless people. ..Source.. by Jeanne Sager
Union slaying suspect on sex-offender victim: "He was a demon"
7-30-2013 South Carolina:
UNION, SC — Two suspects charged in the deaths of a registered sex offender and his wife had something to say to reporters Monday as they faced a judge on additional charges.
Jeremy Lee Moody, 30, and his wife, Christine Moody, 36, both of 213 S. 1st St., Lockhart, were charged Monday by the Union County Sheriff's Office with first-degree burglary and two counts each of kidnapping and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime, Sheriff David Taylor said.
The Moodys were charged last week with two counts each of murder in the deaths of Charles Marvin Parker, 59, and his wife, Gretchen Dawn Parker, 51, at their home at 2809 Furman Fendley Highway, Jonesville. Both Parkers were shot and stabbed, investigators said.
Authorities say Charles Parker was targeted because he was a registered sex offender, and that Jeremy Moody has admitted planning to kill another registered sex offender, had he not been arrested.
As Christine Moody was being led in to her bond hearing Monday before Judge Arthur T. Sprouse, she said of the victims: "These were pedophiles." When asked whether the killings were connected to the white supremacy group Crew 41, she replied: "I'm a supporting member of Crew 41. This had nothing to do with Crew 41."
Sprouse explained the additional charges to Christine Moody at the hearing. She admitted that the chance of receiving bond was pretty slim. "God is good all the time, but he's not that good, your honor, she said. "You're going to PR (personal recognizance) me, aren't you?" she added with a laugh. "Because we go way back."
Near the end of the brief hearing, Moody asked Sprouse whether she would go to court on Oct. 8 with her husband.
"I'd like to see my husband again," she said. "I love him very much."
As she walked out of the hearing, a reporter asked whether she felt Charles Parker deserved to be killed.
Christine Moody stopped, looked straight into a TV camera and said, "He was a demon."
Jeremy Moody was less talkative with Sprouse. But as he came out of the hearing, he gave reporters a thumbs up.
A reporter told Jeremy Moody that his wife had called Charles Parker a pedophile and a demon.
"He's all of those things," Jeremy Moody said. "He deserved what he got."
Jeremy and Christine Moody are being represented by public defender Eric Delaney. Delaney has met with the couple since their arrests last week, but did not appear with them in court Monday.
Taylor said the Moodys had cooperated with investigators in giving statements and other information about the killings, so the additional charges were delayed.
Taylor said he has learned that white supremacists sometimes target sex offenders, even if they're not of a different race. He wouldn't comment on whether the killings would be classified as a hate crime.
"We're still working with the FBI," Taylor said. "We're still working this case. I see no timeline on when it may be over."
The FBI defines a hate crime as a "traditional offense like murder, arson or vandalism with an added element of bias," according to the agency's website. In order to collect statistics, Congress defines such crimes as "a criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender's bias against a race, religion, disability, ethnic origin or sexual orientation."
In 2011, according to the most recent FBI figures, 1,944 law enforcement agencies reported 6,222 hate crime incidents to the agency, involving 7,254 offenses.
Jeremy Moody has a prominent "skinhead" tattoo across his throat, along with the words "white power" tattooed on the top of his bald head. He also has an eagle and swastika, "Made in America" and other tattooed symbols associated with skinheads.
On their Facebook pages, Christine and Jeremy Moody use the last name Mengele, the last name of German physician Josef Mengele, who was known for his inhumane medical experiments on twins and other prisoners at the Auschwitz concentration camp during World War II. Christine Moody's page contained posts last week in which she appeared to be trying to recruit new members for Crew 41 and used racial slurs, but those posts had been removed by Monday.
Taylor said investigators are still gathering intelligence on Crew 41, a white supremacy group that according to Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil-rights group, is less than a year old and claims to have chapters in Nebraska, Utah and South Carolina.
According to Southern Poverty Law Center statistics, there are 1,007 known hate groups in the U.S., including neo-Nazis, Klansmen, white nationalists, neo-Confederates, racist skinheads and black separatists. That number includes 21 documented groups in South Carolina. Of those 21, five are based in the Upstate, including an anti-gay group and a white nationalist group in Spartanburg County.
Despite the Moodys' apparent ties to white supremacy and Crew 41, Taylor said investigators think they were acting independently of the group. Last week was a learning process for the sheriff and local investigators, who have rarely dealt with hate and white supremacy groups, Taylor said.
"I learned a lot, more than I knew last week," the sheriff said.
The Moodys are scheduled for their initial appearances in general sessions court Oct. 8. ..Source.. by JENNY ARNOLD
July 29, 2013
Group calls for moratorium on sex offender registry after killings
The double murder of a registered sex offender and his wife has at least one group questioning whether it is truly in the public’s best interest to publish the addresses of sex offenders online.
Reform Sex Offender Laws, Inc. released a statement last week asking Gov. Nikki Haley to order that offenders’ addresses be removed from public view until the state legislature considers a more comprehensive solution.
“Vigilante murderers who target those on public sex offender registries need only turn on their computers and enter a zip code to get an instant list of potential victims along with their addresses,” the statement said. The group’s executive director Brenda Jones said she worries the publicity from this particular case may encourage other vigilantes to take the law into their own hands.
Union County Sheriff’s deputies say 30-year-old Jeremy Moody told them he killed 59-year-old Charles “Butch” Parker and his wife because Parker was listed on South Carolina’s registry. Parker’s name and address were posted due to a 1991 criminal sexual conduct conviction, according to the Union County Sheriff’s Department. His wife was not listed. Union County Sheriff David Taylor said Moody was also planning to kill another unidentified offender when deputies arrested him Tuesday.
But law enforcement officials say the benefits of the online database outweigh the potential risks. South Carolina Sheriffs’ Association executive director Jeff Moore said the registry helps make the public aware of offenders in their area, especially if a certain neighborhood has an exceptionally high number living there.
“I’m happy my daughter has the ability to go to a website and determine whether or not there are sex offenders in an apartment complex that she’s going to be moving into,” he told South Carolina Radio Network.
South Carolina’s laws are strict in this area. Once an offender is listed, they can never come off the registry no matter how much time has elapsed or how minor the offense. Moore said many other states do allow an offender to appeal their listing after a certain amount of time has passed.
Moore said this is the first recorded instance of a South Carolinian being targeted and murdered due to the registry since its creation in 1994. More than 12,000 names are currently listed, according to data from the State Law Enforcement Division. “This is horrendous and deplorable, but it’s only one (case),” Moore said. However, Moore adds there have other situations where an offender was harassed or threatened.
But Jones said at least 37 people nationwide have been killed by vigilantes targeting registered or accused sex offenders since 1991. That number includes Gretchen Parker, whom deputies say was murdered because of her marriage to Charles Parker.
She said “80 to 90 percent” of those listed on registries are not considered threats to the general public, and that high-risk offenders or child molesters actually make up a “very small number.”
“Most of us have done something we regret,” she told South Carolina Radio Network. “Those who have committed a crime have been tried, they’ve been convicted, they’ve served their time and they have been punished. A civilized society does not take and put those people on a hit list.”
Jones said South Carolina could consider changes such as only listing offenders publicly by their town or neighborhood, not their physical address. She said the state could also look at Maine, which created a tiered system in 2012 for 10-year, 25-year, and lifetime registrants based on the severity of their crime. ..Source.. by Matt Long
July 26, 2013
In wake of murders, calls for sex offender registry to go private
At its heart, law enforcement agencies across the country say that the sex offender registry is a great resource when used. For example, when people are moving into a neighborhood, or perhaps if they have questions about a neighbor.
"The sex offender registry is a tool, and it's a tool for both law enforcement and the general public," said Lt. Michael Hildebrand with the Greenville County Sheriff's Office. "And just like every tool, when it is used properly, it's a good thing."
But Union County deputies said that registry was used as a tool for evil.
Jeremy and Christine Moody told authorities that they targeted Charles and Gretchen Parker, because Charles was on the sex offender registry, and they were gunning for more sex offenders on the list.
Deputies said the Moodys targeted Parker, claiming he was a "child molester", but authorities said the charge that made him a sex offender in South Carolina involved an adult. According to the sex offender registry, Parker also had another case that went back to 1991, but FOX Carolina has not been able to confirm details on that case.
"I wasn't at all surprised that it happened, unfortunately," said Brenda Jones, director of the group Reform of Sex Offender Laws.
The goal of Jones' organization is to limit public sex offender registries to law enforcement, schools, and only limit informing he public of sex offenders to a 'need to know' basis.
Jones said the murders of Charles and Gretchen Parker should serve as a wake-up call on why sex offenders need protection, and argued that if registries exist, they shouldn't show exact addresses. ..continued.. by Derek Dellinger
February 10, 2013
Boyfriend gets lifetime sex offender status for cellphone video
2-10-2013 South Carolina:
COLUMBIA, S.C. -- Sidney Myers will spend the next 18 months in a federal prison for 15 minutes worth of sex videos he made with his teenage girlfriend.
The girlfriend, who knew Myers was videoing at the time, was 16– which made her a minor under a federal sex offender law meant to apply to serious sex crimes. Having the video on his cellphone meant Myers violated federal law by possessing child pornography.
Myers’ prison sentence, handed down Thursday, is the type of nightmare scenario that law enforcement has been warning parents and high school students about: Intimate videos and photos of young people on electronic devices can send someone to prison.
Myers, who was 20 at the time, had no criminal record and whose attorney said comes from a “very good family,” now will be listed on South Carolina’s sex offender registry. The registry mostly includes sex predators, stalkers, pedophiles, child pornographers and rapists. That will sharply limit his future career choices and even where he can live.
“This is the most perplexing case I’ve had in a long time,” U.S. District Judge Joseph Anderson told Myers, of Eastover, during the sentencing hearing at the federal courthouse in Columbia.
Anderson also gave Myers 18 months in prison for making a bomb threat to Eau Claire High School in north Columbia on Nov. 2, 2011. He made the threat so he and his girlfriend, an Eau Claire student, could spend the day together without her having to skip school. The two 18-month sentences will be served concurrently.
Myers used a blocking technology to disguise his cellphone number when he called Eau Claire to make the threat. But FBI investigators easily got records from Verizon that they used to identify his HTC smart phone. Once they tracked Myers down, he confessed. In examining his phone, the FBI discovered the videos and charged him with making a bomb threat and child pornography.
What made the case so different from the normal child pornography case, prosecution and defense lawyers said, was that Myers didn’t download the video to a computer or try to sell it or even share it with anyone. And the 16-year-old’s mother knew about Myers and often let him spend the night at her house. Moreover, when Myers had met the girl, she had told him she was 18.
Another complicating factor: At 16, the girl was legally able to have consensual sex under South Carolina law. But under federal law, it isn’t legal to videotape minors under 18 having sex.
“I just have a problem with a sentence that long with the facts of this case,” Anderson said, noting it would cost taxpayers $192,000 to keep Myers in prison for nine years.
Ironically, the maximum sentence for Myers’ bomb threat charge by itself would have only brought six months’ probation for someone with no criminal record. What allowed prosecutors to seek prison is that his two crimes were linked together – the bomb threat had been made on the cell phone with the videos.
Myers’ lawyer, federal assistant public defender Katherine Evatt, had argued for a prison sentence of a year and a day, something that would be a punishment but would also take into account the peculiar facts of this case. She also told the judge that Myers’ left leg had been amputated – as a result of an earlier ATV accident – and “a term in prison would be harder for him. He will need special care.”
In a brief court statement, Myers apologized to his family and told Anderson, “I’m sorry about everything. If I could take it back I would. This ain’t my lifestyle.”
Anderson told Myers his crimes were just stupid. After the hearing, Myers walked over and shook hands with Holliday and the FBI agent who handled the case. “Good luck to you,” Holliday told him. ..Source.. by McClatchy-Tribune
February 21, 2012
SC bill to bar sex offenders from foster parenting
2-21-2012 South Carolina:
COLUMBIA, S.C. Legislators are discussing a bill that would make it illegal for convicted sex offenders to serve as foster parents in South Carolina.
Current law prohibits children from being placed in foster care with people who have a history of child abuse or have been convicted of certain crimes like criminal domestic violence.
The House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday is taking up the bill that would add sex offenders to that list.
The proposal would also bar courts from awarding custody to parents who are convicted sex offenders. ..Source.. by MEG KINNARD
February 17, 2012
S.C. panel: No public cash for inmate sex changes
2-17-2012 South Carolina:
COLUMBIA -- A South Carolina legislative panel on Thursday advanced a bill to prohibit state money from being used for sex change surgeries for inmates – a move opponents said brings them one step closer to a lawsuit challenging the legislation.
Under current policy, the South Carolina Department of Corrections is obligated to pay for hormonal treatment and surgery for inmates who come into the prison system during the sex-change process. According to agency spokesman Clark Newsom, no inmates have actually undergone the surgery in prison, and only one has asked for it, later changing his mind after counseling.
After a brief debate, a Senate subcommittee on Thursday approved a bill that would overturn that policy by removing public money from the equation. Senators did amend the legislation to allow inmates currently on hormonal therapy to continue treatment while in prison.
“If you come in on hormonal treatment, you stay on it,” said Sen. Paul Campbell, R-Goose Creek. “You don’t start on it once you’re in.”
Legislators discussing the bill, including sponsor Kevin Bryant, said their concern was potential costs for treatment and surgery. For one inmate, Campbell said, hormone treatment costs between $300 and $1,000 per year.
Currently, only one of South Carolina’s more than 22,000 inmates is on hormonal treatment, Bryant said. ..Source.. by Meg Kinnard
September 20, 2011
Hanging of 'Truck Nuts' Grows into a Free Speech Debate
Don't touch my junk,' is taking on new meaning.
"Truck nuts," fake bull testicles made of plastic or metal that drivers hang on the back of their pickups to make a truck look more manly, have been around for years. Some find them funny, while others find them offensive, prompting at least three states to try to ban them -- unsuccessfully.
But a recent case in South Carolina is fueling debate over whether these ornaments violate a state's indecency laws and if attempting to regulate them infringes on freedom of speech.
On July 5, Virginia Tice, 65, from Bonneau, S.C. pulled her pickup truck into a local gas station with red, fake testicles dangling from the trailer hitch. The town's police chief, Franco Fuda, pulled up and asked her to remove the plastic testicles.
When she refused, he wrote her a $445 ticket saying that she violated South Carolina’s obscene bumper sticker law.
The South Carolina code of laws reads, “a sticker, decal, emblem, or device is indecent … in a patently offensive way, as determined by contemporary community standards, sexual acts, excretory functions, or parts of the human body.”
Tice lawyered up and said that she was preparing to challenge Fuda in court. But before she could ask for a jury trial, Fuda, in a rare move, beat her to it.
Fuda says he is pushing for a jury trial and hopes the outcome will clarify the state’s obscenity laws, leaving no room for misinterpretation.
“The law is very clear, and I am prepared to take it all the way,” Fuda told FoxNews.com.
Scott Bischoff, Tice’s lawyer, says his client is not bowing down because “this whole thing was caused by the arresting officer, who is arbitrarily interpreting a statute incorrectly.”
Bischoff will argue whether these large, red, plastic testicles are “really an accurate depiction of a human body part.”
“He is nuts,” says Jay Bender, a lawyer and professor at the University of South Carolina, referring to Fuda and his interpretation of the law. Bender says although tasteless and stupid, they are not illegal, and adds, “Chief Fuda is abusing his arrest powers.” He says the statute is very clear about what material is obscene and “it doesn’t have anything to do with artificial bull testicles.”
David Hudson, a First Amendment attorney and scholar, says laws banning these types of decals, emblems or bumper stickers are problematic, but often someone just hasn’t challenged them.
Hudson believes Tice and her lawyer can make a good case the South Carolina law is “unconstitutionally vague and unconstitutionally board, and it violates the First Amendment.”
In the past, lawmakers in Tennessee, Virginia, Maryland and Florida have proposed legislation to ban these types of decals and other explicit bumper stickers.
Hudson detailed many cases where law enforcement officials cited individuals for the content of their bumper stickers, and in the majority of those cases, a judge tossed them out because “the First Amendment protects a great deal of offensive expression.”
Hudson also cites the Supreme Court’s opinion that “the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.”
Even though the attempts to ban "truck nuts" have been unsuccessful, customers are still leery about their legality.
Trick Trucks, a truck accessory chain, has been selling them for years and has had customers question whether they are illegal. Keith Dillard says sales at his Lanham, Md., store are hit and miss, but “when people talk about outlawing or banning them, they come in to buy them up.”
“I can’t see a piece of plastic being offensive, it’s not like you can’t see that along the road, there are farms all over,” says Ron Pelletier, assistant manager of the Trick Trucks in Waldof, Md. Both say most people buy them as gag gifts.
Neither side in Bonneau, S.C., is laughing over this legal mess, but they do agree the public interest in the case is shocking. Fuda said that he’s been getting a lot of feedback from people, including one Florida woman who stopped by the police station to say she was glad he wrote the ticket, while another man called to ask, “if we didn’t have anything better to do?”
“We concur with the sentiments of people in our community and across the nation that this whole thing is a big waste of time, but it was all started by Chief Fuda,” says Bischoff.
The case goes to trial next month. ..Source.. by Elizabeth Robichaux Brown
April 28, 2011
SC looks to prevent other states from sending sex offenders here for treatment
4-28-2011 South Carolina:
SC - Rep. Limehouse, Murphy and Horne are working on a new bill they hope to introduce as potential legislation shortly. Among other things, it would prevent other states from sending sex offenders to South Carolina for treatment.
The bill is being considered after 4 teenagers escaped from the Palmetto Summerville Behavioral Health facility. Three of those teenagers have been found. Law Enforcement is still searching for the fourth. He is believed to be a 19 year old.
News 2 talked to several neighbors who live in Oakbrook Commons, a neighborhood just down the road from Palmetto Health facility. Some neighbors said they didn't have any idea that teenagers with violent pasts were treated at the location. They said they want to have better notification, and they support legislation that would prevent sex offenders from other states from being treated in South Carolina.
We spoke with Rep. Chris Murphy. He said he is in Columbia along with Rep. Limehouse and Rep. Horne working on the potential legislation. Rep. Murphy says they met with officials from Palmetto Behavioral Health this morning to discuss concerns and what can be done to make their facilities more secure.
Murphy says a 1st draft of the legislation has been written, and they are editing it before preparing an actual bill to be submitted to the Legislature. Rep. Murphy expects to have a bill submitted either later this afternoon or in the morning.
Murphy says they are also looking at how DHEC may be able to have a role in helping solve the problem. ..Source.. by Raymond Owens
February 11, 2011
No Facebook for inmates under S.C. bill
I can maybe understand preventing inmates using computers within a prison system from setting up such accounts, but I think this bill goes WAY OVER THE LINE! Stop someone in the general public from expressing beliefs, if those beliefs are those of someone within a prison? Religious, Political just where do they intend the limit is? Nothing like trying to isolate folks so they cannot reintegrate into society; the state way!2-11-2011 South Carolina:
Inmates could not join Facebook or other social-networking sites, nor could their friends create memberships for them, if a new measure in the South Carolina Legislature becomes law.
South Carolina Democratic Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard and others introduced House Bill 3527 on Feb. 2. Under the measure:
“It is unlawful for an inmate to be a member of any Internet-based social networking website such as Facebook, Myspace, and Classmates. An inmate who joins an Internet-based social networking website or a person who establishes an account with an Internet-based social network website for an inmate is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five hundred dollars, or imprisoned not more than thirty days.”
The (Charleston) Post and Courier had reported on South Carolina inmates with Facebook accounts. One such story told of an inmate convicted of manslaughter who was able to post material from a cell phone in prison.
“This is an embarrassment to South Carolina that no lawmaker should tolerate," Gilliard told Post and Courier reporter Glenn Smith in a later story. “These inmates can use this to put people's lives in danger. We need to put a stop to this immediately."
A First Amendment advocate in Cleveland expressed concerns about the Gilliard bill.
“This bill strikes me as gratuitously cruel, essentially an effort to stifle basic acts of communication by inmates,” said Kevin F. O’Neill, a law professor at Cleveland-Marshall College of Law who has written about free-expression rights of inmates.
“But I think that a court would uphold it if the government can point to some inside-the-prison security concern that this bill is designed to advance. The courts have been receptive to regulations that are designed to prevent inmates from communicating — and thus cooperating — in concerted efforts to revolt or escape.”
The measure was referred to the House Judiciary Committee. Gilliard could not be reached for comment about the bill's chances of passing. ..Source.. David L. Hudson Jr., First Amendment scholar





