Showing posts with label .Nebraska. Show all posts
Showing posts with label .Nebraska. Show all posts

August 13, 2017

Nebraska lawmaker's bill aims to hold drone operators accountable for their crimes

8-13-17 Nebraska:

LINCOLN — A drone zips through the sky, peering for a moment into a home’s front window. It’s a scenario that causes concern for State Sen. Carol Blood. The Bellevue lawmaker is eyeing legislation that would hold drone owners accountable if they commit crimes.

Most states have adopted some kind of drone-related legislation, but past efforts in Nebraska have not been successful. A group of stakeholders will convene at the State Capitol this week to discuss Blood’s proposal, which she said is more comprehensive than any other state’s law.

Blood said she aims to make a reasonable policy that protects the public by keeping state law up to date with technology. “My goal is not to make unnecessary restrictions and regulations that take away from being a drone owner,” she said. “My goal for this bill is public safety.”

The early proposal addresses a number of areas. Among them:
» Using a drone, also known as an unmanned aircraft, to enter or hide in a building without permission would be considered first-degree trespassing.

Operating a drone less than 300 feet above private property without permission would be considered second-degree trespassing.

» Using a drone to spy or peep on someone who has a “reasonable expectation of privacy” would be illegal.

» Sex offenders would be barred from using drones to commit “unmanned aircraft harassment.”
..Continued..

Read More of Article...

November 5, 2016

Rethinking Nebraska's sex offender registry

11-5-16 Nebraska:

OMAHA, Neb. (WOWT) -- Do all the people on Nebraska’s Sex Offender Registry really need to be there? Do you think we should know the whereabouts of every sex offender in the state? Some people don’t think so.

Groundbreaking research at UNO found that most sex offenders do not reoffend. Research showed that putting every sex offender on a public website can lead to harassment and may contribute to conditions that make reoffending more likely.

Jeromy Wilson is a convicted sex offender; his picture was placed on the Nebraska Sex Offender Registry for exposing himself when he was 17. “It wasn’t something to harm nobody, it was me being young and dumb,” Wilson told WOWT 6 News.

Five years ago Wilson says he was an adult dating website. The then 25-year-old thought he was hooking up with a 19-year-old female, but later found out she was a minor.

“The last thing you really do when you go out on dates, you know, you talk to somebody ‘hey can you send me a copy of your id.’ You know that was where my mistake was,” Wilson said.

For that mistake Wilson was charged with first degree sexual assault of a child. He plead no contest to third degree sexual assault and went to prison for a year.

"I wasn’t denying the fact that I made a mistake, but I was also trying to savor the fact that she had falsified her information to me,” Wilson explained, “And I’m still trying to maintain some of my dignity.”

Now Wilson has a lifetime spot in the Nebraska Sex Offender Registry. He says people are using the registry to harass him, to call his clients to prevent him from working.

Wilson says it not fair that he continue to pay for the mistakes he made.

Because I’m trying to make my life better and prove not only to everyone else but to myself and my family that I’m better than this,” he said. “But you keep getting kicked while you’re down.”

For 15 years, UNO’S Dr. Lisa Sample has been researching why most sex offenders do reoffend and why Nebraska puts every sex offender on a registry.

“Not all sex offenders are created equal -- not all need to be on that registry,” said Dr. Sample. “Just because you’re on the registry did not make you a predatory pedophile. There are the Romeo and Juliet out there where somebody was 19 somebody was 16 - not old enough to consent, indecent exposure cases, flashing cases.”

But when most of us think about sex offenders we think of the worst: Roy Ellis did reoffend, kidnapping, assaulting and then killing 12 year old Amber Harris. Amber’s mom says the registry is necessary.

“I’m sorry for anybody who thinks they’ve been victimized or harassed, but it’s there for a reason because there’s people who go out there and reoffend,” said Harris.

Dr. Sample agrees it is necessary, but she says not all sex offenders should be on the list. She would like to see the registry return to a risk based system.

“Where we administered a risk assessment instrument to people upon conviction and we categorize them as low, medium or high risk and we alerted the public to only those people who presented a high risk of reoffending,” said Dr. Sample.

Wilson would also like to see that happen. Now 30 years old, his fiancĂ© expecting a child and he says he’s changed his life but he wonders how long he will have to drag his past around.

“I should be able to live my life without having to deal with public ridicule,” Wilson said. “Not to mention, later on down the road when my child grows up, I’m going to have to explain ‘hey why is daddy on the registry.’”

Information on the sex offender registry should not be used to retaliate against the people of the list, their families or their employees; vandalism, verbal or written threats of harm are illegal. ..Source.. by John Chapman

Read More of Article...

September 6, 2016

Lincoln man set for trial in Seward for hate crime sex assault

A HATE crime? Nebraska Hate Crime statute:

Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 28-110 (2010)
—A person in the State of Nebraska has the right to live free from violence, or intimidation by threat of violence, committed against his or her person or the destruction or vandalism of, or intimidation by threat of destruction or vandalism of, his or her property regardless of his or her race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, or disability.

Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 28-111(2010)
Imposes additional penalties on any person who commits one or more of the following criminal offenses against a person or a person's property because of the person's race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, or disability or because of the person's association with a person of a certain race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, age, or disability, unless such criminal offense is already punishable as a Class IB felony or higher classification.
9-6-16 Nebraska:

A 30-year-old Lincoln man pleaded not guilty to breaking into a woman's home and sexually assaulting her.

Chad E. Drewes faces 10 felony charges, one of them filed as a hate crime, in connection with a home-invasion robbery June 24 at the woman's rural Seward County home, according to the criminal complaint.

Seward County District Judge James Stecker set his trial in January.

A 77-year-old Seward woman told deputies a shirtless man kicked in a side door to her garage and began strangling her, then bound her feet and hands and dragged her into a bedroom and raped her.

Afterward, she said, he untied her and told her to stay in the bathroom, as he ransacked her house.

Scared, the woman stayed in the bathroom for another hour after he left, then rested out of exhaustion before walking to a neighbor's house to report the attack around 6:30 a.m.

Sheriff's deputies working with police found Drewes near the woman's stolen SUV at Ninth and Court streets in Lincoln and arrested him on suspicion of the crime.

Prosecutors charged him with first-degree sexual assault, enhanced as a hate crime because of the victim's age, first-degree assault, robbery, theft by unlawful taking over $5,000, burglary, first-degree false imprisonment and several other felonies. ..Source.. by Lincoln Journal Star

Read More of Article...

January 24, 2016

Son of judge, councilman acquitted of sex assault

1-24-16 Nebraska:

LINCOLN — The 32-year-old son of a Lincoln councilman and a federal judge has been acquitted of a sexual assault charge.

Online court records say Jonathan Camp was found not guilty Thursday by a Lancaster County District Court jury. The charge was felony sexual assault of an incompetent person.

Authorities say the woman reported that she was drugged at a home on Sept. 8, 2014. She reported that she fell asleep and awoke later to find Camp sexually assaulting her.

His parents are Councilman Jon Camp and U.S. District Judge Laurie Smith Camp. ..Source.. by Omaha.com

Read More of Article...

February 9, 2015

Former AG Bruning’s office advised corrections to ignore Supreme Court ruling

2-9-2015 Nebraska:

Contrary to what former Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning said in September, his office did advise the state corrections department to effectively disregard Nebraska Supreme Court rulings on supervising sex offenders, according to internal documents obtained by Nebraska Watchdog.

Bruning publicly denied that in a September press conference, after two former corrections attorneys said otherwise during their testimony before a legislative committee investigating several corrections scandals.

The department’s failure to heed a 2013 Supreme Court ruling on calculating sentences got it embroiled in scandal last summer when it was discovered sentences were miscalculated for hundreds of prisoners over nearly two decades. Consequently, 750 prisoners’ sentences were lengthened and other ex-cons were rounded up and put back in prison.

The screwed-up sentences were the subject of a special legislative inquiry last fall, with a bevy of corrections officials subpoenaed to testify under oath. During one of those hearings, former corrections attorney Sharon Lindgren said the attorney general’s office previously told two corrections attorneys — her boss, George Green, and attorney Kathy Blum — they didn’t need to heed the Supreme Court’s ruling in a 2009 case called State vs. Payan.

Green backed up her allegation during his testimony, but both of their reputations had been tarnished by the sentencing scandal — they both resigned rather than be fired — and few people paid much attention to what normally would have been a bombshell allegation against the state’s top law enforcement officer.

At the time, Bruning blasted the attorneys and said it was “utterly laughable” for them to start pointing fingers.

“The gang who couldn’t shoot straight can throw any stones they want,” he said in September. “We would never give advice to ignore the Supreme Court. That’s patently ridiculous and offensive.”

He said their testimony was “embarrassing to watch” and when he heard their allegations about his office, he responded with “hardy laughter.”

“They had an in-house group that was utterly incompetent,” Bruning said at the time. “They made the mess. We’re just trying to clean it up. … I certainly hope nobody lied under oath.”

But internal documents obtained by Nebraska Watchdog under the state open records act buttress Green’s and Lindgren’s allegations. ..Continued.. by Deena Winter | Nebraska Watchdog

Read More of Article...

February 5, 2015

Hearing on Proposed Changes to Sex-offender Law is Set for Thursday, February 12

2-5-2015 Nebraska:

The Nebraska Legislature's Judiciary Committee will hear testimony on LB 290, a bill that would bring Nebraska sex-offender law into minimal conformance with a years-old federal court ruling against the state, on Thursday, February 12.

Click here to read the introduced copy of the bill. Click here to read the court ruling the prompts the bill -- very instructive in terms of U.S. District Court Judge Richard Kopf's low opinion of a Nebraska law and the process that brought it about.

The hearing is scheduled for 1:30 p.m. in Room 1113 of the Nebraska State Capitol Building in Lincoln. Get there early if you want a good seat. If you want to testify, you can sign up to do so using forms that will be available in the hearing room. ..Continued.. by Eddie Sidgeweck @ Nebraskans Unafraid

Read More of Article...

January 17, 2015

Sex offender outpatient program a small cost in big system

1-17-2015 Nebraska:

For 23 years Caesar lived in an institution -- either prison or treatment center -- after being convicted of raping a woman in her apartment.

His options were limited. Someone else cooked his meals, told him when to get up, when to eat, when he could have visitors. He served his time.

And for the past year, he’s lived in Lincoln -- first in a halfway house, now in his own apartment. It's been a transition.

He’s had to learn how to cook dinner, how to shop for food, how to buy his own clothes and wash them. He’s had to learn to manage in a society that moved from typewriters to computers while he was behind bars. It hasn’t been easy for Caesar, whose real name isn't being used here.

He’s been fired from two jobs after others discovered he was on the sex offender list. He was hit by a car while riding his bike. He doesn’t always have money to purchase minutes for his cellphone -- the phone on which he's still trying to figure out how to set up voicemail.

But Caesar isn't whining. This is his reality as an ex-con with the sex offender label.

And he wants people to understand that one of the things keeping him sane, giving him hope, helping him manage his frustration and his behavior is a therapy program offered by Lincoln psychologist Mary Paine.

Caesar, 53, remembers the long walk home after he lost that first job, a good job. It was a cold night. He was angry, so angry. Losing his job was so unfair.

He walked past bars, but he didn’t go in because drinking is one of the things that got him in trouble.

He kept on walking. And he kept reminding himself of Paine’s advice: “There is nothing so bad we can’t fix, as long as you don’t re-offend.”

For about 50 men, the Sexual Trauma/Offense Prevention Program, or STOP, is a protective shield that tries to help keep them from re-offending or from acting out in the first place, and thus keeps them out of prison and keeps the public safe.

But the outpatient program that offers group and individual therapy based on individual needs faces problems this summer unless state government steps in with additional funding.

Paine’s program is one of the least expensive parts of the system the state has set up for sex offenders.

Right now, 1,120 sex offenders are in Nebraska prisons or state institutions and another 450 are supervised under parole and probation programs at a cost of more than $58.5 million.

Treatment at regional centers

As laws have changed and legislators have focused on sex offenders, more people are being kept in prison for longer or in the state's regional centers' sex offender treatment programs.

Today, more than 18 percent of Nebraska inmates have a sex offense as their most serious crime. It's the biggest category of offenses, with drugs coming in second at 12.9 percent.

In addition, the state run regional centers, which historically cared for people with serious mental illness, have been converted to sex offender treatment programs. In fact more than half the adults at Lincoln and Norfolk regional centers are sex offenders deemed too dangerous to return to the community without treatment.

Each year, mental health boards commit a dozen or more people about to get out of prison to the Norfolk Regional Center because they have served their sentences, but are considered dangerous sex offenders.

About 85 men are in the Norfolk center's program, at a cost of about $15.8 million last fiscal year. Norfolk’s entire mission is sex offender treatment and the men generally stay there for several years.

When they have finished the Norfolk program, people move to the next step, a sex offender program at the Lincoln Regional Center, which can house 85 people and in November had 78 patients, including three women. The cost was about $9.9 million last fiscal year.

When people in the Lincoln center's treatment program are ready to move out on their own, the local mental health board sometimes requires outpatient treatment.

Many of these people stay in Lincoln and use Paine’s program.

A public safety net

Programs like Paine’s provide transition for the client and a safety net for the public, said Shannon Black, a psychologist with the Lincoln Regional Center program.

Paine’s program helps clients adjust to life outside an institution.

For example, if someone loses a job and is trying to make ends meet, the added stress of not having a job could result in a crime being committed again. "We want to make sure they have the support, have someone who can talk with them," Black said.

Programs like STOP are also a safety net for the public.

Paine understands the risk factors, recognizes when someone is starting to demonstrate high-risk behavior, and she's willing to go back to the mental health board and have someone committed as an inpatient, Black said.

Where the money comes from

Paine's STOP program also includes people on probation and parole who have been convicted of sex offenses and are being supervised in the community.

People convicted of less serious sex offenses, including failure to comply with sex offender registration, are often given probation rather than prison sentences.

People convicted of sex offenses and nearing the end of their sentences are sometimes released to the parole program and finish their sentences living in the community.

State tax dollars pick up the costs of sex offenders in prison and in the regional centers. But there’s not always dedicated funding for sex offenders when they move into local communities.

The state picks up therapy costs for 25 people each year who come from the Lincoln Regional Center to the STOP program.

For the first time this year, the probation system also has money to pay for outpatient treatment like Paine’s program for people on probation.

But there is no money for people with low or no income who are on parole, no longer being supervised by the justice system, who have moved from other states or who want to make sure they don’t commit a crime in the first place.

Historically, Lancaster County picked up those unfunded STOP program therapy costs, but that ended when the county privatized mental health services for very low-income residents and turned them over to Lutheran Family Services in 2013.

Not all sex offenders are mentally ill

Sex offender is a legal status, not a mental health diagnosis, so funding can get complicated.

Not every person with a sex offense conviction is mentally ill.

“You can be totally sane, without a diagnosable mental health disorder, and be a sex offender,” said Scot Adams, director of behavioral health at the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services.

There is state and federal funding for people with mental illness but no funding mechanism for sex offenders, he said.

Finding money for outpatient programs like Paine’s can be difficult.

“No one wants to pay for this,” said Dean Settle, retired director of the Lancaster County Mental Health Center. "Even if people do have a mental health diagnosis, many elected leaders don’t want to spend a dime on sex offender therapy."

And he guesses that about half of the people with sex offense convictions who could benefit from therapy do not have mental health diagnoses.

Outpatient programs like Paine’s are cheap compared to inpatient options: $6,000 per client annually for STOP, $33,525 average per inmate cost in prison, $194,545 per patient for the Norfolk Regional Center.

Paine’s program and others like it are a public safety matter, said Settle. Local public officials need to be aware of that and fund it at the local level or make sure the state is addressing it, he said.

Research shows therapy can help

Therapy can work for people convicted of sex offenses, according to professionals in the field.

“Absolutely, you can treat sex offenders,” said Adams.

People have the impression of once a sex offender, always a sex offender, said Black.

"Research just doesn’t hold that to be true,” she said.

In many circumstances, Paine said, the recidivism rate is low.

“We treat people to make them better functioning individuals as a whole and to stop the sexual offending behavior," she said.

Research into what works should provide guidelines for treatment and sentencing, she said.

Long sentences are not always necessary and they make the readjustment after release more complicated, Paine said.

The longer people are institutionalized the more complicated their return to society becomes, she said.

"I don’t have a problem with putting individuals away, but that is something we need to do much more thoughtfully so it achieves the goals we are seeking."

Chance at life

Caesar was a victim as well as a victimizer. He’s learning through counseling with Paine how to heal those childhood wounds and said his childhood is no excuse for the crime he committed, the harm he caused.

It is an explanation, he said, “but it doesn’t absolve me of doing what is right.”

Paine’s program also helps Caesar deal with the stresses many ex-cons have readjusting. And her program helps him avoid the behavior that led to that rape decades ago, behavior he does not intend to repeat.

Caesar sorts through a small stack of papers from his therapy, and spreads a large sheet of newsprint, several feet square, on the floor of his apartment.

On it, he’s printed the phases of the assault cycle -- trigger event, negative thinking -- phases he would likely go through before committing a violent act.

“If you don’t know what is happening, then you can’t stop it," he said.

But the knowledge gives him a chance to intervene.

He gets lonely, but he doesn’t try to hit on women.

He has money in his pocket, but he doesn’t go to bars.

He gets bored, but rather than wallow in it he cooks up black-eyed peas and cabbage like his mama used to make.

He gets angry because there seems to be no way to keep a job, find friends, fit in, because he is branded with the sex offender label.

But he puts on his music, cleans his house, behaves like a responsible adult.

It’s part of what he has learned with Paine.

"Dr. Paine gave me a real chance at life," he said. ..Source.. by Nancy Hicks | Lincoln Journal Star

Read More of Article...

November 17, 2014

Audit On Prison Issue Released, Recommendations Made

11-17-2014 Nebraska:

An audit of the Department of Correctional Services, released Monday by the Legislative Performance Audit Committee, found issues of concern with the reliability of DCS data regarding inmates, as well as the department's use of segregation. Additionally, the audit report recommended that the Legislature consider amending relevant commitment and corrections acts to ensure the evaluation procedures and definitions for potentially mentally ill and dangerous inmates and dangerous sex offenders are "clear and consistent."

Performance Audit Committee members, prompted largely by the 2013 DCS release of Nikko Jenkins, authorized an audit of the corrections department in January. Legislative concerns about DCS' handling of Jenkins ultimately resulted in the initiation of two other investigations, with both of which the Audit Office coordinated its research.

The audit scope included an examination of the department's disciplinary process and use of segregation; the adequacy of inmate programming- such as substance abuse treatment and mental health services- and the relationship between parole decisions and the availability of programming. The scope also called for a comparison of the commitment process under the Mental Health Commitment Act and the Sex Offender Commitment Act and of the processes the department uses to identify inmates who may be subject to civil commitments under the acts.

Sen. John Harms, chairman of the Performance Audit Committee said, "our Committee recommended that the Department of Correctional Services engage an independent outside entity to conduct an audit of its data system, in order to ensure that accurate and reliable electronic data- particularly in the areas of programming, mental health diagnoses, and length of time individual inmates spend in different types of segregation-is available for both internal and external use." The Committee suggested in the report that such an audit include technology issues and the process and management of data collection and quality control.

Regarding segregation, the report found that while the amount of time in segregation inmates received for individual sanctions fell within established limits, the actual, aggregate time some inmates served in consecutive periods of disciplinary segregation or consecutive periods of disciplinary segregation and administrative confinement was much more time than the limitations on single sanctions suggested.

Sen. Harms said, citing this finding as well as testimony received by the LR 424 committee, "we believe the department should evaluate its use of segregation to ensure it reflects current national standards and best practices in the field."

The report also found that while state law clearly identifies inmates who must be evaluated by the department prior to release to determine if they are dangerous sex offenders subject to civil commitment proceedings, state law provides no such guidance for the identification of inmates who may be mentally ill and dangerous and thus subject to commitment under the Mental Health Commitment Act. Thus, the identification by DCS staff of prisoners who should be evaluated as potentially mentally ill and dangerous requires a greater amount of professional judgment than that required for the determination of potentially dangerous sex offenders. The report also identified a major policy question regarding whether, under Nebraska law, a personality disorder is considered a mental illness.

Based on those findings and others, Sen. Harms said, "the Committee suggested that the Legislature consider whether existing differences in the two methods of commitment, as well as differences in definitions and notification processes, were intended or not. For any differences that are unintentional, we should consider bringing the acts into conformity with one another in order to achieve greater structure and consistency." ..Source.. Courtesy: Nebraska Legislature

Read More of Article...

October 27, 2014

Sex offender program gets funding for rest of fiscal year

10-26-2014 Nebraska:

The state will step in to keep the Lincoln-based outpatient treatment program for sex offenders running until next summer.

The STOP program, run by Lincoln psychologist Dr. Mary Paine, has been successful in reducing recidivism of people with sexually deviant behavior who are living in the Lincoln area.

The program, once under the umbrella of the Lancaster County Mental Health Center, lost funding for about half its clients this spring when the county privatized mental health services. The contract with Lutheran Family Services did not include the sex offender program.

The county funded the program during the summer for 26 clients, at a cost of no more than $37,500.

The state Department of Health and Human Services has agreed to continue funding for the outpatient treatment program costs, said Kerry Eagan, chief administrative officer for the Lancaster County Board.

That temporary state funding, which totals $166,000 for 10 months, lasts through June 30, the end of the fiscal year.

By then, local leaders hope a permanent funding solution will be found.

HHS decided to use one-time funding to maintain the program while state senators decide what is the best policy for the state, said Scot Adams, director of the DHHS Behavioral Health Division.

"We didn't want to lose this resource" during that year, he said.

DHHS already pays for about half of the 50-plus people who participate in the program because they have been released from the Lincoln Regional Center sex offender program.

There are others who come to the program in different ways and the state has some obligation to support them, Adams said.

The new governor's administration and state senators will make the decisions next year about what to do about this group, according to Adams.

Some of the clients come from the prison system and are required to participate in outpatient programs as a condition of release.

“We hope they (state leaders) see the wisdom in providing treatment for sex offenders who get out of jails and prisons," said Gwen Thorpe, deputy chief administrative officer for the County Board.

“We know she (Mary Paine) has a premier program,” Thorpe said.

The program is a mix of group and individual therapy, based on individual clients' needs. The program helps people adapt after being in prison or at the Lincoln Regional Center, and helps them avoid deviant behavior.

The county picked up the costs for the summer after probation and parole offices raised concerns about what would happen if the program closed, Thorpe said. Some people would be returned to prison or the Regional Center, both more expensive options.

Others would not have the support that reduces deviant behavior. ..Source.. by NANCY HICKS

Read More of Article...

June 27, 2014

Sex offender program gets temporary reprieve

6-27-2014 Nebraska:

Lancaster County commissioners demonstrated their commitment Thursday to preserving a program that helps keep sex offenders from re-offending. The County Board voted to spend as much as $40,000 to support the program for another three months.

Funds for the STOP program have come from the county, Region V Systems and the state in recent years. When Lutheran Family Services took over the Community Mental Health Center’s core services this year, the STOP program wasn’t included in its contract with the county.

Region V Systems, which pays for behavioral health services in 16 Southeast Nebraska counties with state, local and federal funds, says it has no money for the program.

And Lancaster County commissioners say they shouldn’t be paying for the program because they already pay $928,000 a year to Region V Systems for local services, far more per county resident than other counties in the region.

So local officials are scrambling to find money to continue the program.

“This will give us an opportunity to get future funding nailed down,” said Gwen Thorpe, the county’s deputy chief administrative officer.

On Thursday, the County Board discussed taking the $40,000 for the program from funds it had planned to spend on administrative costs for Region V Systems. Several commissioners suggested redirecting even more of the funds to the STOP program.

Dennis Meyer, county budget and fiscal officer, said the county spends $400,000 more each year on administrative costs for Region V than what it should be required to spend based on its population compared to other counties in the region.

“I say we go as deep in that fund as we need to go,” said County Board Chairman Larry Hudkins.

The $40,000 approved by the board Thursday will cover the cost of operating the STOP program from July through September.

Commissioner Brent Smoyer said it’s the county’s responsibility to ensure the program continues to serve sex offenders who might otherwise re-offend.

“It will be funded,” he said. “It will be dealt with.” ..Source.. by KEVIN ABOUREZK

Read More of Article...

June 23, 2014

Editorial, 6/23: Fund sex offender treatment

6-23-2014 Nebraska:

Local and state officials are in a stare down over funding that could put the public at risk.

At issue is an outpatient treatment program aimed at keeping sex offenders from re-offending.

There appears no dispute over the efficacy of the program. Testimonials come from a variety of sources.

The Sexual Trauma/Offense Prevention Program, or STOP, has been run by Lincoln psychologist Dr. Mary Paine since 2000. The program provides individual and group therapy based on a client’s needs.

The program has “enormous value for all of us,” said Lancaster Public Defender Joe Nigro. “I live here too. We all benefit if we reduce the risk to re-offend.”

Earlier this year Gwen Thorpe, deputy chief administrative officer for the Lancaster County Board, termed the program “absolutely necessary in this community.”

County Board members seemed to agree back in January. “You’re providing a well-needed service,” said board chairman Larry Hudkins.

Nonetheless, funds are to run out June 30 and no one has stepped up to make sure the program continues.

The root cause of the dilemma is the county board’s push to privatize services formerly provided at the Community Mental Health Center. But when the request for proposals went out to private agencies, the STOP program was not included, according to Bev Carlson of Lutheran Family Services, which took over in February.

That left the STOP program standing alone. The county has not volunteered to fund the $200,000 cost. The state’s Region V system says it does not have the money. The situation is a classic shortsighted move that could end up costing taxpayers more money.

That’s because some of the program’s clients will have to return to prison or the Regional Center. It costs about $109,000 a year for a patient at the Regional Center, and $40,000 a year for a prison inmate. The outpatient program costs about $6,000 to $8,000 a year per person.

It’s maddening that state and local officials have known for months that the June 30 deadline was coming and still have not come up with a solution.

It’s a case of bureaucracy at its worst. Both the county and the state have potential sources of funding for a public safety program that in the big picture of county and state spending is a relatively small item. Figure it out. ..Source.. by the Journal Star editorial board

Read More of Article...

June 18, 2014

No money for local sex offender program after June 30

6-18-2014 Nebraska:

A Lincoln-based outpatient treatment program that helps keep sex offenders from re-offending may end this summer, because there appears to be no money to keep it running.

By all accounts, the STOP program run by Lincoln psychologist Dr. Mary Paine since 2000 has been successful in reducing the recidivism of people with sexually deviant behavior who are living in the Lincoln area.

“We can’t just have it shut down,” Deputy Lancaster County Public Defender Joe Nigro said, pointing to financial and public safety factors.

The program is a mix of group and individual therapy, based on the need of each client, that helps people adapt after being in prison or at the Lincoln Regional Center, and helps them avoid deviant behavior.

But there will be no funding for about half of the 50-plus clients after June 30 unless something changes.

Without the local program, some clients will have to go back to the Regional Center, or back to prison because they have been ordered by the mental health board to participate in the program.

And the average costs for the Regional Center program ($109,000 a year) and prison ($40,000 a year) are much higher than the $6,000 to $8,000 cost for the Lincoln outpatient program.

In addition, some clients who will remain in the community without any support are more likely to re-offend.

"(The program) has enormous value for all of us," Nigro said. "I live here, too. We all benefit if we reduce the risk to re-offend.”

The two most likely funding sources for the estimated $200,000 cost are the Lancaster County Board and Region V Systems.

Region V Systems, which funds behavioral health services in 16 southeast Nebraska counties with state, local and federal funds, says it has no money for the program.

And Lancaster County commissioners say they shouldn’t be paying for the program, because they already pay $928,000 a year to Region V Systems for local services, far more per county resident than other counties in the southeast region.

The state pays for about half the clients in the program, the 25 patients who have come from the inpatient program at the Regional Center.

Funding for the rest has been a mix from Region V and Lancaster County, according to Dean Settle, retired Community Mental Health Center director.

The STOP program was historically part of the Community Mental Health Center. But when the county privatized the center and its programs were turned over to Lutheran Family Services, the sex offender treatment program was not included, according to all the people involved in the funding discussion.

C.J. Johnson, administrator for Region V, suggested that some of the needed money might come from state sources, perhaps probation, whose clients are part of the STOP program.

Perhaps the Lincoln Regional Center, which has a sex offender line item in its budget, could help with the costs, he said.

"I don't know the answer," said Johnson.

He said he has been very clear over the past three years, during the transition from county-run mental health center to privately run center, that the new provider would not handle the STOP program and that there was no money for it.

“I don’t know why the issue wasn’t dealt with as part of the process when the county closed down the mental health center," said Nigro.

In the past, Settle said, the County Board had made the program a priority because so many sex offenders end up living in Lancaster County after their release from prison or the Regional Center.

In order to protect the public from people who might re-offend, the board wanted to make sure these people had services, that someone was checking on them and making sure they had someone to talk to, Settle said.

"They saw it as a public-safety issue." ..Source.. by Nancy Hicks

Read More of Article...

May 21, 2014

Ex-Wayne State football player gets unanimous pardon for juvenile sex crime

5-21-2014 Nebraska:

Randy Weich knows he can’t escape his past, but on Tuesday he was handed a chance to build a future.

The Nebraska Board of Pardons voted unanimously to pardon Weich for a sex crime he committed as a juvenile but was convicted of as an adult.

The vote prompted cheers, tears and hugs among Weich’s supporters at a hearing in the State Capitol.

More important for Weich, clemency will remove his name from the sex offender registry, which he said revives his dream of playing professional football. Weich, 25, was a standout punter for Wayne State College, and he believes that teams may have withheld free-agent offers because of his criminal status.

“I’m just grateful,” Weich said after the hearing.

The odd circumstances of the conviction, along with Weich’s otherwise exemplary life, persuaded the board to depart from a policy that requires pardon applicants to live crime-free for 10 years after completing their sentences. Weich successfully completed probation in 2007.

“Is this a unique case where we can break our 10-year rule?” asked Attorney General Jon Bruning, a member of the board. “To me, it is.”

The board also rarely grants pardons to sex offenders. But Weich’s crime did not involve a physical assault, which was a mitigating factor for the board.

Gov. Dave Heineman and Secretary of State John Gale are also on the board.

In 2003, when Weich was 14, he and two male classmates made a secret video of three female classmates in the bathroom of Weich’s home in Pierce, Nebraska.

Three years later, the video was discovered by the girls and turned over to police. By then, Weich had turned 18, and he was convicted of two counts of child pornography.

He did not distribute the video and there was no evidence that it was used for sexual gratification. The prosecutor did not charge the two other classmates.

Besides probation, Weich also had his name placed on the sex offender registry for 25 years.

No letters of opposition to Weich’s pardon application were received, said Sonya Fauver, the board’s administrator.

The father of one of the women on the tape told The World-Herald in March that the crime caused psychological harm to his daughter and he resented that Weich never apologized.

After the hearing, Weich said he had been advised by his attorney not to contact the victims at the risk of causing trauma. But he said he is deeply sorry for what he did.

Gale, who said the video had to be humiliating and hurtful to the girls, questioned why Weich didn’t destroy it before it was discovered and turned over to authorities. He also wanted to know if he showed it to others.

Weich said he forgot about the video and denied, under oath, that he ever played it after it was made.

Bruning said had the video been turned over a month earlier, when Weich was still 17, he probably would have been charged as a juvenile.

Psychologists concluded that Weich is not a sexual predator and represents a minimal risk to reoffend. Among those who submitted a record 93 letters in support of Weich’s pardon were his sentencing judge and the psychologist who treated him while he was on probation.

Despite the challenges of being branded a sex offender, Weich stayed in school and obtained a degree in business management from Wayne State.

Whether he gets a shot at professional football or not, he said, he hopes the pardon will allow him to pursue a career in business.

He credited his family and friends with helping him rebuild his life.

“Nobody would let me start sliding,” he said. “That’s the biggest thing.” ..Source.. by Joe Duggan

Read More of Article...

January 24, 2014

County agrees to move sex offender support program

1-24-2014 Nebraska:

Fifty-three sex offenders who receive help from a Lancaster County-operated support program will continue to receive services, despite losing their meeting place.

The Sexual Trauma/Offense Prevention Program (S.T.O.P.) had been offering services at the Community Mental Health Center. However, the Lancaster County Board decided last year to hand over operation of the Community Mental Health Center’s core services to Lutheran Family Services, a nonprofit organization.

The county’s contract with Lutheran Family Services includes use of the Community Mental Health Center building at 2201 S. 17th St. But Lutheran Family Services didn’t agree to take over the S.T.O.P. program, leaving it with nowhere to go.

On Thursday, psychologist Mary Paine, who oversees the S.T.O.P. program through a contract with the county, offered to host the program at her private offices at 1550 S. 70th St., Suite 101. The County Board approved that plan Thursday.

“We are continuing to provide services,” Paine said in a message directed at the program's clients. “We're growing though a series of bumps, but we're still your provider.”

She said S.T.O.P. clients can call her office at 402-488-0077 if they have questions.

The program supports sex offenders who have been released from incarceration, getting referrals from agencies like the Lincoln Regional Center and community corrections. The program works to prevent them from re-offending.

Gwen Thorpe, deputy chief administrative officer for the County Board and acting administrator for the Mental Health Center during the transition, said the county didn’t expect to hand over management of the Mental Health Center’s core services as soon as it now plans -- Feb. 1.

That sooner-than-expected transition left the county unsure what to do with the S.T.O.P. program, she said.

“It's absolutely necessary in this community,” she said.

Paine said many of the program’s clients are high-risk sex offenders who will be listed on the sex offender registry their entire lives.

"It's not just the treatment we provide,” she said. “It's a monitoring function."

If Paine or any of her staff see warning signs that a client might be at high risk of re-offending, they will contact the county attorney’s office, she said.

Ongoing support, like that provided by the S.T.O.P. program, is often a requirement for their release, she said.

County commissioners agreed the program was necessary and should continue.

“You're providing a well-needed service,” said board Chairman Larry Hudkins. ..Source.. by KEVIN ABOUREZK

Read More of Article...

January 13, 2014

Nebraska prisons failing at rehabilitation programs, report finds

Read Report HERE
1-13-2014 Nebraska:

LINCOLN — Nikko Jenkins isn't the only prison inmate who hasn't been prepared to re-enter society.

A new report indicates rehabilitation programs in Nebraska prisons are inadequate and have not kept pace with a growing population of inmates.

The lack of treatment options has exacerbated overcrowding, risks public safety and could violate state laws, according to the report.

Two state senators said they were alarmed by the report, which indicates that only about 13 percent of prison inmates were enrolled in anger management, substance abuse and sex offender treatment.

The report also said about 1 in 7 inmates, or 708, were on waiting lists for treatment. Some inmates were blocked from being paroled because they couldn't get into required rehab.

The lawmakers said the lack of available rehabilitation illustrates a broken and neglected state corrections system, which has seen prison populations grow by 11.5 percent over the past five years but funding increase by only 3.5 percent.

“I've never seen any system quite so broken, and I'm not overstating that,” said State Sen. Brad Ashford of Omaha, who is drafting a bill on prison reform.

“We've got some serious problems,” said Sen. Heath Mello of Omaha. “These offenders are coming back into our neighborhoods, and if they're coming back with substance abuse and mental illness issues they haven't gotten treatment for, they're coming back worse than they came in.”

Gov. Dave Heineman said he is still reviewing the report, released last week by the State Ombudsman's Office.

A spokeswoman for the Corrections Department said the report accounts only for “formal” treatment and doesn't include the full array of routine work done with inmates.

Dawn-Renee Smith, the spokeswoman, said social workers deal with inmates on discharge planning. The report doesn't consider the department's mental health services, which have expanded in recent years.

The agency also has increased its substance abuse beds to 250 and shortened the length of an in-prison drug treatment program to accommodate twice as many inmates, she said.

Smith did not dispute the figures in the ombudsman's report, but she indicated that the department's focus has been on treatment of inmates who have been diagnosed with mental illnesses, which now stands at 33 percent of those behind prison bars.

However, a former state prison warden said that basically “nothing” has kept up with growth in the Nebraska inmate population, other than increased mental health care.

As of Dec. 31, the state prison system held 4,864 inmates, 53 percent above capacity.

Dennis Bakewell, who retired nine months ago, said budget cuts have eliminated programs that allowed inmates to earn college credits while behind bars and to prepare for jobs in welding, auto repair and food service.

Why the lack of funds?

“The constituency are inmates and their families,” Bakewell said. “They aren't voters, they have no political power. … Pretty much no one cares about inmates.”

The Ombudsman's Office investigates complaints about state government agencies. Its report on rehab programs is separate from a report it released last week questioning the lack of treatment provided to Jenkins.

Jenkins stands charged with four slayings in Omaha that authorities allege he committed within three weeks of his July 30 release from prison.

The Ombudsman's Office said Jenkins, a violent and mentally troubled inmate, spent the last two years of his sentence in disciplinary segregation, an isolation cell where inmates do not receive rehab for things like anger management and mental illness.

Jenkins was released “cold” into the community, without any transition from spending 23 hours a day alone in a segregation cell.

Such high-risk, potentially dangerous inmates who have spent time in isolation are most in need of rehabilitation and transition programs, said State Ombudsman Marshall Lux. But his office's report showed a lack of priority for such treatment.

“That's what troubles me,” Lux said. “You need an agency that puts a high value on programming and rehabilitation. That's not something I see in the department right now.”

The ombudsman's report was based on a snapshot of inmates on Sept. 23 who were involved in treatment for sex offender, substance abuse, anger management or violence.

Among the deficits identified:

» In-prison programs for sex offenders, which are 24 to 36 months long, are offered at only one of the state's eight prisons for men, and that facility is in Lincoln.

» The department's outpatient sex offender treatment, called OHelp, is offered at only two facilities, both in Lincoln.

» The anger management program is available only to inmates on community release, not in prison (with the exception of the Nebraska Correctional Youth Facility in Lincoln).

» The violence-reduction program has been offered to only 12 inmates a year, though the department is shortening the program to nine months to open it up to more inmates.

» No rehabilitation of significance is offered to inmates in segregation or protective custody.

In the report, Lux recommended finding ways, such as via video, to provide services to inmates such as Jenkins who are in segregation.

He said rehab programs should be offered in every institution because completing them is often a requirement of parole and early release.

The ombudsman said he has received continued complaints from inmates and their families about being caught in a Catch-22 — they are required to complete a sex offender or anger management class to be paroled but can't get into the class. That means they sit in prison waiting, increasing the inmate population.

Ruben Hardy of Lincoln experienced that firsthand while serving 16 years for robbery.

Hardy, now 54 and a chef and ordained minister, said the Parole Board deferred his release until he completed mental health treatment. Because shorter-term inmates get priority for such programs, Hardy said, he had to wait an extra year before taking the class.

“In the meantime, you're just walking about wondering what you're going to do,” said Hardy, whose ministry includes helping ex-cons transition into society. “There's a real bottleneck.”

Esther Casmer, chairwoman of the State Parole Board, said there are inmates the board won't parole because they haven't obtained required rehabilitation.

She declined to comment on whether the problem is getting worse, and she said sometimes it's the fault of an inmate who refuses to participate or waits too long to sign up for classes.

Casmer said her impression is that corrections is doing the “best it can” within its budget, but she also made it clear that more rehab is needed.

“The Parole Board would like to see the 'perfect world,' where programming is provided equally in every (prison) facility,” she said. “That would make our job easier.”

Does rehab make a difference?

Definitely, said Casmer and Bakewell, the former prison warden.

“Personally, I'd rather have as a neighbor an individual who has gone through programming than one who hasn't,” Casmer said.

Marc Levin, who helped guide a prison reform effort in Texas that allowed the state to close prisons and reduce spending, said increased rehab while in prison was key in the Lone Star State.

It's also a smart move for public safety, Levin said, pointing to a recent Pew Center report indicating that inmates who received proper parole supervision were 40 percent less likely to commit a repeat crime.

The ombudsman, in his report, suggested that the Corrections Department may be in violation of a state law that requires inmates be provided substance abuse therapy before they become eligible for parole, and also given “adequate access” to mental health therapy prior to that date.

Smith, the prison spokeswoman, said the department has shifted some rehab programs to outside prison in order to get inmates released sooner. She said the department gives priority to shorter-term inmates for in-prison rehabilitation, which also is an effort to relieve overcrowding.

Nationally, prisons have seen an influx of mentally ill inmates with the closing of mental health institutions.

In Nebraska, the department recently increased the size of its mental health wing at the Lincoln Correctional Center from 60 to 80 beds and also established a similar 10-bed unit at the women's prison in York. Mental health staffing, though, hasn't changed in five years.

Ashford, who heads the Legislature's Judiciary Committee, pledged to address the rehab problem in a prison reform bill he is drafting.

He said he is looking at bulking up treatment programs and creating an oversight council to ensure that inmates are better prepared to re-enter society.

Ashford said he's also looking at a new research unit at the University of Nebraska at Omaha's School of Criminology and Criminal Justice and the NU Medical Center to better document which rehabilitation programs work and which don't.

The Legislature and Nebraska Supreme Court, Ashford said, have invited the Council of State Governments Justice Center to come to Nebraska and study the problems facing the prison system.

About 2,000 Nebraska inmates are released each year. Ashford and Mello said the prison system needs to shift focus to better prepare them for life on the outside.

“It's a system that's been neglected for a number of years. Right now if nothing is done … we are putting public safety at risk,” Mello said. ..Source.. by Paul Hammel

Read More of Article...

January 11, 2014

Bill would make solicitation of child pornography illegal

1-11-2014 Nebraska:

It would be illegal to solicit child pornography in Nebraska under a bill filed this legislative session.

Sen. Burke Harr of Omaha sponsors the bill.

“Every time someone downloads or attempts to download child pornography, it re-victimizes the child again,” Harr tells reporters during a news conference. “This bill works to hold accountable those who knowingly solicit or attempt to solicit pictures of children, images of children (victims) of sexual assault.”

Current state law only makes possession of child pornography a crime, not solicitation. Attorney General Jon Bruning says the state is careful to make clear distinctions when it prosecutes child pornography.

“When we prosecute child pornography, it’s always prepubescent individuals. These are children,” according to Bruning. “This is never a 15-year-old girl that looks 19. So, when people think what kind of prosecutions are you making, these are very, very clearly prepubescent children. This is the kind of thing that would make most Nebraskans, decent Nebraskans, stomach turn.”

The bill also would expand the definition of child abuse to include making a child view a live sex act. ..Source.. by Brent Martin

Read More of Article...

October 11, 2013

Alexandria leaders reject sex offender ordinance

10-11-2013 Nebraska:

Leaders in the south-central Nebraska village of Alexandria let die an ordinance that would have restricted where sex offenders can live.

A motion to send the ordinance to a full vote of the Alexandria Village Board failed to win a second on Wednesday, said board member Mark Anderson, declining to comment further.

The board gave initial approval to the ordinance Sept. 11, but it needed to survive two more readings.

As written, it would have forbidden registered sex offenders from living within 500 feet of schools, village-owned and maintained parks, licensed day-care centers and any school bus stops on village property. The ordinance also would have levied fines of $500 per day to landlords who rented to sex offenders.

As of Thursday, one registered sex offender was living in the town of 177, according to the Nebraska Sex Offender Registry. Timothy McManaman, 40, pleaded guilty to second-degree sexual assault 14 years ago and served more than two years in prison.

Nebraska ACLU opposed the proposed ordinance, saying it went beyond what state law allows. The group’s legal director, Amy Miller, sent a letter to the village board in September calling on it to reject the proposal.

She said it restricted locations state law doesn’t allow, including village-owned playgrounds or parks and school bus stops on village property. And, Miller said, the ordinance lacked a proper grandfather clause and created a new crime — renting to sex offenders — that state law doesn’t permit.

Nebraska ACLU Executive Director Becki Brenner said Thursday the ordinance would have done little to prevent sexual violence because research shows residency restrictions don’t lead to significant reductions in offenses.

“By deciding not to move forward with an unconstitutional ordinance, the Village of Alexandria can now spend their resources on practices that will actually make the community safer,” she said in a news release. ..Source.. by Kevin Abourezk

Read More of Article...

September 24, 2013

Sex offender restrictions go too far

9-24-2013 Nebraska:

The village board of Alexandria got some valuable advice from the ACLU about its proposed ordinance that would establish new restrictions on where sex offenders could live.

The board ought to take heed. Following the ACLU's recommendations could help the board steer clear of legal travails.

The desire to protect children is understandable. But there's a right way and a wrong way to go about it. The legal restrictions the board is considering go too far.

The board last week gave first-round approval to the ordinance. Two more board votes — scheduled for Oct. 3 and Nov. 13 — are necessary before the ordinance will take effect.

The proposed law for the south-central Nebraska town with a population of 177 would forbid registered sex offenders from living within 500 feet of schools, village -owned and -maintained parks, licensed child care centers and any school bus that stops on village property. The ordinance would fine landlords who rent to sex offenders $500 per day.

As the ACLU pointed out, "The difficulty with the draft is that it goes beyond what state law permits and has been pre-empted by existing statutes — and therefore violates several sections of the Nebraska state Constitution and the United States Constitution."

The ACLU cited three problems with the law. First, the ordinance would restrict sex offenders from living near playgrounds and school bus stops. State law sets restrictions only for schools. Second, the ACLU said, the board must adopt the grandfather clause in state law, not set a new date. Lastly, by setting a penalty for landlords who rent to sex offenders, the ordinance creates a new crime, which is beyond the board's authority.

The board drafted Ordinance 147 at the request of a mother who was concerned about raising her children near registered sex offenders. One offender lives across the alley from her backyard. A second sexual offender with an adjacent backyard moved away after the mother went to the village board.

A few years ago, there was something of a fad among local governments to establish residency restrictions for sex offenders.

Fortunately, the Legislature stepped in to set statewide standards. Otherwise, Nebraska would have ended up with a patchwork of local laws that would have been confusing and unevenly enforced.

For the Alexandria village board to spend more time debating the proposed restrictions would just be wasted effort. If people in Alexandria, or any other town in Nebraska, want tighter restrictions, they need to go to the Legislature. The village board would just be wasting its time. ..Source.. by Lincoln Journal Star

Read More of Article...

September 19, 2013

Sex offender restrictions go too far

9-19-2013 Nebraska:

The village board of Alexandria got some valuable advice from the ACLU about its proposed ordinance that would establish new restrictions on where sex offenders could live.

The board ought to take heed. Following the ACLU's recommendations could help the board steer clear of legal travails.

The desire to protect children is understandable. But there's a right way and a wrong way to go about it. The legal restrictions the board is considering go too far.

The board last week gave first-round approval to the ordinance. Two more board votes -- scheduled for Oct. 3 and Nov. 13 -- are necessary before the ordinance will take effect.

The proposed law for the south-central Nebraska town with a population of 177 would forbid registered sex offenders from living within 500 feet of schools, village -owned and -maintained parks, licensed child care centers and any school bus that stops on village property. The ordinance would fine landlords who rent to sex offenders $500 per day.

As the ACLU pointed out, “The difficulty with the draft is that it goes beyond what state law permits and has been pre-empted by existing statutes -- and therefore violates several sections of the Nebraska state Constitution and the United States Constitution.”

The ACLU cited three problems with the law. First, the ordinance would restrict sex offenders from living near playgrounds and school bus stops. State law sets restrictions only for schools. Second, the ACLU said, the board must adopt the grandfather clause in state law, not set a new date. Lastly, by setting a penalty for landlords who rent to sex offenders, the ordinance creates a new crime, which is beyond the board's authority.

The board drafted Ordinance 147 at the request of a mother who was concerned about raising her children near registered sex offenders. One offender lives across the alley from her backyard. A second sexual offender with an adjacent backyard moved away after the mother went to the village board.

A few years ago, there was something of a fad among local governments to establish residency restrictions for sex offenders.

Fortunately, the Legislature stepped in to set statewide standards. Otherwise, Nebraska would have ended up with a patchwork of local laws that would have been confusing and unevenly enforced.

For the Alexandria village board to spend more time debating the proposed restrictions would just be wasted effort. If people in Alexandria, or any other town in Nebraska, want tighter restrictions, they need to go to the Legislature. The village board would just be wasting its time. ..Source.. by the Journal Star editorial board

Read More of Article...

September 13, 2013

Nebraska village approves strict sex offender ordinance

I wonder if the Village has any jurisdiction to say WHO Landlords can rent to? And if they can, then they can say WHO any business can do business with!
9-13-2013 Nebraska:

Leaders in the south-central Nebraska village of Alexandria gave initial approval to an ordinance that would restrict where sex offenders can live.

Village Board Chairman Steve Deger said the board passed the ordinance on first reading Wednesday evening. It must survive two more readings, set for Oct. 3 and Nov. 13.

The ordinance would forbid registered sex offenders from living within 500 feet of schools, village-owned and maintained parks, licensed day care centers and any school bus stops on village property. The ordinance also would fine landlords who rent to sex offenders $500 per day.

As of Thursday, one registered sex offender was living in the town of 177, according to the Nebraska Sex Offender Registry. Timothy McManaman, 40, pleaded guilty to second-degree sexual assault 14 years ago and served more than two years in prison.

Deger said the proposed law isn't intended to target one person but to protect children and others from sexual predators for as long as it remains in effect.

“I’m more interested in looking down the line than I am targeting a certain individual,” he said.

Opponents of the ordinance, including the ACLU and McManaman’s landlord, say the ordinance would place too much burden on landlords who don’t have control over their tenants’ criminal histories. ..Source.. by KEVIN ABOUREZK

Read More of Article...