Showing posts with label .Registry Stats - Wisconsin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label .Registry Stats - Wisconsin. Show all posts

February 6, 2017

State's sex offender registry is big-time draw

I am sure the author of this article went by what he was told as to statistics and vigilantism, but reality is far different. This states total population is 5,686,986, is 19 million page views a reality? As best we can figure is, somebody is alarming residents telling them to unnecessarily check the registry (also see comments)! We have documented, as of today, 22 major cases of harassment and vigilantism; 6 murder/killing of sex offenders someone needs to enlighten Knutson...
2-6-17 Wisconsin:

Wisconsinites are serious about keeping tabs on the state’s 24,000-plus convicted sex offenders.

Consider this: In 2016, the sections of the state Department of Corrections’ website relating to details on sex offenders generated 19 million page views. In addition, the DOC’s sex offender registry, offender locator and "Wisconsin’s Most Wanted" averaged a combined 481,000 visits per month.

Corrections officials say the sex offender registry has been a go-to resource for citizens to check on everyone from youth sports coaches, to prospective babysitters and daycare providers, to adults who direct children’s plays and musicals.

“It’s helpful,” said Grace Knutson, director of sex offender programs for the Department of Corrections. “They are using it as it was intended.”

Of the 24,457 offenders who were on the Wisconsin registry as of mid-January, 5,914 were incarcerated, 5,814 were on community supervision and 12,729 were off community supervision, according to Tristan Cook, communications director for the DOC.

“The registry in Wisconsin works very well,” said Matt Kuether, an investigator with the Appleton Police Department.

The number of sex offender registrants – both on and off supervision – is about 275 in Appleton, he said.

“The biggest thing I talk to people about (is) the registry is an informational tool. It’s not meant to be a punishment,” Kuether said.

Professor: Registries are 'worthless'

While sex offender registries have been in place nationwide since the 1990s, some contend that they do more harm than good.

“I think they’re terrible and worthless – worse than worthless. They are damaging,” said Emily Horowitz, professor and chairperson of the Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice at St. Francis College in Brooklyn, N.Y.

“There’s no evidence that they decrease (the number of) sex offenders or have made anyone safer,” Horowitz said.

The vast majority of victims are assaulted by someone they know – not by a stranger, she said.

“There’s a culture of fear. We are all scared all the time and the registries affect that fear. They think sex predators are around every corner, and that’s not true,” Horowitz said.

Horowitz said she doesn’t oppose punishment for sex offenders, but contends that being on a publicly available list can create difficulties.

“If you are on the registry, you will never be able to change your life,” she said. “They have wives and families, and they are publicly branded (as sex offenders). Nobody has any sympathy for them."

Vigilantism concerns unfounded

Wisconsin’s sex offender registry has grown significantly over the years. In 1998, there were 10,000 offenders on the list. Now, the list has swelled beyond 24,500 – roughly the size of the city of Neenah.

Knutson, the DOC’s sex offender program director, said 25 to 75 new registrants are added each month. The number of offenders on the registry remains stable because two-thirds are on the list for life, she said.

When the public was given access to names and addresses more than a decade ago, some feared that it could lead to incidents of vigilantism. But that hasn’t happened, according to Knutson.
“We haven’t seen the (sex offender registry) used for anything other than (it was intended),” she said.

Kuether, the Appleton police investigator, said vigilantism “hasn’t been an issue.”

“I cannot think of any person who was harassed
,” he said. ..Source.. by Andy Thompson

Read More of Article...

May 26, 2014

Milwaukee bears unfair brunt of sex offender placements, Murphy says

5-26-2014 Wisconsin:

Data shows 90% of county's sex offenders live in Milwaukee

Legislation enacted by many Milwaukee County communities that restricts residency for sex offenders is having a disproportionate impact on the city of Milwaukee.

That is the assessment of Common Council President Michael Murphy, who with the help of the city's Legislative Reference Bureau analyzed sex offender registry data collected by the state.

Murphy said the data shows that as of mid-February, 21,669 offenders were on the registry statewide. Of that number, 2,399 sex offenders were living in Milwaukee County, and 2,138 of those were living in the city of Milwaukee.

"It is apparent that the City of Milwaukee has become the primary location for the placement of sex offenders within Milwaukee County," Murphy wrote in a letter to state Corrections Secretary Edward F. Wall.

According to the analysis, 14 of the 19 Milwaukee County municipalities have ordinances on the books that restrict sex offender residency.

"The establishment of (the) restrictions by suburban communities may be the reason for the concentration of sex offenders residing in the City of Milwaukee," Murphy said.

Moreover, an analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau showed that the number of sex offenders living in two Milwaukee ZIP codes had increased since municipalities in Milwaukee County voted to enact restrictive ordinances.

According to the analysis, the total number of registered sex offenders living within the 53207 and 53215 ZIP codes in 2007 was 161. Seven years later, the total number of sex offenders in those two ZIP codes had increased to 233, a 44.7% jump.

"Your department should support enacting state law to require that sex offender residency restriction be applied statewide to remove the patchwork of varying residency restriction laws," Murphy wrote to Wall. Murphy also recommended that placement of sex offenders in the city be discontinued until a fair solution can be found.

Two bills — one in 2005 and one in 2007 — attempted to level the playing field statewide but did not pass.

"Inaction by the State of Wisconsin and the Department of Corrections... indicates that it does not fully appreciate the negative impacts on the health, safety and welfare of Milwaukee residents that could result from the continued concentration of sex offenders residing in the City of Milwaukee," Murphy said.

Grace Roberts, director of sex offender programs for the Department of Corrections, suggested to Murphy that he speak with local and elected officials to change laws governing residency restriction ordinances.

Murphy's data came from an open records request filed by the Milwaukee city clerk's office with the state's sex offender program.

In Milwaukee County, only Whitefish Bay, River Hills, Shorewood, Milwaukee and Hales Corners have no restrictions. The remainder have restrictions that prohibit sex offenders from living 500 feet to 2,000 feet away from such places as schools or other educational institutions.

Murphy's request also found that because the Wisconsin Sex Offender Registry is updated frequently, "no reports of the registry are retained for historical purposes." The Legislative Reference Bureau had some partial historical data for ZIP codes 53207 and 53215, which is used to compare with current state sex offender data to calculate the increase in the number of sex offenders living in those two areas.

Murphy suggested a records retention policy should be established.

The review of data also found numerous examples of inaccurate or incomplete records for certain sex offenders. "The integrity of the Wisconsin Sex Offender Registry is being undermined by the lack of historical data and the errors and inconsistencies identified in the current data," Murphy said.

Roberts responded that prior to April 28, the agency had used a database dating back to 1998. "The database was limited in its capabilities for capturing historical numbers of registrants and lists of sex offender registrant information," she said.

Since April 28, she said, the agency unveiled a new database that includes the ability to generate sex offender registry information. The new database also has a process to check for the validity of addresses. ..Source.. by Don Walker

Read More of Article...