The social costs of juveniles on sex-offender registries far outweigh benefits

9-30-15 National:

WASHINGTON (Sept. 29, 2015) – The net social cost of applying sex-offender registration and notification laws to those who commit offenses as juveniles could be as high as $3 billion a year, with most of those costs incurred by neighbors of registered offenders, according to a new benefit-cost analysis from the R Street Institute.

Author and R Street Associate Fellow Richard B. Belzer found that including juveniles in sex-offender registries produced net costs of between -$40 million and -$1 billion per year, while only reducing sex-offense recidivism by about one-eighth.

“Registration would have to reduce incidence by at least 60 percent to yield positive net benefits,” Belzer wrote. “Incidence reductions of this magnitude has not been observed anywhere, or even suggested by committed registration advocates.”

Applying notification laws to juvenile offenders produces no identifiable social benefits, with social costs that range from $400 million to $2 billion per year. About 75 percent of notification costs are actually incurred by neighbors.

“The analysis shows that public notification is almost certainly a highly cost-ineffective way to reduce future sex offenses,” Belzer wrote. “No evidence has been found indicating that there are any social benefits. Thus, reform of notification laws appears to be the most plausible class of reform alternative that warrants consideration from an economic-efficiency perspective.”

The paper offers a retrospective analysis the draws from the literature on the effects of federal laws like the Adam Walsh Act and Megan’s Law, as well as state sex-offender registries, to outline costs borne by various entities, including the registrants themselves, their families, homeowners, renters and landlords, businesses, schools and the public.

Belzer also uses a prospective benefit-cost analysis that could use reforms to lessen some of the costs associated with the registry. These include exempting certain groups of offenders, terminating new registrations for certain kinds of offenders or enacting stays of notification pending future good conduct.

“The mere presence of information in the public domain means that the costs to juvenile offenders of public notifica­tion are, for all practical purposes, already sunk,” Belzer writes. “Nearly all benefits from reform will accrue from the non-registration or nondisclosure of registry status of new juvenile offenders.” ..Source.. by Nicole Roeberg

Read More of Article...

Article Summary only...

Ky. Law Shields Some Sex Offenders From Registries

In all states juveniles are handled differently in the criminal justice system. However, this article suggests, if a juvenile is convicted of a sex offense, then they must be handled like an adult. What happened to reviewing the facts of a case before DECLARING the person GUILTY, which is exactly what is being suggested here. Further, simply being required to register and placed on the public registry DOES NOT automatically mean the person is dangerous, again suggested in this article.

9-20-2010 Kentucky:

(LOUISVILLE) -- Sex offenders -- their crimes are heinous, and the chances they will strike again are disturbingly high. Usually, sex offender registries let you know who to look out for. But WAVE 3 Investigator Eric Flack has uncovered one group of sex offenders whose identities are protected. In fact, someone from this list could be living right next door, and you would never know.

Sex offenders are seen as such a threat, such a danger to you and your children, websites allow you to find out where they are, right down to the street number.

But there is a group of sex offenders hidden from the public. A group of rapists, pedophiles and child molesters, that get special protection from the law.

Juvenile sex offenders.

Bridget Skaggs Brown, Commissioner of the Department of Juvenile Justice, says Kentucky's laws for Juvenile sex offenders are much less strict than the adult offenders.

In Kentucky, there are at least 232 sex offenders under the age of 18, and 38 in Louisville Metro and the surrounding areas. But because they are juveniles, their trials and records are closed to the public. All convictions are kept secret.

"People could be living next door to a sex offender, and have small children, and they won't know that," Brown said in an exclusive interview with WAVE 3.

She went on to say that problems in the system go even deeper than that. Under current Kentucky law, the maximum sentence a juvenile sex offender can receive is just three years in a youth detention center.

"That's not much," Brown admitted.

Three years for crimes that can carry sentences of up to life in prison for adults.

In 1993, Jeremy Gipson was 15 when he was convicted of raping a 7-year-old boy in Louisville. But secrecy laws kept Gipson's past hidden from everyone, including the parents of 12-year-old Jessica Thornsberry.

Two years after his rape conviction, when he was 17, Gipson raped, sodomized and strangled young Jessica, then dumped her body in Iroquois Park.

Unaware of his dark secret, Jessica's family willingly let her go to Gipson's home the night of the murder.

"Oh yeah, we're all bitter about it," said Jessica's grandmother, Louise Hume, in a 1998 interview. "And it doesn't get any easier."

Driven by cases like Jessica's, the Kentucky Coalition Against Sexual Assaults, a task force co-chaired by Brown, wants to strengthen the state's laws for juvenile sex offenders.

The proposal includes provisions to:

•Eliminate the 3-year limit on sentencing and treatment.

•Automatically waive the most serious cases to adult court.

•Adding juveniles convicted of the most serious sex crimes to the public sex offender registry.

The third provision is raising controversy, and Dr. Charles Thomas, a psychiatrist who treats sex offenders, has serious concerns.

"I really have a strong objection to treating youth who offended as adults," Dr. Thomas said.

He says while teens are capable of committing the same acts as adults, they are often unable to understand the seriousness and consequences of their crimes. Treat juvenile sex offenders like adults, he says, and you lose any chance to rehabilitate them.

"If you label youth who sexually offend with that scarlet letter, and if they are permanently stigmatized for the rest of their life with that, they are not going to have the opportunity to re-integrate back into society," Thomas said.

The debate hits home for Steve and Susie Hiland of Germantown.

"Anytime that there is somebody out there that can hurt your kids, that you don't know about, you're at a disadvantage," Susie said.

With four young kids, the Hilands say they are torn between the need to protect their own, and the need to preserve laws protecting juvenile sex offenders.

"Hopefully, most juveniles given a second chance, once they become adults, wont be recidivists," Steve said.

But those calling for change say: history proves otherwise.

"Just because they're a juvenile, doesn't mean they're not dangerous," said Brown.

The Kentucky legislature will have to vote on and pass any changes to the state's juvenile sex offender laws. That debate is expected to take place next year.

In 2003, Indiana changed its laws, and now puts juveniles convicted of sex offenses on its sex offender registry. Other states across the nation have done the same. ..Source.. Eric Flack

Read More of Article...

Article Summary only...

Tennessee Senate drops juvenile sex offender registry

6-4-2010 Tennessee:

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) - The Senate sponsor of a measure to create a juvenile sexual offender registry has withdrawn the measure because the House decided against funding it.

Republican Sen. Diane Black of Gallatin said she was disappointed that the bill won't become law this year.

Black said there has been "a lot of misrepresentation" about the bill. She said information about the worst juvenile sex crimes are already public record.

Democratic Sen. Eric Stewart of Belvidere said he supported the measures. In his words: "We protect the wrong kids sometimes, we need to protect the right kids." ..Source.. by WMC TV.com

Read More of Article...

Article Summary only...