Showing posts with label Teenage Behavior. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Teenage Behavior. Show all posts

July 2, 2010

Teen Sex

7-2-2010 Showtime Channel:

Penn and Teller are not only world-famous comedians and magicians, they're also die-hard skeptics. Each episode takes topics such as abstinence, life coaching, cryptozoology, 12-step programs and psychics and uses principles of magic and trickery - as well as good ol' fashioned hidden camera sting operations - to smoke out ``nonsense peddlers'' and reveal how they operate.

Tonight's episode was about "Teen Sex" and covered every aspect of the issues advocates face with all these sex offender laws. While their language is errrr (graphic) so were a few of the scenes, revealing.



The show lasted about 25 minutes and was really good and mentions more stats which Advocates can draw on. The show was on SHOWTIME and future dates follow, check your local listings to see if they are the same:

Adults take drastic measures to combat the perceived dangers of teen promiscuity.

Sat 7/3 12:30-1:00am
Sun 7/4 1:15-1:45am
Mon 7/5 12:00-12:30am
Tue 7/6 12:00-12:30am
Wed 7/7 9:00-9:30pm
Wed 7/7 11:00-11:30pm

Read More of Article...

July 24, 2009

IL- Teens turn to Internet for sex ed

7-24-2009 Illinois:

CHICAGO, Ill. - It's part of growing up, that conversation with an adult about the birds and the bees, but in the 21st century, your teenagers' new sex-ed teacher, may be the Internet.

It's an awkward time, those teenage years.

Talking about sex can be among the most embarrassing moments. In fact, the CDC reports that one in three teens say they've never received information about birth control, which doesn't surprise University of Chicago gynecologist Melissa Gilliam.

"Certainly in early adolescence, 11, 12 and 13 that can be a very difficult time for children to discuss sex," said Gilliam.
In the 21st century, there's a new sex ed class on the Internet.

It can teach safe sex MTV style or less raucous sites like Scarleteen.com and even YouTube.com.

Virtual sex ed is so popular, Columbia College and the University of Chicago have held symposiums about it.

Now there's even a web site that's selling home test kits for two of the most common STDs, Chlamydia and gonorrhea.

Tracey Powell is the CEO of Chicago-based Getstdtested.com.

"These young adults, they live on line. So they prefer to having ordering as well as the results delivered on line," said Powell.

The tests arrive in the mail, so you can take them yourselves.

You mail it back to a lab and in a few days you get an e-mail back.

A positive test result will direct you to free advice by phone, or on the Internet and that kind of help is clearly necessary.

The CDC says that in 2006 one million young people age ten to 24 had Chlamydia, gonorrhea or syphilis.

"Chlamydia is important because it can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, long term pelvic pain." Said Gilliam.

Dr. Gilliam also worries that an anonymous test, and help offered by phone may not be enough for teens to get treatment, or make necessary changes.

"There are concerns that maybe consulting over the phone or thru the Internet is not as effective as face to face consulting," Gilliam said.

As parents also wrestle with the awkward years, there's one way to filter through sex ed on the web.

Dr. Gilliam says limit it to sites that end in dot-gov, or dot-edu, a site for educational institutions.

"If there is a question that a parent couldn't answer but they could go to a trusted site and get that information, that would be a terrific tool," said Gilliam. ..Source.. by KNDO.com

Read More of Article...

June 30, 2009

Teens Who Think They'll Die Young Take More Risks

6-30-2009 National:

Teenagers tend to wildly overestimate the odds of dying young, and teenagers who think they'll be dead before age 35 are far more likely to abuse drugs, attempt suicide, get arrested, or contract HIV. Scientists have known for quite a while that teenagers tend to think that an early death is much more likely than the infinitesimally small risk it really is. What's recently been discovered, and is intriguing for teens and the people who love them, is that there seems to be a connection between having a fatalistic take on life and behaving in ways that actually make it more likely that you will die—or at least be sick and miserable—instead of blossoming into a healthy young adult.

Here's the back story: When 20,745 teenagers in grades 7 to 12 were asked about their chances of living to age 35, about 15 percent of them said there was at least a fifty-fifty chance that they would not make it. In truth, the odds of dying that young are almost vanishingly small. Interestingly, it seems that death is uniquely confounding as a risk, because teenagers aren't off base when guessing their chances of other life-changing events, including getting pregnant, becoming a parent, being a victim of violence, or being jailed.

I think most of us parents tend to worry, on the contrary, that teenagers have a grandiose sense that they are invulnerable—that teenage "myth of invulnerability." But scientists who study human behavior and risk long ago punctured that myth. Baruch Fischhoff, a psychologist at Carnegie Mellon University who pioneered research on risk and decision making, says that teenagers may feel more strongly than adults do that life is beyond their control.

Given that, it's not hard to see how a fatalistic teenager could decide that risky behavior just isn't worth avoiding. The new data, which came from the University of Minnesota and were published in the July Pediatrics, found that teens who anticipated an early death when first asked in 2005 were more likely to have made a suicide attempt, been injured in a fight, had unsafe sex, or been arrested a year later. They were also more likely to have been diagnosed with HIV or AIDS in 2001 or 2002. This correlation gives doctors a new way to screen teenagers for the likelihood of coming to harm, the Minnesota researchers say, something that is surprisingly difficult to do. Parents, teachers, and coaches could ask if a child thinks early death is likely, correct the misperception if so, and explain that, since a long life is far more likely, it makes sense to take good care of oneself now.

There's an even sadder subtext to these data: Some fatalistic teenagers were more on target than others. Minority teenagers were far more likely to predict an early death, with 29 percent of Native Americans, 26 percent of blacks, and 21 percent of Hispanics expecting to die young, compared with 10 percent of whites. The fatalistic teens were also more likely to be poor. Minorities and poor people are far more likely to have health problems than someone who is white and well off.

There's been a lot of news lately about teenagers and mental health, including a call for depression screening of all teenagers by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Teenagers do indeed see the world much differently from adults, and I'm fascinated at how the teenage brain can be amazingly powerful, while also making teenagers do really dumb things. Think you know the teen brain? Try this teen brain quiz. ..Source.. by Nancy Shute

Read More of Article...

January 8, 2009

Teen pregnancy back on the rise, CDC says

1-8-2009 Colorado:

The teen birthrate rose in more than half of states in '06. Colorado's rate edged up slightly.

The nation's teen pregnancy rate has increased for the first time in 15 years, leaving pregnancy-prevention experts wondering whether their tactics have fatigued.

"It may be that one of the great success stories in this nation of the past two decades may be coming to a close," said Bill Albert with the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. "I think it is cause for great concern."

The teen birthrate increased in more than half of states in 2006, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's latest data, released Wednesday.

In Colorado, the rate change wasn't statistically significant, but local experts say that's no reason to sigh in relief.

That's because Colorado lagged behind the rest of the nation in bringing down teen birthrates over the 15-year period.

While the national rate declined 32 percent from 1991 to 2006, Colorado's teen birthrate went down 24 percent.

"We haven't kept up," said Shannon Sainer, with the Colorado Organization on Adolescent Pregnancy, Parenting and Prevention. "There is a lot more work to be done."

She cited a lack of funding and political disagreement about sex education among the reasons for Colorado's lagging progress. Colorado's rate was 43.8 births per 1,000 teen girls in 2006, compared with 42.6 the previous year, according to CDC statistics.

That's higher than the national average of 41.9. And some Colorado counties are far above the national average, including Denver at 71 births per 1,000 teen girls and Otero County at 80.3.

States with the highest rates of decline — including California and New York — have statewide sex-education standards focused on abstinence and contraception, Sainer said.

Births to mothers ages 15 to 19 reached a four-decade high in 1990, when the national rate was 117 pregnancies per 1,000 teen girls.

A steady decline followed, as pregnancy prevention efforts intensified and President Bill Clinton suggested in his State of the Union speech that teen pregnancy was among the nation's most pressing social problems.

But that rate of decline began to slow in the early 2000s, said Stephanie Ventura, one of the authors of the report from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics.

"That was probably an early warning sign," she said.

Now experts fear the teen birthrate may have bottomed out.

"We hope that this does serve as a wake-up call of sorts," Albert said. "All of our efforts going forward will need to be more creative and more intense."

The CDC's figures show teen birthrates were highest in the South and Southwest — Mississippi had the highest with 68.4 births per 1,000 teen girls. Rates were lowest in the Northeast, with New Hampshire at the top with 18.7 births per 1,000 teen girls. ..News Source.. by Jennifer Brown, The Denver Post

Read More of Article...

June 22, 2008

Survey of Internet and At-Risk Behaviors

June 2008

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
f n May 2007 through January 2008 fourteen Monroe County school districts in New York State participated in a major research study undertaken by the Rochester Institute of Technology (RlT). A major portion of the study was an online survey. lt was designed to.

Measure the nature and extent of online victimization and offending experiences of K-12th grade students; Determine types and levels of supervision and role modeling employed by parents pertaining to the use of computers and portable electronic devices by their children; and Obtain information from teachers about their perceptions of school-related cyber abuse and crime, along with the potential need and challenges associated with implementing cyber safety and ethics instruction.

The survey project was the initial basis for establishing a partnership among RIT and approximately thirty school districts from throughout the Greater Rochester New York area, along with three prominent national organizations, including: (1)the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), (2) the Information Systems Security Association (ISSA), and (3) Rochester InfraGard Member Alliance. InfraGard is an information sharing and analysis effort serving the interests and combining the knowledge base of a wide range of members.

These organizations initially joined forces in August of 2006 and eventually formed the Rochester Regional Cyber Safety and Ethics Initiative (RRCSEI). Monroe County school districts was actively involved in helping to create the RRCSEI, and shaping its mission of "advancing K-12 cyber safety and ethics education along with parent and workforce training in these topics through research, instructional programming, professional development, evaluation and public awareness." Thereafter, Monroe County districts and numerous other area school districts agreed during the fall months of 2006 to participate in what became the R/f Survey of lnternet and At-risk Behaviors.

This report explains how the survey project was designed and administered. lt summarizes the results of Monroe County districts' student, parent and teacher versions of the survey and makes recommendations for staff development, instructional intervention and outreach to parents. This report is one of three being provided by RIT to Monroe County districts as part the RRCSEI study. Other reports to be provided to districts are (1) a district level analysis of survey findings report and (2) a Content Analysis Report of available online instructional resources that school districts may wish to consider using as a basis for providing lnternet safety, information security and cyber ethics education. ..Source.. by Rochester Institute of Technology

Read More of Article...

May 20, 2008

A Debunking on Teenagers and 'Technical Virginity'

Researchers Find That Oral Sex Isn't Commonplace Among Young People Who Avoid Intercourse

5-20-2008 National:

Contrary to widespread belief, teenagers do not appear to commonly engage in oral sex as a way to preserve their virginity, according to the first study to examine the question nationally.

The analysis of a federal survey of more than 2,200 males and females aged 15 to 19, released yesterday, found that more than half reported having had oral sex. But those who described themselves as virgins were far less likely to say they had tried it than those who had had intercourse.

"There's a popular perception that teens are engaging in serial oral sex as a strategy to avoid vaginal intercourse," said Rachel Jones of the Guttmacher Institute, a private, nonprofit research organization based in New York, who helped do the study. "Our research suggests that's a misperception."

Instead, the study found that teens tend to become sexually active in many ways at about the same time. For example, although only one in four teenage virgins had engaged in oral sex, within six months after their first intercourse more than four out of five adolescents reported having oral sex.

"That suggests that oral and vaginal sex are closely linked," said Jones, whose findings will be published in the July issue of the Journal of Adolescent Health. "Most teens don't have oral sex until they have had vaginal sex."

Proponents of sex-education programs that focus on abstinence said the findings debunked the criticism that the approach was inadvertently prompting more teens to have oral sex, which still carries the risk of sexually transmitted disease, in order to preserve their virginity.

"This study . . . invalidates the suggestion that 'technical virgins' account for the rise in oral and anal sex," said Valerie Huber, executive director of the National Abstinence Education Association. "Sexually experienced teens were almost four times more likely to engage in oral sex and 20 times more likely to engage in anal sex than their peers who were virgins."

If anything, the findings support the need to encourage more teens to delay sexual activity of all kinds, she said.

"This report reveals that teen sex -- even with a condom -- presents significant risk for future sexual experimentation and so underscores the need for redoubled emphasis on abstinence education for teens," she said. "Only abstinence education adequately addresses this problem."

But critics of abstinence programs said the findings reinforced the need for comprehensive sex education, because teens engage in a wide variety of sexual activities, all of which can spread sexually transmitted diseases.

"More than half of our teens are having sex -- vaginal and oral," said James Wagoner, president of the group Advocates for Youth. "We can't afford the luxury of denial. Abstinence-only programs are the embodiment of denial. They have been proven not to work, and it's time to invest in real sex education, including condoms."

Others praised the research for providing much-needed data in the often highly polarized debate over teenage sexuality.

"We have these images of oral sex parties, but it's not based on evidence. It's not based on research," said Claire Brindis, a professor of pediatrics and health policy at the University of California at San Francisco. "A study like this allows us to begin to dissect what actually is going on. It really helps to break both the positive and negative stereotypes."

Previous research had suggested that oral sex was increasing among teenagers as an alternative to intercourse, but those studies were based on small samples or anecdotal reports. The new study analyzed data collected from a nationally representative sample of 1,150 females and 1,121 males aged 15 to 19 who were questioned in detail in 2002 for the federal government's National Survey of Family Growth.

A majority of the teens -- 55 percent -- said they had engaged in oral sex, which was slightly more than the 50 percent who said they had had vaginal sex. But oral sex was much more common among those who already had had intercourse: Eighty-seven percent of those who reported on a computerized questionaire that they had had vaginal sex said they had engaged in oral sex as well, compared with 23 percent of those who described themselves as virgins.

When the researchers examined the timing of sexual behaviors, they found that among those who said during face-to-face interviews that had had vaginal sex in the past six months, 82 percent said they also had had oral sex, compared with 26 percent of the virgins.

Among those who had initiated vaginal sex more than three years earlier, 92 percent had engaged in oral sex.

Jones noted that the analysis could not determine which sexual activity tended to occur first.

When the researchers examined the number of partners the teens reported, they found that among those who reported engaging in oral sex, 67 percent had only one partner, "another piece of evidence that there's not a lot of teens engaging in serial oral sex," Jones said.

In addition to the implications for sex-ed classes, the findings indicate that parents should talk with their children more about a variety of sexual activities, experts said.

"When parents talk with children and teenagers about sex, they may need to broaden the number of topics they discuss," said Sarah Brown of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, a private nonprofit advocacy group. "They have to embrace the 'ick' factor. They have to face the facts." ..more.. by Rob Stein, Washington Post Staff Writer

Read More of Article...

Non-coital sexual activities among adolescents

December 2007

Abstract
Purpose. While prior research has demonstrated that many adolescents engage in non-coital sexual behavior, extant peer-reviewed studies have not used nationally representative data or multivariate methods to examine these behaviors. We used data from Cycle 6 of National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) to explore factors related to oral and anal sex among adolescents.

Methods. Data come from 2,271 females and males aged 15-19 in 2002. Computer-assisted self-administered interviews were used to collect sensitive information, including whether respondents had ever engaged in vaginal, oral or anal sex. We used t-tests and multivariate logistic regression to test for differences and identify independent characteristics associated with experience with oral or anal sex.

Results. 54% of adolescent females and 55% of adolescent males have ever had oral sex, and one in 10 has ever had anal sex. Both oral sex and anal sex were much more common among adolescents who had initiated vaginal sex as compared to virgins. The initiations of vaginal and oral sex appear to occur closely together; by 6 months after first vaginal intercourse, 82% of adolescents also engaged in oral sex. The strongest predictor of anal sex involvement was time since initiation of vaginal sex and the likelihood of anal sex increased with greater time since first vaginal intercourse. White and higher SES teens were more likely than their peers to have ever had oral or anal sex.

Conclusions. Health professionals and sexual health educators should address non-coital sexual behaviors and STI risk, understanding that non-coital behavior commonly co-occur with coital behaviors. ..more..

by Laura Duberstein Lindberg, Ph.D., Senior Research Associate, Guttmacher Institute.; and, Rachel Jones, Ph.D., Senior Research Associate, Guttmacher Institute.; and John S. Santelli, M.D., Professor and Chair, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University. Senior Fellow, Guttmacher Institute.

Read More of Article...

February 20, 2008

Blame the amygdala for typical teenage behavior

Ask any parent — a teen's behavior can be attributed to anything, everything or nothing. But recent research on brain development and activity offers some answers.

Even though most brain development — 90 to 95 percent — occurs during the first six years of life, there's an additional brain growth spurt around ages 10 to 12. After that, up to age 20, researchers say, there's additional pruning, organizing and other changes in the brain. During this developmental period, brain activity often manifests itself in emotional outbursts, irrational decision-making, rigid thinking and general disorganization.

Researchers at the National Institutes of Mental Health, Harvard University, and other institutions have used brain-imaging techniques to examine both brain activity and development in adolescents and teens. It appears that the brain's frontal lobe, where people process emotions, continues to develop into the early 20s and is normally the "first responder" in adult decision-making and judgment calls.

Teenagers, on the other hand, tend to rely more on a part of the brain called the "amygdala," part of the limbic system that is associated with instinctive gut reactions, including what's known as the "fight or flight" response. Because of that, they're more likely to react quickly and misinterpret facial expressions of emotion. For example, they could possibly see anger in another person when, in actuality, there is none. You might also see the amygdala at work in your teen's rapid mood changes, impulsiveness, high level of emotion and even risk-taking behavior.

As teens become young adults, activity shifts from the amygdala to the frontal lobe, allowing more control over emotions and impulses.

For parents, simply knowing that normal brain development is a likely cause of their teens' seemingly irrational behavior can be a relief. But you can do things to help smooth the transition to adulthood. For example:
< Provide opportunities for teens to use their "thinking brains" for planning, analyzing, organizing, problem-solving and making decisions. Understand they have a need to become more independent and self-sufficient, but also still need positive interactions with adults.
< Listen, encourage and support your teenagers. Don't overreact if they have an outburst, but have clear and consistent boundaries and expectations for behavior.
< Provide opportunities for enriching experiences and healthy risks, including sports, jobs, challenging studies. Limit use of television and video games if they interfere with other activities that permit healthy socialization, physical activity or real-life problem-solving.

(Kim Asche is a 4-H youth development educator with University of Minnesota Regional Extension in Hutchinson.) ..more.. By Kim Asche, University of Minnesota Extension

Read More of Article...