Showing posts with label Community Notification. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Community Notification. Show all posts

September 29, 2010

County says law limits sex offender e-mail notification plan

If anyone understands EXACTLY what law prohibits what they want to do, please contact eAdvocate. Whatever this prohibition is, it may also affect ALL the iPhone type Offender locator programs, hopefully stop them.
9-29-2010 California:

San Diego County is launching a one-year pilot program to inform neighborhoods by e-mail whenever the status of a registered sex offender living near them changes.

County Supervisor Bill Horn had proposed a more extensive notification that would have provided the offender's name, photo and address.

That was scuttled, however, when the state Attorney General's office told county officials that such detailed notification regarding a specific offender being disseminated by county e-mail violated state law.

County Counsel John Sansone said Tuesday discussions between his office, the county District Attorney and the Attorney General made it clear the law prohibits what Horn wanted. More precise information on how the law prohibits dissemination of that information by targeted e-mail was not immediately available.

"We are protecting the wrong people and the law needs to catch up with technology," Horn said. "The penal code is behind technology, really. We have some dangerous predators out there."

What the county can do, said Greg Thompson, a senior policy adviser with the Sheriff's Department, is send out an e-mail alert that an offender's status has changed, directing recipients to the California Megan's Law website that tracks registered sex offenders.

San Diego County has about 4,000 registered sex offenders with roughly 25 percent of that number under some form of supervision such as parole, Thompson said.

Supervisors unanimously approved spending $20,000 to develop the e-mail system and agreed to review how it's working after a year.

They also agreed to make it a priority to lobby to change that aspect of state law that prohibits the detailed, targeted e-mail. ..Source.. by Mark Walker

Read More of Article...

September 15, 2008

UK- Parents to be given right to find out details about sex offenders in contact with their children

9-15-2008 United Kingdom:

Parents will from today be able to ask police whether anyone who has access to their child is a convicted paedophile or is even suspected of abusing children.

Police will pass on details of any relevant criminal convictions and may include ‘soft intelligence’ detailing unproven complaints of abuse, even where there was no finding of guilt.

But parents will face civil court action or even criminal charges for inciting violence if they gossip about the findings or pass on the restricted material to other parents whose children could be at risk.

The measures are aimed at parents who are worried about those who spend time with their children, such as neighbours or sports coaches, or single mothers anxious to know more about a new boyfriend’s background.

The initiative, which starts today in four pilot areas across England, was drawn up by the Home Office in response to demands for ‘Sarah’s Law’ to make available more information on known paedophiles, following the murder of Sarah Payne by convicted sex offender Roy Whiting.

Twelve-month trials are being held in Peterborough, Southampton, Stockton in Cleveland and across Warwickshire, and the measures will be extended across England and Wales if judged a success.

The Home Office said police would also deal with inquiries about under-18s – to cover babysitters for example. They said ‘special considerations’ would apply in such cases, but could give no details.

If the checks uncover paedophile convictions, the scheme sets out an ‘assumption’ that parents should be informed.

But police and child protection agencies will have more discretion about past complaints which did not lead to a successful prosecution, or of past convictions for non-sexual crimes such as child neglect or domestic violence.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith claimed the scheme was a ‘huge step forward’ which would ‘empower’ worried parents to protect-their children better.

But campaigner Donald Findlater, of child protection charity the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, said: ‘The biggest risk to children is not from the registered sex offender who the police know and are managing.

‘It is from the sex offender who is not registered and who no one knows about.

‘There are probably ten of these unknown individuals to every one registered offender.


Paul Cavadino, director of crime reduction charity Nacro, welcomed the rules in principle but said: ‘The real test of these pilots will be whether this information can be kept confidential to the parents or whether it spreads to other people, causing a risk of vigilante attacks.

‘If this happened it could drive offenders underground, making it difficult for the police and probation service to keep track of them and increasing risk to other children.’

Sara Payne, Sarah’s mother, welcomed the moves, but said there was far more still to do, adding: ‘This is a giant step towards truth and honesty when dealing with sex offenders and all we need now is for local communities up and down the UK to help make this work.’ ..News Source.. by Matthew Hickley

Read More of Article...

UK- Will sex offender pilots work?

9-15-2008 United Kingdom:

This week, EastEnders on BBC One begins the first ever predatory paedophile storyline in a British soap.

Bianca's knight in shining armour, Tony, turns out to be more interested in her teenage daughter Whitney.

He has been preying on a vulnerable mum to get closer to a girl he has coveted since they first met.

Monday also sees four constabularies launch pilots of a sex offender disclosure scheme.

Paedophile

Nobody is pretending that these pilots are going to be easy - but ministers believe the pilots may help stop predatory paedophiles before they strike.

The disclosure scheme is aimed at parents, carers or guardians who might be concerned about someone who has access to their children.

The publicity literature in the four areas focuses on a scenario where a new boyfriend has come into the life of a single mum.

But it covers other circumstances, such as a neighbour who plays with the kids or someone offering informal sports coaching.

Once a parent has made a request, police look into the individual's background. If they find something suspicious, they may decide to tell the parent.

At the same time, the individual should expect a knock on the door from officers involved in the local protection schemes used to monitor sex offenders.

Home Officer minister Vernon Coaker, who has led the work on the pilots, says there will be a presumption of disclosure - but only if it is "necessary and proportionate" to protect children.

In other words, even if police find something serious in the background, they may not tell the parent if they conclude the individual does not pose a risk.

Confidentiality clause

What's more, parents will be told that they must not share the information they are given with anyone else - and if they do they could face civil, or in extreme circumstances, criminal action.

This confidentiality clause is designed to stop a paedophile panic spreading through a community.

Some probation officers are among those who are sceptical that this could be made to work. Harry Fletcher of the probation union Napo predicts it will be very difficult to stop one parent passing information to another.

And it's in that scenario that we could see a repeat of ugly vigilante action.

In August 2000, amid a News of the World's campaign to name and shame paedophiles, the Paulsgrove estate in Portsmouth erupted with violence as mobs targeted a man identified as a local sex offender.

The paper subsequently suspended its naming of the men amid criticism from police, child protection charities and embarrassing news coverage of the mob around the world.

But its campaign for a "Sarah's law" went on. Harry Fletcher of Napo is among those who believe that these trials are a "sop" to calls from certain tabloid newspapers.

The campaign began after the murder of Sarah Payne by Roy Whiting, a convicted sex offender who snatched the eight-year-old after she had been playing in a field with her siblings.

Sarah's mother, Sara, began lobbying for parents to be given information about the whereabouts of offenders - and she remains committed to that cause today.

Megan's law?

Sarah's law is partially modelled on the USA's Megan's law. This obliges states to publish the location of every released ex offender - California's Megan's law website allows searching by location, such as offenders living near schools or parks.

Sara Payne says she has never called for a British-style Megan's law, arguing that it would provide information whether it is wanted or not. Her preferred option would be "controlled access" with sanctions against people who abuse the information.

Ms Payne says that such a law would put power in the hands of parents, remove fear and the shadows which sex offenders use to keep their activity secret.

Ultimately, however, these four pilots are by no stretch of the imagination anywhere close to Megan's Law - and they fall well short of Sara Payne's demands.

Some critics say what we are left with is a "sop" to the tabloids - a halfway house that looks like it is doing something but may achieve very little.

But senior officers who have helped design the pilots say they should be given time to work.

Encouraging signs

The BBC understands that at least one sex offender has volunteered information to the police about a new relationship since being informed about the pilot in his area. It may be early days, but police chiefs say it is an encouraging sign of breaking down the secrecy that Sara Payne talks about.

In some respects the scheme simply formalises what already exists.

Police can and do inform communities if there is a risk, such as warning a school about an individual living nearby, or alerting a leisure centre to a suspect who may try to get a job.

The main children's charities are taking a cautious "wait and see" approach to the trials - not least because they fear paedophiles being driven further underground.

Experts also warn that some women who are targeted by offenders are the least likely to seek help from the police - either through naivety or a history of contact with the authorities.

False sense

They also point out that the pilots could create a false sense of security as they may not provide information on potential offenders with no record or known suspicious behaviour to date.

Ministers insist no decision has been taken on a national roll-out - and stress that the pilots need to be seen as part of a package which includes the sex offender register, tough sentences and the multi-agency monitoring arrangements in communities.

But for campaigner Sara Payne the bottom line is this: sex offenders thrive on secrecy - and the more frank debate there is about how to open up this world, the less risk there may be. ..News Source.. by Dominic Casciani, BBC News home affairs reporter

Read More of Article...

May 16, 2008

IL- Change in process for notification of sex offenders

This article shows the moronic costs that are attached to "Community Notification" of sex offenders when they register -or- move. Now, due to the effects of the registry, evictions and moving is a regular occurrence.

Study the system that was developed to notify community agencies who the law says need to be notified when a RSO moves into their area. Then ask, WHY? Why all the hand mailings which are now to be replaced by a e-mail system (which also requires maintenance), no wonder it costs $40-50 each time a RSO moves.

Why does't the central registry computer program simply generate, daily, a online "Movement by Zip Code" listing which community agencies could access and review daily? Allow law enforcement to do law enforcement work not administrative functions. What a waste of taxpayers money.

5-16-08 Illinois:

MT. VERNON — Due to new laws that will be in effect June 1, and in an effort to expedite notification of registered sex offenders, the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Depart-ment has announced that such notices will now be sent electronically through e-mail.

Effective June 1, all registered sex offender community notifications that the JCSO will be doing in compliance with the Sex Offender Community Notification Law, 730 ILCS 152, will be done by electronic mail, according to information from Sheriff Roger Mulch.

Notices cost the JCSO “between $40-$50,” each quarter they are mailed, Mulch explained, with about 60 to 70 agencies or organizations on the mailing list. And with electronic information the “wave” of current communication, he said information can be sent out much more quickly. “It’s more timely, efficient and easier in the long run for us to do,” he said.

Organizations in the following categories located within Jefferson County are considered a qualified recipient and organization and must contact the JCSO to be put on a listing of persons notified:

— Boards of institutions of higher education

— School boards of public school districts

— Principals of nonpublic schools

— Child care facilities sponsored by Illinois Department of Children and Family Services

— Public libraries

— Public housing agencies

— Illinois Department of Children and Family Services

— Social service agencies providing services to minors

— Volunteer organizations providing services to minors.

Organizations should send an e-mail to RSO@jeffil.us and in the subject line type “Community Notification.” In the body of the e-mail list name or the agency or organization, mailing address, telephone number, and contact person. You will receive an e-mail response as confirmation that you have been added to the electronic notification listing.

If entities do not have e-mail capability, they should contact the JCSO at 244-8004 to make arrangements to receive notifications. ..more.. by KANDACE MCCOY

Read More of Article...

August 29, 2007

Sex Offender Community Notification and Its Impact on Neighborhood Life

2003

Abstract
This paper is based on research that both quantitatively and qualitatively examines the effects of sex offender community notification on neighborhood life—specifically on fear of crime, community morale, and the ability of residents and business owners to preserve and restore their neighborhood. The literature hypothesizes that neighborhoods are stable social entities that react to destabilizing events by finding ways to resist unwanted change and bounce back to a semblance of their former selves. This resiliency factor may be problematic in those neighborhoods beset by a variety of social problems. Data for this paper were derived from an in-person interview survey with households and businesses located within an area officially notified about a convicted sex offender living there. The findings suggest that the state practice of targeting an already fragile neighborhood for sex offender placement, while a blow to the neighborhood, may not be of such magnitude as to weaken its ability to recover. ..more.. by Richard G Zevitz, Associate Professor of Criminology and Law Studies, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal (2003))

Read More of Article...