June 13, 2010

Restrictive sex offender registration rules force some underground

A careful review of this article will reveal that, no consideration was given to the allowable "grace period" to register which may account for many. If one registers at a shelter then leaves the next day, and from then on is on the streets (or registers in another shelter), the fact that he registered for one night at a shelter will distort the picture, unless grace periods are considered; here they are not.

As to where a repeat offender, commits a new sex offense, one cannot look purely at the "where" many other factors enter the picture before drawing conclusions. i.e., family, friends, and acquaintances, for one. Without a complete review, individual factors can distort the overall picture. The view taken in this article likely distorts the "travel to other places for crimes" scenario.
6-13-2010 Ohio:

About two-thirds of the registered sex offenders who claim to live at a men's homeless shelter on Cleveland's East Side, either have not spent a night there in the past three months or have never even set foot in the place.

And a Plain Dealer analysis suggests several of them might be living surreptitiously in the suburbs.

Court records and information provided by administrators at Lutheran Metropolitan Ministries, which runs the shelter at 2100 Lakeside Ave., confirm that more than 100 of the 166 sex offenders registered to that address are unaccounted for.

Increasingly stringent limitations on where sex offenders can live have driven many to register under false addresses and live off the grid -- beyond monitoring and treatment, say sex offender management and re-entry specialists.

And as the county's list of sex offenders grows to more than 3,000, with fewer resources to monitor them, it is impossible to know how many might have registered under one location and are living at another.

State law prohibits sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school or day-care facility, and many communities have passed ordinances expanding those restrictions to include parks, libraries, even churches.

But detectives argue that, although residency restrictions pose housing problems for some, in most cases, the offenders simply are attempting to keep their whereabouts unknown.

"If there were no restrictions at all on where these guys could live, they would still lie to us," Detective Sue DeChant said in a recent interview. "They say they're not working, and they have a job. They say they don't have a vehicle, and they own 25 of them. They just don't want anyone to know who they are."

Sex offenders must register their address and other information with the sheriff's office every 90 days for a period of at least 10 years. The information, along with photos of the offenders, is posted on the state attorney general's website and is intended to alert residents of the presence of sex offenders in their neighborhoods.

After an offender is convicted, he or she has three days to register, a process that takes about an hour initially.

Playing a game of cat-and-mouse

DeChant said in many cases, it is obvious the offenders are not homeless when they try to register as a resident at the men's shelter. They often show up wearing nice clothes, jewelry or expensive-looking sunglasses and accessories, she said. Photos of the offenders on the registry website corroborate the detective's observations.

But offenders are required only to sign a document pledging that the information they provide is accurate, and they do not have to prove residency.

Within a week, a deputy sheriff will visit the shelter, call or send a list of names to cross-reference with the shelter's electronic check-in system that keeps track of attendance at the facility. But by then, the offender is off the radar.

Sheriff's detectives, who called the process a cat-and-mouse game, say that in any given week, at least one or two offenders are found to have fraudulently registered to the shelter.

After The Plain Dealer asked the Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Office for a list of the shelter's sex offenders whose whereabouts are unknown, detectives said they discovered two dozen new cases of registration violations that will be passed on to a grand jury for indictment in the coming weeks.

"A guy who is trying to assimilate and make good in his community is going to make good," said Detective Katie Orlando. "But these guys are using a very positive program in their own deceitful and deceptive way. And we want to do all we can to stop them from doing it."

But the detectives acknowledge that preventing registration fraud and maintaining the integrity of the registry is a daunting task for the department with only two deputies managing a growing sex offender caseload. ..Click for the remainder of article.. Leila Atassi, The Plain Dealer

2 comments:

Angee said...

I put this at the source.

Posted by angelmcdade
June 13, 2010, 3:26PM

It appears that Cuyahoga County and Lakewood have created the problem. You don't banish people and then expect them to tell you where they live, where they work and what they own. Your residency restrictions are contradictory to the statements that most repeat offenses take place away from the registered address.
Deceit has been forced yet crimes, repeat and otherwise, are still on the decline. If they have found a way into your neighborhoods they are creating no problems.This entire charade could stop with doing away with restrictive zones AND taking away the public registry that irresponsible residents fail to use as intended. Nobody likes sex offenders Deceit by sex offenders is so small-minded and political and created by people that don;t do a damned thing about prevention. Dumping registrants on your neighbors is a act of selfishness. No registered sex offenders showing up in your neighborhood doesn't mean they aren't there. It just means they are trying to avoid a witch hunt and being forced out again. As an advocate for victims I hope the day comes when people stop making laws to worsen the situation. Stepping on other people doesn't inspire them to change their ways. And how many registrants have been convicted of new crimes? Two? One? None? Were they people who had been forced from their homes? Then those who forced them out also share blame.

Failure by a registrant is what we strive for and that means a new crime. Shame on righteous adults that knowingly put our children at risk. These people are scarier than the sex offenders themselves.

Anonymous said...

I saw this stupid detective's comment on another blog:

"Detective Sue DeChant said in a recent interview. "...They say they don't have a vehicle, and they own 25 of them. They just don't want anyone to know who they are."

How ignorant are you detective? Who is it that lies? 25 cars?? Come on idiot, we can't afford 25 cars. Wouldn't you say you are adding a little to the story. And, if you are, then you must be making up more as well. Can we even take what you say as truth?

I bet not!!!!!!!!