5-23-2010 National:
Note: In reference to my earlier e-mail, some folks are still having problems with the 2,000 character limit on the Regulations.gov website, so below (between the red bars) is a ULTRA-STRIPPED DOWN version of what needs to be sent to Regulations.gov. Apparently some browsers were interpreting the codes used to color portions (which I did to help folks understand important points), but that caused over 2,000 characters Regulations.gov limit. Folks, we are going to get through this yet. Sorry for the inconvenience. eAdvocate
On 5-20-2010 I explained to folks what had happened on the Regulations.gov website which prevents EVERYONE from posting "comments" to the NEW Supplemental Guidelines (SG)(actually they are NEW Proposed Rules).
So far, to my knowledge, all efforts to get Regulations.gov to post the SG correctly (to allow electronic comments), seems to have failed, but MANY have tried.
So, I am proposing a "National Effort" to do this, between the WIDE LINES below (RED on Internet Explorer) is a sample e-mail to the Regulations.gov website which explains (to them) everything that has transpired (on their website) and why it is incorrect, then asks them to fix the problem to allow electronic comments to OAG Docket No. 134, on their website.
Also, I suggest that folks e-mail a DUPLICATE to the SMART Office ( GETSMART@usdoj.gov ), this way both sides of the problem have been notified, on the outside chance there is some tricky interpretation of what is written in the Federal Register. In addition, (OPTIONAL) it would not hurt to involve your personal representatives in Washington DC (Send them a copy too). You are their constituent and ask them to look into the matter ASAP.
WHAT TO DO:
1) On the Regulations.gov website is a TAB for "Contact Us" (click my link to get there) and a form will be displayed. Enter the *Required information (Note: Either your e-mail address -OR- your phone no. is required) and copy EXACTLY what is below between the red bars into the box below the "Technical Question (already checked)" area, (I have checked to make sure comment below is within the 2000 character limit) and simply SUBMIT that to them; its that easy.
2) Then, in a regular e-mail (Subject Line: OAG Docket No. 134), copy the same information below (between the red bars), and send it to the SMART Office as well as your personal representatives in Washington DC. Remember, your are their constituents and they should help you with Federal Government problems, this is one, major one.
In case folks have forgotten why this is so important to registrants nationally, please read my earlier commentary: " Action Alert: RE: Supplemental Guidelines - Section II (A International Travel)" which also deals with everyday lives of registrants locally (Domestic as they call it). Finally, I have also been advised that there is a misconception as to the retroactivity within the Supplement Guidelines and I will soon do another detailed commentary.
Now there are LESS THAN 60 days for electronic comments because of this snafu. Speed is of the essence, remember, the mechanism for electronic comments (Regulations.gov) must work or folks are stuck with snail-mail. That simply will not do in the electronic age we now live in, esp. if folks want to send multiple comments.
Thanks,
eAdvocate
RE: OAG Docket No. 134
To Regulations.gov website -and/or- the SMART Office:
On 5-14-2010 the Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General (Agency) posted NEW Supplemental Guidelines for Sex Offender Registration and Notification for public comment. Link to Federal Register: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-11665.pdf Within that document, it states:
DATES: Written comments must be postmarked and electronic comments must be submitted on or before July 13, 2010. ....
ADDRESSES: ... To ensure proper handling, please reference OAG Docket No. 134 on your correspondence. You may submit comments electronically or view an electronic version of these proposed guidelines at http://www.regulations.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
Please note that all comments received are considered part of the public record and made available for public inspection online at http://www.regulations.gov.
On Regulations.gov the Federal Register document is posted as "Notice" and Agency "OJP," and DOES NOT permit the public to enter electronic comments. Link to document on Regulations.gov:
http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#docketDetail?R=OJP-2010-0001
Opening the above link four(4) boxes are checked under "Document Type": "Proposed Rule" "Rule" "Notice" "Other"
Given "Proposed Rule" is checked and it is not 7-13-2010, public must be allowed to submit electronic comments. The problem, Regulations.gov opening page, where it explains and allows one to submit comments, DOES NOT work for this document. Hence, no one can submit electronic comments to this document!
The Federal Register clearly says electronic comments may be submitted, and points the public to the Regulations.gov. Further, it also says "comments are available for public inspection on the Regulations.gov."
The Federal Register allows 60 days for electronic comments, approx. 10 days have already gone by due to this snafu, how can this be fixed?
Thank you.
/Your Name/
...................
No comments:
Post a Comment