April 1, 2011

Reading cut off after lawmakers offended by sex offender bill

If lawmakers, do not read or hear read, bills, how are they going to know whether or not to vote for the bill? Is this the first proof that lawmakers RUBBER STAMP sex offender bills without knowing what they say? Who is writing these bills if not lawmakers?
4-1-2011 Idaho:

Rep. JoAn Wood, R-Rigby, objected to the full reading of the sex offender registration bill, saying its language was offensive - it included wording about crimes of a sexual nature. “Having the clerk have to get up and read that, that's ridiculous,” Wood said. “I think it's cruel to her to make her read that, and it's certainly not something we want to go out on TV.” Wood added, “It's bad enough we have to deal with it in committee. Everybody doesn't have to have their nose rubbed in it.”

The reading continued, but then Rep. Stephen Hartgen, R-Twin Falls, rose and said he thought the full reading of this particular bill was “inappropriate,” and asked unanimous consent to waive further reading of the bill. This time, Democrats didn't object. The bill was then presented by its sponsor, Rep. Julie Ellsworth, R-Boise, and quickly passed on a unanimous vote. ..Source.. by Betsy

1 comment:

Just another SO said...

they think the wording of the bill is "offensive"? Well, I think the content of the bill is offensive. Yet, like so many others, I have to live with that content every day of my life.

If the elected officials are so offended by the wording of the bill, then it shouldn't have been passed. This article, in and of itself, should be grounds for a court challenge as to the constitutionallity of this bill.