'"Toy Story 3" will be just fine without him.' says the article, maybe so, but, what about his family knowing he has been convicted of a crime for simply doing what is right for his family? Folks, sometimes the law, is an ass!7-12-2010 Michigan:
HOWELL, Mich. (CBS/AP) "Toy Story 3" had a very unhappy ending for a man from Michigan, who took his family to see the popular G-rated movie at a Livingston County theater.
You see, Michael Keeler, who's 46, isn't supposed to go to a children's movie; in fact, Keeler isn't supposed to go anywhere within 1,000 feet of anyplace "primarily used by people age 17 or under."
That's because those are the terms of Keeler's probation -- as a convicted sex offender. He was sentenced in May 2008 to serve five years' probation after being found guilty of second-degree criminal sexual conduct involving a person under 13.
It was the electronic tether that Keeler wears that alerted authorities he was at the theater for "Toy Story 3."
For him, the end of the story was getting arrested, pleading guilty to violating his probation, and being ordered to serve 90 days' house arrest.
Of Keeler's decision to take his family to the kid flick, his attorney said Keeler "was trying to be a good father and he lost sight of his responsibility to the community."
"Toy Story 3" will be just fine without him. ..Source.. Barry Leibowitz
2 comments:
Mr Keller has NO responsibility to the community. Being a father COMES FIRST.
Please, Please, everyone.....Start fighting back. This is the result of POLITICIAN'S DESIRES FOR VOTES.
This has nothing to do with being dangerous to our neighbors. We have studies and statistics BY OUR OWN GOVERNMENT that proves what we say. The politician's have NOTHING except their lies.
Please start commenting and writing and speaking up for yourselves.
Hold your head up. Don't let the public label you. You are just as good (and sometimes even better) than your neighbors in your community!!
I appreciate the sentiments of Voice and Anonymous, but must disagree in this circumstance. This man is still on probation, and has direct instructions not to do those things FROM HIS PO. No matter how stupid they may seem, a probationer MUST follow the PO's rules. Any offender, with any crime against a child, could be under a similar restriction if the PO feels it is what is needed.
Being a father IS first! That is why this man was permitted to be on probation, rather than jail. But he will have to spend his time with his children somewhere other than a movie theatre, playground, or park. Once he is "off paper," if he still has those restrictions, THEN he can fight back -- against the label, the restrictions, and the registry.
Post a Comment