4-22-2010 Indiana:
From the Volokh Conspiracy
The case is Barnes v. State (Ind. Ct. App. Apr. 15, 2010); I’m not an expert on the field, so I don’t know how representative this is of the law throughout the country, but it struck me as interesting. The court’s conclusion:
We reverse Barnes’s disorderly conduct conviction because the State failed to prove that Barnes’s noisy political expression was an abuse of his right to free speech. We also reverse Barnes’s convictions for battery on a law enforcement officer and resisting law enforcement, but we remand for a new trial on those convictions because the jury was not properly instructed on Barnes‟s defense of the right to reasonably resist unlawful entry into his home.
1 comment:
Does this actually say that this case is going back to court to retry this man for a right that he ALREADY HAS stated "Clearly" in the Constitution.
Far be it from me to keep a state from WASTING money in re-trying a case that they will loose hands down.
Post a Comment