3-18-2010 California:
SAN DIEGO — In California, the criminal justice system's method of dealing with sexual predators who harm or even kill children is — to borrow a phrase — stuck on stupid.
What else can we conclude in light of recent and frightening revelations about just how free and uninhibited John Albert Gardner III, a convicted sex offender now accused of murder, was while on parole after serving five years of a six-year prison term for molesting, beating and falsely imprisoning a 13-year-old girl. The victim later said in an interview that she thought Gardner intended to rape her.
The Associated Press has reported that Gardner violated his parole seven times by moving too close to a school, for letting the battery run low on his electronic ankle bracelet, and other offenses. According to media reports, Gardner also had other brushes with the law. He was stopped and cited by local law enforcement officers numerous times during his parole for possessing marijuana and other infractions. And yet, his parole was never revoked.
The people of California would like to know why. Was it because of neglect, incompetence or the fact that the prisons are so seriously overcrowded that field agents are discouraged from sending offenders back inside? They may never find out since officials with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation claim that Gardner's field file — which contained, among other things, notes and observations of parole officers — was destroyed under a department policy that requires documents be purged within one year after a person's release from parole.
That's convenient. Are you sure the acronym for this agency isn't CYA? Could this be part of a cover-up by squeamish, six-figure-salaried bureaucrats in response to a high-profile case that could cost them their jobs? That is not out of the question. The more that comes out about what Gardner may have been up to while on parole — including the multiple violations — the worse the story gets.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger recently ordered the California Department of Corrections to stop destroying the field files. Now Attorney General Jerry Brown, who is running for Schwarzenegger's job, must investigate the Corrections Department to make sure everything was done properly.
Meanwhile, we're not doing a very good job of protecting our children from the inefficiencies of the system. Gardner is now accused in the murder of 17-year-old Chelsea King of Poway. He is also "a focus of the investigation" into the death of 14-year-old Amber Dubois of Escondido.
The 3.2 million people of San Diego County — and the millions more around the country following this story — should start channeling some of the anger and disgust they feel toward sexual predators such as Gardner and focus it on the system that lets them loose in society largely unsupervised. These are your tax dollars at work, folks.
But let's also save some of that anger and disgust for local law enforcement officials and the dysfunctional way in which they deal with sex offenders.
Aim it at police who, with scant evidence, foolishly make snap judgments that missing teenage girls are more likely runaways and not abductees. This was how the Escondido Police Department dealt with Amber Dubois' disappearance last year.
Aim it also at prosecutors who are so eager to put a conviction in the "win" column that they offer ridiculously lenient plea deals instead of going to trial and risk blemishing their record with a defeat.
The accused are entitled to their day in court to answer the charges against them. But this system can't be defended. ..Opinion.. of Ruben Navarrette Jr.
March 19, 2010
Opinion: California's method of dealing with sexual predators is broken
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
While your investigating, remember that Gardner was known to be violent according the a California psychologist. The word was already out that he "WOULD BE A DANGER" to the community if let out.
Who's to blame here......CALIFORNIA!
Blame California Corrections for NOT assesing a known problem.
Not all sex offenders are not like Gardner. But, people like Gardner are hiding inside each states registry. This a a "very real" danger. Not even the police know who the dangerous ones are because the have to keep and eye on so many.
California's HUMONGOUS mistake proves what has been said all along......Not every sex offender is dangerous like the myth that has been spread by the media and politician's.
Start hearing the truth about sex offenders now and you might be able to avoid another Gardner indecent in the future!
Very few sex offenders are like Gardner. Most need to get on with their lives so law enforcement can keep close tabs on the other Gardner's in each states registry.
To Anonymous: I'm afraid I disagree with you, here is why:
Gardner was not any more dangerous than anyone else on the registry and did not raise the eye of police. He was not hiding in the registry, he was just registered.
Only by second guessing folks in the criminal justice system (parole board, prosecutor, etc) can we today say he was a dangerous person back then.
The collective evidence we know today was just occurring over time back then.
Registries are not meant to identify dangerous persons, registries are not more than a list of folks showing where they will be a few hours of the day/night sleeping.
Even the classification systems we know today will not identify dangerous persons, AWA's system is an absolute joke.
Nothing lawmakers do will prevent another Gardner or another Ted Bundy, that is a fact of life.
However, if lawmakers would actually use PREVENTION as their focus, and enact laws tied to that, then we can reduce the likelihood of another Gardner.
Your statement ... "if lawmakers would actually use PREVENTION as their focus, and enact laws tied to that, then we can reduce the likelihood of another Gardner"...is true and correct.
As a matter of point, I agree with everything you said in the above post.
However, there needs to be a point where "the professional clinician's opinion" must be taken seriously. If Gardner was that dangerous, then he should have been detained for further observation. This MIGHT have prevented a crime.
But, as you say, Ted Bundy's, Couey's, and Gardner's will show up in every criminal aspect from time to time. It's not just indigenous to sex offenses. It part of life as a whole.
Post a Comment