2-8-2010 Maryland:
After the recent kidnapping and murder of 11-year-old Sarah Foxwell in Salisbury, Md., an alleged sex offender by the name of Thomas J. Leggs Jr. was charged with kidnapping and burglary. Little Sarah's body was found badly burned on Christmas Day 2009.
Do sex offender registries really work? Consider the following:
Leggs already was listed on both the Delaware and Maryland sex offender registries.
Leggs was one of 172 sex offenders in Wicomico County. The sheriff's department had conducted at least seven routine checks on this individual. Each time, he was in compliance with the law.
His criminal history, however, suggests some serious problems.
In 1997, he was convicted of a third-degree sex offense involving a 12-year-old girl and sentenced to five years, with all but six months suspended.
In 2001, Delaware registered him as a "high risk" sex offender after he was charged with raping a 16-year-old girl on Rehoboth Beach. He served minimal prison time.
Most recently, in October 2009, he was charged with breaking into a home where a 21-year old female alleged she observed him standing next to her bed at 4:10 a.m. with his shirt off and his pants down to his knees.
Did the sex offender registry program in Delaware and Maryland work?
Only after the crime was committed did the registry possibly assist law enforcement personnel in the apprehension of a suspect. It did not prevent the crime.
If sex offender registries make you feel safer in regard to the well-being of your children, consider another tragedy in California.
In 1991, Phillip Garrido was listed on California's sex offender registry and restricted from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park. Maryland does not have this requirement.
Garrido also previously had been convicted of kidnapping and rape and had been sentenced to 50 years for this crime in 1976, but released early.
Even in consideration of the above, he still allegedly managed to kidnap 11-year-old Jaycee Dugard off her bicycle on a California street, in broad daylight, and keep her locked in a shed behind his house for some 18 years while repeatedly raping her and fathering two children with her.
The California sex offender registry did not prevent this crime nor did it quickly help in the apprehension of the sex offender.
If you believe a sex offender registry makes your children safer, you should think again.
Some other information you might find even more alarming: • There are more than 5,250 registered sex offenders in Maryland.
• 1,032 of these offenders are incarcerated.
• 158 of these offenders are missing from where they should be living.
• 4,117 of these offenders acted against children.
If sex offender registries seem to be the wave of the future, should we also demand other registries for murderers, arsonists, thieves, etc.?
Certainly, as we get tougher with laws, I don't believe any employer will go out of their way to hire one of these offenders, do you?
If the offender then has difficulty getting a job in society, what might he or she do with a little extra recreational time on their hands?
Perhaps educating the public, both adults and children, to the potential dangers and behaviors of sex offenders might be more helpful.
If convicted as a sex offender involving children, perhaps the law should read the offender is not permitted to visit or live in a house where there are kids. Any violations of this release condition automatically will return the offender to prison.
I am afraid that tougher laws might sound really good and help get people really excited and elected, but the practicality and enforcement of them in preventing crimes in the neighborhood is slim to none.
Also, when the released prisoner has difficulty finding employment and adjusting to society because of a name on a registry, one should not be too surprised if that person returns to crime, sorrow visits a different community and another murder finds its way to the headlines of a local newspaper. ..Source.. Lloyd "Pete" Waters is a Sharpsburg resident who writes for The Herald-Mail
February 8, 2010
Do harsher sex offender laws really work?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Author makes a very good point in his last two paragraphs.
Point One, regardless of how "strong" they make the laws, enforcment of them is nearly impossible without violating the Civil Rights of the S.O. And while I know that some people wouldn't care if our civil rights were violated, as a registered S.O., I do care.
Point Two. Having my name listed on two registerys is making it nearly impossible for me to find gainful employment. It would be hard enough in this econcomy to find work as an ex-felon. However, also being listed as a Sex Offender has made it all but impossible.
My opinion is that the Sex Offender Registry is a practice that unfairly targets a specific group, causing illegal discrimination and persecution of people who have paid their "debt to society". We deserve the same chance as everyone else to start over. Publicizing our names and faces everywhere we go makes that impossible.
So my question is this. Because it creats a minority group that is heavily discriminated against by all sectors of our society, is the Sex Offender Registration Act even legal. Seems to me it is in violation of at least three Anti-discrimination laws.
SWC - Montana
Post a Comment