Excessive personal information! Why? The purpose of the registry -in essence- was/is to notify the public of where the registrant lives, works or goes to school.2-1-2010 Maryland:
KEY is: "Notify the Public" of whereabouts information.
It appears that lawmakers are now using (mis-using) the registry as a vehicle to gather other personal registrant information, on the premise that, such would be needed if the offender committed another crime. i.e., law enforcement could more quickly solve crimes.
Lawmakers are subverting the original registry intent -whereabouts information- for the public. Registrants need to BEGIN reviewing all such information requested by lawmakers, and start a quest to stop lawmakers from obtaining such information, other than whereabouts information.
Registrants may have other rights under those laws. i.e., professional license may say such is private information. Registrants may then be able to thwart providing that information. This theory may apply to other information too. i.e. palm prints and beyond. Each item-requested needs to be further analyzed, and objected to accordingly following research of laws behind the information. The public has no right to have professional licenses or palm prints, in no way does that provide the public whereabouts of the registrant.
Bills in ALL states need to be analyzed this way, and objected to specifically under the necessary and proper information for the public to know (intent of registry). Remember the registry IS NOT a vehicle to build a dossier on registrants!
Finally, I sincerely hope they do catch whoever killed that little girl and prosecute them to the full extent of the law. However, with that said, such crimes should not be used as a vehicle to expand laws (excessive information) or subvert the intent of public registry laws.
Legislation against sex offenders is gaining momentum in the Maryland General Assembly, as lawmakers consider lengthening sex offenders' prison terms, monitoring them with GPS devices and sharing their registry information with other states.
Following the murder of 11-year-old Sarah Foster, who was abducted by a registered sex offender on the Eastern Shore and found dead on Christmas Day, Maryland lawmakers have been trying to figure out how to tighten up their laws.
Sen. James DeGrange, D-Anne Arundel County, says the loophole may be in the state's Sex Offender Registry database.
Under a bill he is sponsoring, sex offenders would have to provide more information -- such as palm prints and professional license information -- to the registry. And offenders would have to update their status with the registry every three months -- instead of every six -- to bring Maryland in line with federal standards.
"Without making these changes, Maryland could lose $2 million in federal funding, so it's something that we have to do," DeGrange said. "It's something that's needed to know who these people are and to prevent a tragedy that was recently experienced on the Eastern Shore."
DeGrange's bill was included in a list of 10 legislative priorities Democratic lawmakers announced for the 2010 session. His measure also would increase information sharing between Maryland and neighboring states, so offenders moving among states would be more easily identifiable.
Expanding the state's Sex Offender Registry is one of several priorities Gov. Martin O'Malley outlined to the General Assembly.
"There should be absolutely no mercy shown to anyone who harms a child in our state, and our legislation serves to impose the strictest standards of supervision to ensure that Maryland's children are protected," O'Malley said, describing his agenda for toughening up on sex offenders.
O'Malley also said he supports lifetime supervision -- possibly using GPS devices -- for repeat offenders, criminal background checks for all employees at child care facilities, and reinstitution of the state's failed Sexual Offender Advisory Board, which hasn't convened in the four years since its creation. The board is expected to meet for the first time this week.
Other proposals before the General Assembly would increase minimum sentences for second-degree rape and sex offense against a child from five to 20 years, prohibit offenders from earning "good time" credits in prison, and require repeat offenders to be placed in state mental institutions following a prison term. ..Source.. Hayley Peterson
Examiner Staff
No comments:
Post a Comment