December 20, 2009

Sex offenders file suit over technology law

12-20-2009 Nebraska:

The new measure aims to stop use of Internet to find victims

The new measure aims to stop use of Internet to find victims.

A new Nebraska law that seeks to curtail sex offenders' use of the Internet, including social networking sites such as Facebook, is being challenged in federal court.

A group of sex offenders allege the law violates their constitutional rights on several fronts, including the right to free speech.

They say it will make it difficult to keep a job because of the restrictions and oversight imposed on their computer use.

The suit was filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court by Omaha lawyer Stu Dornan, a former Douglas County attorney.

Dornan is representing 20 convicted sex offenders, along with 11 others who are either related to a sex offender or who employ a sex offender. All have asked the court to remain anonymous because they fear public retribution, Dornan said.

They have asked a judge to stop the new law from going into effect Jan. 1, pending the outcome of a jury trial. The law was passed in the last legislative session and signed by Gov. Dave Heineman.

The lawsuit names all of the state's county attorneys and sheriffs, the Nebraska State Patrol and Attorney General Jon Bruning.

Bruning and Douglas County Attorney Don Kleine said they were confident the law will withstand a legal challenge, saying similar laws have already been reviewed by other federal courts.

"This is a group of people who are obviously very unhappy they are caught, and they're going to challenge everything," Bruning said.

Kleine defended the law as another tool to protect society against sexual predators.

"These laws have a very important purpose -- to empower the public to protect their neighbor, their children and their schools," he said.

The law was presented in the Legislature as a way to stop convicted sex offenders from using technology -- including text messages sent from cell phones -- to prowl for victims.

Dornan argued, however, that it goes too far.

A Republican, Dornan was appointed Douglas County attorney in 2003, but lost his effort to win election in 2006 to Kleine, a Democrat.

Dornan also says that a requirement that the names of all sex offenders be published on the state's sex offender registry site unfairly lumps all offenders together, regardless of whether they pose a continued threat to society.

Currently, the state uses a system to place a sex offender into one of three categories, depending on the risk he or she poses to reoffend: low, moderate or high risk.

Only high-risk offenders are publicly identified on the state's sex offender registry.

Under the new law, everyone will be identified, including, for example, a 19-year-old who has been convicted of statutory rape for engaging in consensual sex with a 15-year-old.

It lumps everybody together. You don't have the right anymore to present evidence as to whether you've rehabilitated yourself, or you are a low risk to reoffend," Dornan said.

Bruning said the decision to require all people convicted of sexual crimes to be placed on the registry was made to simplify the process.

It was also done, he said, to reduce the number of legal challenges filed by offenders who were upset with their risk assessment level.

"We thought it was a fair way to have the risk determined based on the crime, rather than on a psychological review that has been challenged by these very same people," Bruning said.

The new law also requires sex offenders to sign a consent form that allows law enforcement officers to search any computer or other electronic device that they may use. It also allows law enforcement to place software on sex offenders' computers to monitor their Internet use.

Dornan said the law would unfairly allow police to search a sex offender's computer at work or a computer used by other family members at home.

"The question becomes, with this sort of broad law enforcement discretion, who is going to employ them?" Dornan said.

Kleine said that a person's computer at work is already monitored by the person's employer.

"This may create a hardship for some offenders, but that's not our concern. Our concern is to empower the public with information," he said.

The law also prohibits sex offenders from logging onto any social networking sites where minors are allowed, such as My Space or Facebook. Dornan argued that violates a person's right to free speech.

"If the Constitution doesn't protect all of us, it protects none of us," he said.
..Source.. Robynn Tysver, WHNS

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

these laws are only politically motivated. Honestly, there is less than 1% of offenders that use social networks to find victims. These laws do in fact violate the simple yet whole constitutional rights of both men and women alike convicted or not. There purpose are ballooned filled with air but no statistics that support it. Here in NY Cuomo came out with E-STOP boasting to have removed some 33000 offenders from facebook and myspace but does not place one of them to have committed a crime on those networks. I admit there are some out there that do, but you cannot place a whole class of offenders in one catagory. if that is the case why not do same to murders that are release or robbers too not to mention drug convicts. The basic rights freedom of speech, expression, assembly, unreasonable search and seizure not to mention due process of the law have not changed. However, here they are not resepected. Statistics will show that 99% of the ex offender are not repeat offenders but are whole new cases. 85% of exoffenders do not repeat which has been proven to be true. These law are in relations to NJ Megans law and have went over the clift. Its like a free fall to make laws without consideration of the facts and civil rights being violated. The law should be overturned even the one in NY as they are not going to serve there intended purpose but open doors elsewhere. think these laws do not apply to foreign countries.