12-25-2009 National:
Faced with soaring prison costs, states are finally focusing on policies that would help former prisoners stay out of jail after they are released. Some legislatures are reshaping laws that land parolees back inside for technical violations that should be dealt with on the outside. More than a dozen cities and counties have taken steps that make it easier for qualified ex-offenders to land government jobs, except in education and law enforcement and other sensitive areas from which people with convictions are normally barred by law.
Still, the nation as a whole needs to do much more about laws that marginalize former offenders — and often drive them back to jail — by denying them voting rights, parental rights, drivers licenses and access to public housing, welfare and food stamps, even in cases where they have led blameless lives after prison.
New Jersey — a state with a terrible record of marginalizing former prisoners — could lead the way. Before the State Legislature in Trenton is a comprehensive package of reforms that would help ex-offenders rejoin society’s mainstream and lower the chances, and costs, of recidivism.
New Jersey lawmakers heard some depressing testimony in hearings leading up to the legislation. Deterred by barriers to jobs, housing and education, about two-thirds of the people released from prison in New Jersey end up back inside within three years. Since taxpayers spend about $48,000 per prison inmate per year, by some estimates, the state could reap significant savings from even a small decline in the return-to-prison rate.
The proposed reforms in New Jersey seek to end practices under which former prisoners are denied employment because of minor convictions, even in the distant past, and crimes that have nothing at all to do with the work being sought.
No reasonable person would suggest that a sex offender be given a job in an elementary school or day-care center. An ex-offender could not be disqualified for employment unless the offense was directly related to the job. Job seekers would no longer be required to disclose convictions on applications for state, county or municipal jobs. The offenses could still be uncovered in background checks, but they would no longer automatically rule out an applicant from the start.
The bill would lift the state ban on food stamps and welfare benefits for people with felony drug convictions and would expand education and training opportunities for inmates. And it would end an odious practice under which the prison system earns a profit by overcharging poor families for the collect calls they receive from relatives inside a system. The added cost sometimes forces families to choose between putting food on the table or letting a child speak to an incarcerated parent.
The New Jersey Legislature has a chance to provide a new lease on life to thousands of families while offering a model for the rest of the nation. ..Source.. NY Times
December 25, 2009
NY Times Editorial: Smart Answers to Recidivism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It makes no sense to further punish an offender after he's paid his debt to society. This article makes perfect sense. People trying to get their lives back on target do not need to face further discrimination in employment, housing, voting, parenting or other barriers to a return to normalcy.
The vengeance-influenced laws, such as residency restrictions in Miami-Dade that force dozens of registered sex offenders to live under a bridge only create the kinds of conditions to force them to return to crime.
Why does this country have the highest rate of prison inmates/parolees in the world? Let's get past emotional reactions to social problems and use what research and common sense tells us? Let's get these folks back into society instead of putting more barriers to their rehabilitation.
Post a Comment