August 18, 2009

NC- Sex offender can't worship

8-19-2009 North Carolina:

James Nichols said he was flabbergasted when a Chatham County sheriff's deputy arrested him in March for a simple weekly activity -- going to church.

Nichols, 31, had served six years in prison for indecent liberties with a teenage girl and attempted second-degree rape. He was released last September and started attending Moncure Baptist Church. He met with the pastor, disclosed his crimes and often sat in the front row for worship.

But after the Chatham Sheriff's Office investigated an alleged sexual assault by another person in the church parking lot in March, Nichols was arrested because he was attending the church, which has a child-care facility on its premises.

"Anyone in this world has a right to practice their religion, and whether they've made any mistake in their life, they should have the right," Nichols said.

But a state law that took effect in December forbids registered sex offenders from being within 300 feet of a school, playground, day care or children's museum.

"The law we passed doesn't let them go to church, because there are nurseries in churches," said state Rep. Verla Insko, D-Chapel Hill, the only legislator in the House and Senate to oppose the law.

And we elect these people, only this one understands! Lord help us...... Someone please, find an idiot proof test to administer to folks before electing them.

Nichols, with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union, is challenging the law in Chatham County. A coalition of social workers and psychologists who treat sex abusers have been fighting it in the General Assembly. Some think churches should play a key role in rehabilitating offenders.

Proponents, though, want to keep sexual offenders away from children at all costs, even after they've finished their prison time.

'Lost their rights'

"As far as I'm concerned, they've lost all their rights -- to go to church ... to go to McDonald's to get a cheeseburger if they've got the slides," said state Sen. David Hoyle, the Gastonia Democrat who sponsored the law. "They have made that choice. They have imposed that on themselves. I didn't."

Nichols' lawyer, Glenn Gerding, calls the law unconstitutional because it infringes on his client's freedom to exercise religion. He said the law applies even if an offender is merely sitting on a pew and no children are in the building.

Katy Parker, North Carolina legal counsel for the ACLU, said her agency has taken about 50 phone calls from pastors and registered sex offenders since the law took effect. She said law enforcement officials have told pastors they can't allow sex offenders to attend church. She also has heard of offenders being arrested for exercising at a YMCA.

Nichols appears to be one of the few offenders arrested for being on church grounds, though there clearly are other offenders attending worship. Eric Sipe, a sex-abuse therapist in Catawba County, said sheriff's departments vary in how they enforce the law.

Nichols recently moved to Sanford, where he started attending Try Jesus Ministries. The church has children's programs, but Nichols said law officers are more understanding. Last weekend, he went with fellow church members on a retreat to Tennessee.

"I go to church anytime I get a chance," said Nichols. "I believe in it. It helps me keep my mind on track. It helps me be a better person not just to myself but to someone else."

Hoyle, the law sponsor, said he doesn't have a problem if pedophiles go to church, as long as there aren't children there.

"It's a recipe for them to find victims," he said. "Find another church that they don't have a nursery. I'm sure there are a lot of churches that don't have nurseries."

Gerding, Nichols' lawyer, argues that churches are precisely where offenders need to be. "Churches are often the last hope for many sex offenders who need the stability and guidance a church pastor and church family can provide," Gerding wrote in his motion. ..Source.. by JESSE JAMES DECONTO - Staff Writer

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Why is it assumed that ALL Registrants are "Pedophiles"? And why is it also assumed that any person who has assaulted a child/minor sexually is therefor a "Pedophile"? Is not the definition of pedophilia a condition in which someone is fixated or attracted to sex specifiably with children? Is it not possible that a person could utilize sex itself as a coping mechanism (no matter the age of the victim) of whom one or more have happened to be underage???? Could it be that some are simply addicted to SEX rather than necessarily a child or children???