So often we see politicians claim there is a problem, and suggest a solution that just doesn't make sense.
The Problem: Roughly 10% of ALL registered sex offenders (RSOs) did not live at the address they registered at.
The Solution: When sex offenders leave prison make ALL of them wear a GPS unit.
There is no logical connection between the problem and the solution. Most RSOs got out of prison 5-10-20-30 years ago and some percentage of them are not keeping their addresses current. So how does making NEW sex offenders released from prison solve the problem of past sex offenders not keeping their addresses current?
What he suggests is, to punish newly released sex offenders for things former sex offenders are doing. A "class punishment," and , an enhanced punishment for those who failed to keep addresses current, when they are caught.
Is logic lost when folks become public servants? I wonder, are the police verifying addresses, and if not, does that need to be addressed? Just a logical thought which seems to have escaped political thinking.
7-22-2008 Pennsylvania:
Sex offenders who are released from prison should be monitored more widely by global positioning satellite technology so that law enforcement officers do not lose track of them as often, Pennsylvania's auditor general said Tuesday.
Auditor General Jack Wagner urged state lawmakers to require at least five years of GPS monitoring for sex offenders who do not comply with Megan's Law, which requires them to register their address with state police upon their release from prison.
The law should also be revised to mandate similar tracking of sexually violent predators whose victims are children immediately after they are released, Wagner said.
The recommendations were included in a report Wagner released at a Capitol news conference. Auditors determined in early June that the state lost track of more than 900 sex offenders, or about 10 percent of all registered sex offenders, based on apparently outdated addresses in Pennsylvania's Megan's Law registry.
"This is very disturbing to me ... and should be to every Pennsylvanian, and quite frankly, is unacceptable," Wagner said.
GPS systems allow tracking of offenders using a monitor attached to an ankle bracelet and a small tracking device that offenders must carry with them whenever they leave the house. The device transmits information that allows authorities to view an offender's location on a computerized map.
Wagner, who is seeking re-election this year to a second four-year term, previously criticized the state's Megan's Law enforcement in a 2006 audit that found state police had not verified the whereabouts of 700 sex offenders.
-There it is, reelection, and he needs the Sex Offender Stigma to carry him through reelection, it has nothing to do with safety which he uses as a pretext...
State law currently allows, but does not mandate, the use of sex offender GPS monitoring by county probation authorities and the state Board of Probation and Parole.
Republican Sens. Jane Orie of Allegheny County and John Rafferty of Chester County said they are planning introduce legislation that would require wider use of GPS tracking. They said they hope a bill will be considered when the Legislature returns to Harrisburg in the fall.
At least 24 other states have laws requiring GPS monitoring of certain sex offenders, and 14 of Pennsylvania's 67 counties are using GPS tracking for that purpose, Wagner said.
Gov. Ed Rendell's administration had no immediate comment on Wagner's recommendations. Spokesmen for Rendell and the state police said their offices needed to evaluate them.
The probation and parole board is preparing to embark in the coming weeks on a pilot program to test the equipment of eight GPS vendors, spokeswoman Sherry Tate said. She did not know where the testing would be performed or how many sex offenders would be involved.
A previous test program that ran between October 2005 and June 2006 was riddled with problems, such as lost or blocked signals, she said.
"We found the technology was not sufficient at the time," Tate said.
-And nothing has changed since, all the old problems continue to plague GPS units.
Counties that use GPS tracking typically pay for it by charging sex offenders one-time hookup fees of $30 to $50 and daily rates of $5 to $20 to cover the equipment costs, Wagner said.
In Lycoming County, officials have spent more than $10,000 since January on GPS monitoring, said chief adult probation officer Bob McCullough. Offenders who cannot pay for the full cost of the monitoring are placed on a payment schedule, and in some cases they are allowed to work off those costs by performing community service, he said.
"We have had no problems whatsoever in terms of offenders paying their obligation," McCullough said.
-Could it be that they only had RSOs who could afford it, use it, certainly homeless folks cannot afford such fees when they cannot afford a place to live.
Like similar laws in all 50 states, Pennsylvania's Megan's Law is named for Megan Kanka, a 7-year-old New Jersey girl who was raped and killed in 1994 by a twice-convicted sex offender who lived near her home. ..News Source.. by MARTHA RAFFAELE
July 23, 2008
PA- Auditor general wants sex-offender GPS tracking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Is logic lost when folks become public servants?
No.. they forget that public servants.. serve the public.
In the words of Cincinnatus, The more I lead, the more I serve.
There is a great deal of responsibility in leadership, a great deal of conscience and consciousness that has been abandoned in the pursuit of power and control.
For instance, according to the Federalist Paper 57:
I will add, as a fifth circumstance in the situation of the House of Representatives, restraining them from oppressive measures, that they can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as on the great mass of the society.
These papers were what our country's constitution were founded on, part of the understanding of the agreements whereby our constitution granted power to the Congress.
They can either be bound, and the public bound, by the same restrictions as 'sex offenders'... or they can repeal it, according to the original agreement.
Post a Comment