Showing posts with label (...Advocacy - AWA Byrne Funding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label (...Advocacy - AWA Byrne Funding. Show all posts

December 13, 2009

The Money Tree is Picked Again, this time, 1.1 Trillion Green

12-13-2009 National:

A few days ago I reminded folks that states would not lose funds if they did not pass the Adam Walsh Act because state were funded additional amounts through the America Recover and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Thats still true and those monies have been made available to the states.

Normally I do not review "Appropriations" bills because they are to involved. Well I got curious because lately it seems our new administration seems to have a never ending money tree. Guess what, that old money tree is being shaken again its leaves are falling, and we are going GREEN.

Today the Senate passed the 2010 Fiscal Year Appropriations bill to the amount of -get this- 1.1 TRILLION dollars, yes I said trillion.

Within that 1.1 trillion are monies that will feed the Byrne Grants ($519 million for Byrne Justice Assistance Grants) and guess who else is being fed: the Adam Walsh Act ($353.5 million dollars). They also want to put another 1,400 police on the streets, another $298 million for COPS Hiring Grants. Are we becoming a police state?

Now remember the Second Chance Act, thats the one to help folks get re-established in the community after leaving prison. A GREAT program, but also remember it has a LOPE HOLE, not a dime for any sex offender program. These folks are left to flounder after leaving prison. No need to explain all the laws which deny sex offenders jobs, housing, and all sorts of other services and the newest, denial to the Internet.

I do see something that is excellent, $45 million for drug courts, hey guys did you forget about sex offender courts? New York has them (see HERE and HERE) and they have been a great success, but they are needed throughout the nation. Wake up lawmakers, smell the roses, sex offender courts and THERAPY will reduce sex offender recidivism! Maybe we should say it this way, fewer victims?

I also see they appropriated a mere pittance for the Legal Services Corporation ($420 million) thats for folks who cannot afford a lawyer in civil matters. And, of course, even though sex offender legislation is called civil, there isn't a dime allowed to be spent for those civil matters. i.e., like appealing a Adam Walsh Classification -OR- fighting to show how unconstitutional the entire Act is.

OK, 2010 is the year for a new census, and they have appropriated $7.3 BILLION to complete the new census. They plan to hire approximately one million workers nationwide, let me guess, bet they will exclude anyone with a prior sex offense.

Finally, no where have I ever seen the words trillion, billion and million used as much as in this appropriations bill. I wonder where those money trees are growing? Humm, I find it disturbing that all these monies are being spent in the name of protecting children, yet stealing from the pocketbooks of children of future generations, isn't a problem? Must be a perception thingy...

eAdvocate

PS: If you are so inclined the full bill in Congress is HR 2847.

Read More of Article...

December 9, 2009

The Adam Walsh Act is an "Unfunded Mandate," but, will the states lose any federal funding for not enacting AWA?

Has anyone wondered why ALL of Congress is not screaming about funding the Adam Walsh Act? NOTE: In 2008 the Justice Policy Institute estimated what it would cost each state to implment AWA -v- What the state would lose for not implmenting AWA.
12-9-2009 National:

The answer is simple, NO, states will not lose a dime for not enacting the provisions of AWA.

The states through the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009" have already received an unbelievable amount of money targeted for law enforcement and crime.

Here is the essence of how states are funded:

Yes, AWA says, if states fail to enact AWA they will lose 10% of Byrne funding.

However, within the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA 2009)" Byrne funding was supplemented with BILLIONS of dollars, and these funds CANNOT be denied the states.

So, what we have is: Byrne Fund -10% (each state's share of Byrne) +Billions from ARRA 2009. The net effect is the states stand to gain even though, in an accounting sense, they will technically lose 10% according to AWA.

From the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: ... DOJ Website for this Act:

State and Local Law Enforcement Activities

Office on Violence Against Women

violence against women prevention and prosecution programs

For an additional amount for `Violence Against Women Prevention and Prosecution Programs', $225,000,000 for grants to combat violence against women, as authorized by part T of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796gg et seq.): Provided, That, $50,000,000 shall be for transitional housing assistance grants for victims of domestic violence, stalking or sexual assault as authorized by section 40299 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-322).

Office of Justice Programs

state and local law enforcement assistance

For an additional amount for `State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance', $2,000,000,000, for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant program as authorized by subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Acts of 1968 (`1968 Act'), (except that section 1001(c), and the special rules for Puerto Rico under section 505(g), of the 1968 Act, shall not apply for purposes of this Act).

For an additional amount for `State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance', $225,000,000, for competitive grants to improve the functioning of the criminal justice system, to assist victims of crime (other than compensation), and youth mentoring grants.

......

For an additional amount for `State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance', $125,000,000, for assistance to law enforcement in rural States and rural areas, to prevent and combat crime, especially drug-related crime.

For an additional amount for `State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance', $50,000,000, for Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) initiatives.

Community Oriented Policing Services

For an additional amount for `Community Oriented Policing Services', for grants under section 1701 of title I of the 1968 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (42 U.S.C. 3796dd) for hiring and rehiring of additional career law enforcement officers under part Q of such title, notwithstanding subsection (i) of such section, $1,000,000,000.

Salaries and Expenses

For an additional amount, not elsewhere specified in this title, for management and administration and oversight of programs within the Office on Violence Against Women, the Office of Justice Programs, and the Community Oriented Policing Services Office, $10,000,000.

So who is kidding who?

Oh yes, there have also been other stimulus bills passed which I have skipped, not necessary since ARRA 2009 more than supplements states for the AWA losses.

eAdvocate

Read More of Article...