June 11, 2017
Child abuse database launched
GREENFIELD — A database that launched this week lists the names of people convicted of child abuse in the last five years.
State officials hope the new child abuse and neglect registry will become the tool parents use to ensure their children are cared for by someone trustworthy.
The online registry is similar to one listing convicted sex offenders.
Parents can search people by name at public.courts.in.gov (click on the link for the child abuse registry).
A person’s name will appear in the search results if they’ve been convicted of child neglect, battery or sexual assault against a child or child selling — crimes that statistics show are being reported more regularly throughout the state.
Child abuse and neglect cases are up nearly 20 percent statewide, according to the Indiana Department of Child Services.
In 2016, the agency handled 241 cases in which a Hancock County child had been neglected or abused, compared with 186 cases in 2015, according to department records. ..Continued..
June 4, 2017
30 Laws in 30 Days: More paroled sex offenders will have GPS anklets for life
INDIANAPOLIS (Statehouse File) – Detectives called him a master manipulator.
But Joseph Anderson’s scheming came to an end when a man called the Department of Child Services to report Anderson had shown him a screenshot of himself and a 9-year-old boy performing sex acts on each other.
After months in court, Anderson — who had already served prison time for two child sex cases and got out in 2010 — was convicted last August to 60 years in prison after pleading guilty to three felony counts of child molestation involving four children.
Sen. Joe Zakas, R-Granger, was propelled to write Senate Enrolled Act 38 after seeing headlines in the South Bend Tribune about Anderson’s conviction and other admitted crimes of molesting another 34 local, vulnerable children over many years.
“It gave me a need to author something for greater oversight,” he said.
Zakas also sees the law as another way to improve Indiana’s criminal laws and protect Hoosiers, a focus he has held throughout his 35 years in the Senate.
“Public safety is one of the most important things legislators do,” Zakas said. “We have a right to be safe in our homes and neighborhoods.”
The law, which was signed into law by Gov. Eric Holcomb and goes into effect July 1, does two things: ..Continued.. by Ashley Shuler
March 25, 2017
Indiana Inmates Could Have Computer Tablets by End of Year
Indiana prison officials have proposed providing inmates with computer tablets in an effort to help them connect with family and further their educations.
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Indiana prison officials have proposed providing inmates with computer tablets to help them connect with family and further their educations.
The proposal includes creating a secure network and installing electronic kiosks across nearly two dozen Indiana Department of Correction facilities. Vendor applications are due by April 24. The department hopes to get the program going by the end of the year, agency executive director William Wilson told The Indianapolis Star (http://indy.st/2mMMPm9 ).
Inmates could access classwork and self-help materials on the tablets. They also could order from the commissary or pay for entertainment. The money from entertainment would help pay for the program. The department hopes a vendor will pay the costs up front, then be reimbursed and earn a profit when inmates buy music and movies. Department officials also could reward good behavior by giving inmates access to entertainment on the tablets.
"Historically, corrections has always been based on consequences," Wilson said, "but what we've learned is that sometimes through positive reinforcement you gain better performance, better behavior."
The tablets likely wouldn't be like the iPads or Kindles common at homes. Companies develop special tablets and software for use in prisons that are more secure and can be controlled by prison officials.
There are concerns, though. Indiana Public Defender Council spokeswoman Kristin Casper worries inmates might face added fees for tablets.
"There's so much potential for this to be abused," Casper said. "That's our biggest issue with this."
Wilson envisions the tablets making prison tasks easier, such as allowing inmates to contact their cases managers, which now is done with paper and pen. Substance abuse and anger management programming can be offered on the tablets, too.
"Our goal is to make sure that when these guys do go back to their communities, that they can be a contributing member," Wilson said. "If we don't allow offenders to have real-world access to education, to programming, to electronic devices — then we've become part of the problem." ..Source.. by Information from: The Indianapolis Star
January 8, 2017
State lawmakers consider raising age of consent to 18
Should a 56-year-old legally be allowed to have a sex with a 16-year-old? One Indiana lawmaker says no.
State Rep. Karlee Macer, D-Indianapolis, said she intends to introduce a bill that would raise the age of consent from 16 to 18.
If the bill passes, Indiana would join about 11 other states in having the oldest age of consent in the country. The laws in most states — including Michigan, Ohio and Kentucky — allow 16-year-olds to consent to sexual intercourse, according to data provided by the National Conference of State Legislatures. Illinois' age of consent is 17.
Macer said she believes the bill would give prosecutors and judges another tool to hold people accountable for preying on children.
"I think what’s happening in our state with our children right now is a crisis," she said.
Macer said her bill would create a criminal offense called "indiscretion," which could be filed against someone at least 23 years old who engages in sexual conduct, fondling or touching with someone who is at least 16 but younger than 18. The bill had not been filed as of Friday evening.
Indiana law already makes it a crime for those in positions of power, such as teachers, coaches or mental health professionals, to have sex with someone under 18. But it is not a crime for other older adults, such as neighbors, co-workers or acquaintances, to have sex with someone as young as 16.
Connie Smith, public affairs officer for the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council, said her organization has neither seen the bill nor had an opportunity to discuss what, if any, stance it will take.
Larry Landis, executive director of the Indiana Public Defender Council, expressed concern about Macer's proposal.
In the past, he said his organization supported proposals to criminalize the sexual conduct of those who abuse positions of power, such as teachers or military recruiters. But Landis said a bill raising the age of consent to 18 may create more problems than it solves.
"You can’t over-legislate and say you’re going to control the sexual behavior of people," he said, adding, "It might prevent a few abuses, but generally it doesn’t. Deterrents generally have limited effectiveness because people don’t think they’re going to be caught. It sounds like a solution in search of a problem to me."
Indiana legislators considered raising the age of consent several years ago, but it stalled amid concerns about how the law would affect sexual relationships between younger individuals. Under current Indiana law, teenagers in ongoing relationships can have consensual sex if they are under 21 within four years of age difference.
Macer said her proposal would not affect "young love." The bill is needed, she said, to give authorities another way to stop sexual predators.
"We can do more," Macer said. "We can do better." ..Source.. by Marisa Kwiatkowski
February 12, 2016
Indiana Senate unanimously passes legislation to create child abuse registry
Database would be similar to sex offender registry
INDIANA —New legislation is making its way through the Indiana General Assembly to create an online public registry for convicted child abusers.
Indiana State Sen. Carlin Yoder authored the bill known as Kirk's Law in honor of a 19-month-old boy who died under the care of his babysitter in Northern Indiana.
The Senate unanimously passed the bill 49-0. It is currently in the House, recently referred to the Committee on Courts and Criminal Code.
"Lots of perpetrators are very good at being perpetrators and gain the trust of parents and children and everything, so it's really hard to find perpetrators," Sarah Brichto said.
Brichto is the executive director of the Children's Advocacy Center of Southeast Indiana. She works primarily with victims of child abuse and supports creating an online registry.
"Lots of times, they feel guilty because it's a parent's job to protect their children and lots of parents feel like they weren't up to the task or somehow failed," Brichto said.
The online database would be similar to the state sex offender registry and run by the Indiana State Police.
"It's really smart because the sexual offender registry, it works," Brichto said. "People, offenders will do almost anything to not get on that list because people really pay attention to that."
In Kentucky, Jennifer Diaz is working on creating Sophie's Law after her daughter Sophie was abused by the babysitter when she was six months old.
"I can't take away the fact that that woman hurt my child, I can't erase that and that's painful," Diaz said.
Diaz is still in the early stages of contacting doctors, prosecutors and lawmakers to author a bill, but she is willing to do the work to help protect other children.
"I don't want that to happen to any other child," Diaz said. "If I can prevent that from happening just by creating this registry and having everyone who's ever been convicted of child abuse on this registry, I'm hoping that's going to prevent them people from working with any children." ..Source.. by Emily Wood
February 5, 2016
Indiana Senate approves bill that would create child abuse registry
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - The Indiana Senate has passed a bill that would create a public registry of people convicted of child abuse or neglect.
The bill that would create a list similar to online sex-offender registries was passed by the Senate on Wednesday on a 49-0 vote. The bill was inspired by the death of 19-month-old Kirk Coleman who died of a brain injury in 2014 while being cared for by a baby-sitter who had previously pleaded guilty to child neglect. She is awaiting trial on a charge of felony battery resulting in death.
State Sen. Carlin Yoder authored the bill. The Republican from Middlebury calls it one more tool for parents to help assure the safety of their children.
The bill now goes to the House. ..Source.. by WHAS11.com
October 25, 2015
Anderson might avoid Indiana registry
Young man - who had sex with Niles girl who lied about age - removed from Elkhart list
Indiana authorities seem to agree Zachery Anderson — the young Elkhart man whose sex case involving a then-14-year-old Niles girl who admitted lying about her age has drawn a national outcry — does not deserve to remain on this state's sex offender registry.
Anderson won a more lenient sentence from a second Berrien County judge last week, one that left him with two years of probation and keeps him off Michigan's sex offender registry. His original sentence last spring included five years on probation and 25 years on Michigan's registry. That, in turn, landed him on Indiana's registry for life.
After last week's re-sentencing, the question lingered as to whether Anderson would remain on Indiana's list, and early indications were that he would.
That apparently changed Friday, when defense attorney Scott Grabel said he received word from a staff attorney for Indiana's probation committee, who reviewed Grabel's legal arguments and Indiana's law on interstate compacts. She wrote in an email that she agrees with Grabel, and the Elkhart County probation staff will be notified. Anderson does not meet with local probation officials until Thursday.
Meanwhile, Zach Anderson filed a request with the Elkhart County sheriff's department Thursday, asking to be removed from that county's sex offender site. Although the family received no official response, they found his name missing there as of Friday afternoon.
"We even checked this morning to make sure it wasn't an error," Zach's father, Lester, chuckled Saturday.
Lansing attorney Grabel sat Saturday he is impressed by how quickly Indiana authorities have responded.
"I don't think they're going to put him on (the registry)," he said. "I am extremely, cautiously optimistic. I think this will be the last big hurdle."
Grabel is still angry about how Berrien County Prosecutor Michael Sepic tried to discount a polygraph and psychological report during Monday's re-sentencing hearing before Judge Angela Pasula, and what he considered Sepic's unfair characterization of his client's actions.
What those reports showed was that Zach, who was 19 at the time, "in his heart and in his mind, he thought he was engaging in relations with a 17-year-old," Grabel said. Sepic "tried to distort that, and that was wrong."
Sepic declined further comment after the sentencing Monday.
Meanwhile, Les Anderson said his family is still interested in campaigning against sex offender registry laws nationwide, after hearing similar horror stories from all over the country. He agrees with calls to make underage teens who deceive others about their age also accountable somehow.
"It's just unbelievable, the mountain to climb on this issue," he said. "As soon as you say 'sex,' that crime is magnified beyond anything else."
But mostly, relying on their faith and their renewed closeness as a family, the Andersons seek a return to normalcy.
"We just feel relieved," Les Anderson said, "and we want to move on with life." ..Source.. by Virginia Black
September 13, 2015
Another Elkhart family copes with having son's name on sex offender registry
BRISTOL - Elkhart convicted sex offender Zach Anderson is one step closer to returning to a normal life.
On Friday, a new judge agreed to remove him from Michigan's sex offender list until his re-sentencing.
Anderson's case gained national attention, after a judge handed the then 19 year-old a maximum punishment for having sex with a 14-year-old girl who he said lied about her age.
Like Zach Anderson, Darian Yoder was 19-years-old when he found a girl on a dating app called Hot Or Not.
Yoder said she told him she was 17 and then they had sex the first time they met. Just like Anderson, Darian was convicted and registered as a sex offender.
"It's basically just work and occasionally I'll go to the gym, but I really have nothing else I can really do," said Yoder.
In both cases, the girls were from Niles and they even had the same judge, Dennis Wiley.
"With these guidelines, it's basically taken my life away," said Yoder.
Feeling alone and embarrassed the last time Fox 28 spoke to him, Yoder asked us not to show his face.
"I started to get a little bit more positive," said Yoder.
It was after reading about Anderson's case that Yoder and his family started to see a brighter side.
"If I didn't have support, I probably would have given up," her said.
Like Anderson's family, the Yoder's too, are working towards getting Darian's name removed from the sex offender registry.
"[It's] like a death in the family," said Vanissa Messick, Darian Yoders' mom.
She said she can't remember the last time she's seen her son smile.
"It's like you make a mistake in life, this is too much of a punishment for that person at that age even, you're going to make mistakes," she said.
A mistake that many like Anderson and Yoder have made and are trying to fix. Messick told Fox 28, the Anderson's are helping them try to appeal Yoder's conviction and get his name taken off the sex offender registry, but it will be a little harder because they are past the six month appeal threshold. ..Source.. by Shellye Leggett
July 27, 2015
Zachary Anderson: Online Hook-Up Lands Him On Sex Offender List — Victim And Her Parents Plead For His Charges To Be Dropped
Zachary Anderson is a 19-year-old computer science major from Elkhart, Indiana. Anderson met a girl from nearby Niles, Michigan, on the Hot or Not app. The two met up for an evening of consensual sex in December 2014. Six months later, Anderson finds himself serving a 90-day jail sentence, five years of probation, and he will be a registered sex offender until he turns 44.
The girl that Anderson hooked up with told him she was 17-years-old at the time. The girl is, in fact, 14-years-old. She has epilepsy, and on the night in question, she left home and failed to tell her mother where she was going. Her mom was worried that she had forgotten to take her medicine, so she called the local police.
According to the Daily Mail, law enforcement was waiting at the girl’s house when she arrived back from her night out with Anderson. Anderson drove back home and promptly went on vacation to Florida with his parents. It was on vacation that he received a text from the girl stating they were “in trouble.” At the time, Anderson still didn’t know the girls age.
At Zachary Anderson’s trial, the girl stated she didn’t want anything to happen to him. Her mother also spoke to the court.
“I don’t want him to be a sex offender because he really is not and I know that there’s an age difference and I realize that (name deleted) was inappropriate that night, we didn’t know. I’m very sorry and I hope you’ll really consider the fact of just dropping the case. I can’t say anything more than that. I hope you really will for all of our families.”Michigan has a program for first-time sex offender who have yet to reach the age of 21. Judge Dennis Wiley decided not to use it. He gave his reason.
“You went online, to use a fisherman’s expression, trolling for women to meet and have sex with. That seems to be part of our culture now: meet, hook up, have sex, sayonara. Totally inappropriate behavior. There is no excuse for this, whatsoever.”Zachary Anderson’s parents have taken to Change.org (Now over 100,000 signatures) hoping people will help. Anderson is not allowed to live in a house with an internet connection. He cannot talk to anyone who is under 17-years-old.
What do you feel should be the punishment for Zachary Anderson? Should the feelings of the girl and her mother have any influence on the incident in question? ..Source.. by Inquisitr
July 25, 2015
The Cruel, Petty Sentencing Practices of Judge Dennis Wiley
7-25-15 Michigan:
The guidelines were always too lenient.
Dennis Wiley is a district judge in Berrien County, Michigan. As you may have seen here, here, and even here, Wiley recently sentenced 19-year-old Zach Anderson to 90 days in jail and 25 years on the Sex Offender Registry. Anderson, a computer science student, was also banned from internet and smartphone. Wiley imposed this punishment even after Anderson’s victim—a 14-year-old who claimed to be 17 during a sexual encounter—and her mother asked the prosecutor’s office to drop the charges entirely.
During Anderson’s sentencing hearing, Wiley told him: “You went online…trolling for women to meet and have sex with. That seems to be part of our culture now: meet, hook up, have sex, sayonara. Totally inappropriate behavior. There is no excuse for this, whatsoever.”
The Anderson case was not Wiley’s first foray into scolding online daters. Wiley recently put another Indiana 19-year-old, Darian Yoder, on the sex offender registry for having consensual sex with a 13-year-old who also claimed to be of age. They met via the same “Hot or Not” app that Anderson used.
Yes, these teenagers went online to meet women. People do that in 2015. Wiley chose to make an example out of Anderson and Yoder because of his own moral qualms with modernity.
es, these teenagers went online to meet women. People do that in 2015. Wiley chose to make an example out of Anderson and Yoder because of his own moral qualms with modernity.
Unfortunately, these are just the most recent examples in a long line of cases where Wiley exercised his discretion in a manner that was especially harsh toward low-level offenders.
In April 2014, Wiley was censured for misconduct after he had LaRue Ford charged with contempt. Ford spent 10 nights in jail—including Christmas—after not paying $5,000 in bond. Her crime? Muttering “fuck this shit” while in the courthouse dealing with a traffic ticket. The courthouse staff that overheard Ford mentioned it to Wiley, who then took matters into his own hands.
Curtis Pedzinski, a 21-year-old native of St. Joseph, Michiga, was sentenced by Wiley to between 14 months and 2 years in prison for “unlawful use of a motor vehicle,” or joyriding. Years earlier, Pedzinski had been convicted of breaking and entering. Wiley’s sentence was significantly more severe than what state guidelines called; Wiley justified it by claiming that proper weight had not been given to Pedzinski’s past.
There was also the case of Reverend Edward Pinkney, a high-profile black leader from Benton Harbor. Benton Harbor, along with St. Joseph, are Berrien County's twin cities. Benton Harbor is about 90 percent black, while St. Joseph, the county seat, is about 85 percent white. The area has experienced a lot of racial tension over a long period of time, and Pinkney has been deeply involved for years, rubbing a lot of powerful people the wrong way. Alfred Butzbaugh, a Berrien County judge who had presided over an election fraud case involving Pinkney was the target of Pinkney’s fondness for bombastic language in an article written for a Chicago paper. In addition to calling Butzbaugh “corrupt,” “dumb,” and a racist, Pinkney wrote:
“Judge Butzbaugh, it shall come to pass…..that all these Curses shall come upon you and your family, curses shalt be in the City of St. Joseph and Cursed shalt thou be in the field, cursed shall come upon you and your family and overtake thee…..The Lord shall smite thee with consumption and with a fever and with an inflammation and with extreme burning. They the demons shall Pursue thee until thou persist.”
This threat, according to Wiley, was a violation of Pinkney’s probation, saying that Pinkney’s title of Reverend gave him a “direct line to the Lord” and that a reasonable person would find this to be a serious threat. Wiley sentenced him to 3-10 years in prison because of the threat’s supposed severity. Pinkney went to prison in June 2008 and remained there until his sentence was thrown out on appeal
Another defendant, Arthur Grice, was also a victim of Wiley’s overboard sentencing practices. In 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that the sentencing guideline variables were wrongly scored by Wiley in Grice’s trial for resisting arrest. The Court of Appeals found that every variable in the case against Grice was scored significantly higher than it should have been, leading to a more harsh sentence of between 46 months and 15 years in prison.
While sentencing guidelines aren’t set in stone, Michigan law says that departures are allowed “if the court has a substantial and compelling reason for that departure and states on the record the reasons for departure.” Judges can’t go outside the guidelines based on race, gender, nationality, appearance, etc.
But it seems like Wiley thinks he knows better than the sentencing guidelines—which he believes are almost always too lenient, no matter the severity of the crime. ..Source.. by Andy Welch is a Mattern Intern at Reason
December 16, 2014
Parks Board decision on restricting sex offenders pushed back
Enforcement remains a concern for several Vigo County Park Board members, as the board on Monday continued its discussion of whether or not people listed on the state’s sex offender registry should be banned from visiting county parks.
County Attorney Michael Wright told the board that the Indiana Supreme Court overturned an ordinance in Jeffersonville, found unconstitutional as it violated an individual’s rights who had been removed from the sex offender list. Some offenses require a person to be on the list only for 10 years, while other offenses place a person on the list for a lifetime.
The state supreme court upheld an ordinance adopted in Plainfield as it determined that visiting a park system is not a fundamental right protected under the state constitution or the U.S. constitution. That ordinance has a clause allowing people removed from the list to visit parks.
“Based on that, you can safely say if you enact an ordinance that has a certain level of protection in it, for cases as applied that are unconstitutional, then you are probably in a pretty defensible position from a litigation perspective,” Wright said.
However, Wright told the board that outside of Indiana, other states have not enacted such restrictive ordinances, instead considering “parks by nature are better when open.”
“I think that other jurisdictions outside the state of Indiana are probably looking at it from a common sense perspective and saying, ‘We are not really sure this is how we want to go,’” Wright told the board.
Indiana law does not prohibit those on the sex offender registry from visiting public parks, and Indiana state parks do not have a policy restricting sex offenders from entering parks.
Peggy Harlan, who is president of the board, along with board members Matt Schalburg and Jim Luzar questioned how the parks department could effectively enforce a county ordinance. Luzar said every person entering any of the county parks would have to be checked against sex offender lists and would delay access to the parks. The parks department does not have the manpower for such checks, Parks Superintendent Kara Kish told the board.
Luzar suggested instead of a blanket policy, the board consider focusing just on camping, as the parks department already has an application process. ..Source.. by Howard Greninger Tribune-Star
December 8, 2014
Unregistered sex offenders displayed on billboards in Marion County
This makes no sense at all, statistically these folks are not committing crimes. And murderers are not so treated. Which is more important to the safety of society? Idiots make these decisions and they somehow get elected..12-8-2014 Indiana:
UPDATE: Sex offender billboard campaign includes two deceased men They cannot get anything right...
Authorities are taking a new approach to get unregistered sex offenders off the streets of Marion County.
The Marion County Sheriff’s Office, U.S. Marshals Service and Crime Stoppers are collaborating to get the 40 most violent, unregistered sex offenders behind bars.
For the first time, authorities are using billboards as a way to advertise those unregistered sex offenders. They hope the general public will provide tips.
"We've put together this poster and this program to try and bring them in compliance. That's what we all want -- them in compliance -- but now they're wanted and now we need to get 'em off the street," director of Crime Stoppers Steve Dubois said.
An electronic billboard on Fall Creek Parkway displayed mug shots of unregistered sex offenders Monday morning.
"We want those neighbors to say, 'Hey that's John Doe, he takes his trash out every Tuesday, I see him over there,' and it turns out John Doe is one of the wanted sex offenders," Marion County sheriff’s deputy Brad Allen said.
In addition to the electronic billboard by the Indiana State Fairgrounds, two other static billboards will go up at Interstate 65 and North Lafayette Road and at the corner of Washington Street and Highland Avenue.
The billboards will be up for the next month. ..Source.. by Drew Smith
November 19, 2014
Cloverdale Police Department introduces new app
CLOVERDALE -- Crime fighting is now at the fingertips of Cloverdale residents as the Cloverdale Police Department launched a smartphone app on Monday. The department is hoping that the new app, MyPD, will not only raise community involvement and awareness, but keep up with the ever changing ways people view information.
The free app, which can be used on any iPhone or Android device, aims to easily and quickly connect residents with its local law enforcement and public safety agency by not only allowing users to give feedback and communicate information to the department, but residents will also receive news and alerts when needed.
"It's a good way to connect with the community," Cloverdale Town Marshal Mike Clark said. "This allows us to be able to let them get information to us and us get information to them."
MyPD allows users to obtain push notifications directly from the Cloverdale Police Department in such situations as road closures or amber alerts. Users can also ask questions, submit tips, commend officers for doing a good job, check out the most wanted persons as well as access crime maps and such things as the sex offender registry.
"Citizens can make anonymous tips to us and they truly are anonymous because they actually go through a third party before they come to us," Clark explained. "We have no access to whoever submitted it if they do it anonymously."
Residents will also be able to ask Clark and Sgt. Charlie Hallam questions in a timely fashion as well as have access to the email addresses of all Cloverdale Police officers.
Clark noted that after doing some research to better connect the department and the community, he stumbled upon MyPD and later gained more information before moving forward with the new project.
"I'm always looking for ways to connect us more with the community," Clark added. "Cloverdale will be only the second department in Indiana to have it, with West Lafayette being the first."
Users are reminded that the app should not be used in true emergency situations and 9-1-1 should still be used. Users are also reminded that it is a crime to make a false report to the Cloverdale Police Department.
"We encourage people to download the free app," Clark said. "Hopefully we can work together." ..Source.. by LAUREN BOUCHER
October 28, 2014
Freedom of Speech Squashed: Under the color of law?
This is a MUST MUST MUST read (3 musts no mistake). From With Justice for All (WJfA) blog; remember 3 MUSTS read! Definition of "Under Color of Law" by the U.S. Dep't of Justice10-28-2014 Indiana:
From WJfA Blog:
A little town in Indiana named Bedford did something this Halloween that I found particularly despicable. The past week or so I have been commenting fast and furiously, as often as possible, against the need to expend extra-ordinary efforts protecting trick-or-treaters against registrants and for the more-needed addition of traffic patrols Halloween evening and night. I was getting rather blase about it because the articles were much the same: for the town's or county's registered citizens, no decorations; no lights; no costumes; no handing out treats; no being on the streets; mandatory meetings.
Then this morning, this headline really caught my eye: "Police use creative video to warn community about sex offenders before Halloween." The opening paragraphs give the full picture--pun intended--better than I could paraphrase it:
- Halloween is just days away, and one central Indiana police department is getting the word out about local sex offenders.
- The Bedford Police Department made a Facebook video that shows the faces of the nearly 50 sex offenders living in the city.
My first thought was, "Well, crap. What if some kid sees his or her daddy or uncle or grandpa on there? Will there be any end to the grief for that child, to the harassment and bullying that will result from peers?"
My second thought was, "This is SO wrong." I started hunting for a way to post an objection. The article did not have a comment board attached. I found a Facebook page for the news outlet that posted the original article and dropped in this comment:
jump on over to With Justice for All blog, be ready for SHOCKING results...
May 19, 2014
Indiana's Sex Offender Monitoring, Management program inmate trap
5-19-2014 Indiana:
Incarcerated citizens, by virtue of their circumstances, should understand the significance of the Indiana Sex Offender Monitoring and Management program.
SOMM is proclaimed a “therapy” program. This program is funded by your tax dollars in an effort to rehabilitate sex offenders. Inmates are required to complete 30, 60 or 100 hours based on low, medium and high risk.
They are put in lower-education classrooms, and each inmate has to talk about his or her case, show remorse, explain how their behavior will be prevented in the future and then the instructor “deems” the inmate rehabilitated.
It is conducted as group counseling, and as in any counseling program, the individual is expected to admit having a problem and needing help. However, true counseling programs encourage and entrust voluntary admissions.
SOMM demands admissions be made as a way of avoiding punishment. This way of thinking is akin to the old days when police beat people or provided electric shock to select portions of the person’s anatomy until the confessions were obtained.
The Department of Corrections mandates that all persons convicted of a sex offense participate in the “voluntary” program or face a Code 116 Class A conduct report for failing to participate in a “mandatory” program. Code 116 provides that non cooperation cost the individual loss of good time credit class, time in seclusion and loss of other privileges, such as visitation, telephone contact with family and commissary.
Upon forced agreement to “participate,” the individual is required to sign a statement saying he is entering the program voluntarily. As the program progresses the individuals are again mandated (under the threat of Code 116) to admit their guilt and relate details of behavior verbally and in writing, even when the individual pled “not guilty” at trial. The SOMM “counselors” hold onto the position that finding of “guilty” by the court is absolute and there can be no error.
Everyone in prison is guilty, and it is not possible to be innocent and be in prison. Guilt must therefore be acknowledged. The only allowable exception to this is if there is an appeal or post-conviction petition already pending in court. But this, too, has a built-in trap. If the inmate is acting “pro se” (by himself without a lawyer) his action is not recognized by SOMM. Notification to SOMM of pending court action must come from a lawyer or the court. Anything the inmate may show on his own behalf is automatically deemed “fake.”
So an inmate who cannot meet SOMM rules to demonstrate pending court action, or inmates who plead “not guilty” and do not have court action pending, now must admit guilt or they are told that they are lying. They get removed from class, forced to take a questionable polygraph test against their will and be faced with Code 116. This is a clear violation of 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
The DOC hired Liberty Behavior Health Corp. (Indianapolis) to run its SOMM program. They execute it for profit. They staff the instructors and also administer all polygraph tests; one inmate was told by the man forcing him to take the polygraph test that one inmate in the last 27 tests passed.
Because of all this, many inmates, even those who pleaded “not guilty” at their trial, take the stance “tell them what they want to hear and get it over with.” These individuals think the information will stay “in house” and not affect them later. This is not true if someone originally pleaded “not guilty” and later tells stories to pacify SOMM; they may or may not be retried for the offense admitted. Yes, this would be a violation of the 5th Amendment. However, the individual also opens themselves up for a possible perjury charge, having lied to the court.
SOMM does not have client therapist confidentiality. What is said is noted and becomes part of the public record. No matter how much innocence is claimed, it is negated by a SOMM admission and that admission will affect the inmate forevermore.
Admit guilt, keep the earned good time and go home. Profess innocence and the good time earned is taken away, the individual stays in prison longer.
Indiana thinks this is legal and proper, and the General Assembly gave the Department of Correction permission to do this.
Welcome to a state where, to me, civil rights and the U.S. Constitution seem to have little meaning and where tax dollars are wasted on fake programs like the SOMM. ..Source.. by Joan Busche is a resident of Grabill. See other Opinions by Joan Busche HERE and HERE
January 28, 2014
Dept of Corrections ends local lodging for sex offenders
State Department of Correction officials say they are no longer sending recently released sex offenders to Muncie houses
The Indiana Department of Correction is no longer operating "DOC Assist" homes in Muncie's Old West End neighborhood.
The Star Press reported last June that two adjacent homes in the neighborhood — at 927 S. Elliott St. and 612 S. Elliott St. — for the past two years had been used by the DOC as temporary housing for recently released sex offenders from 11 Hoosier counties who had nowhere else to go.
Concerns raised by the article prompted a sometimes heated meeting last July 24 involving DOC employees, local officials including Mayor Dennis Tyler and Delaware County Prosecutor Jeffrey Arnold, and Old West End residents.
Those living near the houses said they were unhappy they had not been told about the "DOC Assist" program — or the proximity of sex offenders to their families. Tyler, noting the Muncie houses were the only such facilities in the 11-county district, said he didn't want the Old West End viewed as a "dumping ground" for offenders.
In an email exchange with The Star Press on Friday, Victoria Fafata, supervisor of the DOC's 11-county New Castle Parole District, confirmed there were no longer "DOC Assist" facilities in the Old West End, or elsewhere in Muncie or Delaware County.
She also said there were no such houses for recently released offenders in Blackford, Henry, Jay or Randolph counties.
Brad King, president of the Old West End Neighborhood Association, said Friday that "neighbors in the area feel bit of a relief," but said they were also concerned about "residential opportunities, job opportunities and support networks for the paroled sex offenders in Muncie and Delaware County."
King, who moderated the July meeting with DOC officials, said it was "never the intention of the neighborhood association to shut down this housing opportunity, but to make sure everyone was aware, safe, compliant with the law and situations like this were as transparent as possible." ..Continued.. by Douglas Walker
January 3, 2014
Local man finds possible child porn in tablet bought at pawn shop
An Indianapolis man got more than he bargained for when he picked up a tablet at a pawn shop.
James Eaker bought the Kindle Fire for his 18-year-old daughter, Jessica, as a Christmas gift. She opened it only to find multiple pornographic pictures and home videos involving what looks like a young girl.
“She started crying and hollering at me,” said Eaker. “I went over there and grabbed it from her. I looked at it and said, ‘Oh my God. What is happening?’ They made me so sick. I didn’t even want to look.”
Eaker immediately called Fox 59 and police. Detectives took the tablet in as evidence as they try to look into its former owner.
Jim has a message for anyone buying second-hand electronics.
“If you get something that’s old or used, please check yourself before you give it to a child,” he said. “I ruined my little girl’s Christmas on that end.”
Jim was given a new Kindle, but he hopes others would do the same thing he did if they find something suspicious.
“I just didn’t want it dropped. I didn’t want them to say, ‘Well, just delete this.’ That’s what we need to do.”
Police have not made any arrests. Initially, investigators are unable to determine the female’s age. They’ll need to do a thorough examination of the pictures and videos before charges, if any, are made. ..Source.w/Video.. by Yvonne Man
September 9, 2013
Indiana Man Gets 8 Months for Lie Detector Fraud
An Indiana man who taught federal job applicants and others how to beat lie-detector tests was sentenced to eight months in prison Friday in a case that raised questions about the right to teach people how to lie.
Chad Dixon, 34, of Marion, Ind., pleaded guilty in December to wire fraud and obstructing a government proceeding with his business, Polygraph Consultants of America.
Federal prosecutors said Dixon taught dozens of people, including applicants to be federal border guards, and he was good at his trade.
In arguing for probation, Dixon's lawyer, Nina Ginsberg, said teaching people how to lie on a polygraph was protected by the First Amendment. She said Dixon's only crime was explicitly advising prospective federal employees they should lie about having received his training.
"It may be unfortunate for federal law enforcement ... but it is protected speech to tell people how to lie on a polygraph," Ginsberg said.
Ginsberg said the case appeared to be the first of its kind in the country, and said it should be considered in the context of long-held doubts that many experts have about the reliability of lie detectors.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Phillips said teaching someone to beat a lie detector, when the instructor knows that his student wants to foil a federally administered exam, is a federal crime.
"He adopted their illegitimate ends as his own," Phillips told the judge.
Phillips said the real-world consequences of Dixon's actions were significant. Dixon trained between 70 and 100 people who paid him $1,000 for a day's work, including federal contractors seeking to keep top secret security clearances, Phillips said. Numerous clients were convicted sex offenders, though training those people was not a federal crime because their cases fall under state law.
"Mr. Dixon chose to enrich himself by teaching others how to convincingly lie, cheat and steal," Phillips said.
What's more, Phillip's said, is Dixon was effective. He said one of Dixon's customers was a Herndon, Va., man who had been convicted as a peeping tom and had to undergo polygraph tests as part of his probation. The man had failed seven consecutive tests before taking Dixon's course. He then passed three consecutive exams.
Dixon, who said in court papers that he turned to the polygraph business when work as an electrician dried up, told the judge he regrets his actions. In a letter to the court, he said he was motivated in part by his distaste for lie detector tests because of their inaccuracy. He said his training amounted to little more than telling people to relax on certain questions, and pinch their abdominal muscles and silently count backward in increments of three on other questions.
"I couldn't believe that this was enough to produce truthful charts," Dixon wrote. He said the simplicity of what he was teaching gave him "a false sense of security as to what I was doing."
Ginsberg said Dixon has received a lot of unsolicited advice from lawyers across the country since entering his guilty plea that he has committed no crime and should fight the charges. Ginsberg pointed out in court papers that dozens of people who provide similar services have not yet been charged.
The sentence was less than the 21 months sought by prosecutors. District Judge Liam O'Grady acknowledged that "the gray areas regarding the First Amendment right to teach these countermeasures are real." ..Source.. by MATTHEW BARAKAT
August 26, 2013
Should child porn victims collect?
2 want Ball State students to pay $5 million
In Tacoma, Wash., in 2002, three very young boys – a 6-year-old and two 4-year-old twins – were removed from their home and placed in the care of Ronald and Wendy Young.
Licensed foster care providers, the couple turned their home into an even darker nightmare. In that home, the young boys were subjected to horrific and relentless sexual abuse that lasted for nearly two years, and was well-documented by Ronald Young in nearly 800 photographs he distributed to other like-minded pedophiles through the Internet.
Though he is serving 25 years in the Washington state prison system, the pictures live on, and in November they were found on the computer of Ball State University student Joseph Topp in his dorm room. And the 20-year-old Topp, an Angola native, shared the pictures as well.
In July, Topp pleaded guilty to a single charge of distribution of child pornography and faces more than five years in prison when he is sentenced in November.
He also faces a $5 million restitution claim from the anonymous Washington boys – now teenagers and living with their adoptive family.
Whether Topp will have to pay, or should have to pay, is a matter vexing courts around the country, even as the practice of filing restitution claims in child pornography cases is growing.
The case of Doyle Randall Paroline vs. U.S. is now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court – asking specifically what, if any, relationship between the defendant’s possession of child pornography and the victims’ harm must be established in order to claim restitution.
A few other such claims have been filed in the Hammond division of the Northern District of Indiana, and the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has already weighed in, but Topp’s case is the first in the Fort Wayne division. ..continued.. by Rebecca S. Green
August 18, 2013
Indiana team leads fight against child pornography
INDIANAPOLIS — In a cluttered office cubicle in a nondescript building on Indianapolis' derelict east side, a man with rolled-up shirt sleeves scans email attachments of videos that depict startlingly young children being sexually tormented in ways that can make even federal judges weep.
Detective Kurt Spivey is trying to find the people who record or collect such images. He has 30 days to locate as many as he can. After that, the trail could go cold as the data on the hard drive dissolves.
Spivey is a 43-year-old police detective who parlayed his nine years in vice and experience with computers into a position on the city's cybercrime unit. It's part of central Indiana's Internet Crimes Against Children task force, which has become one of the nation's most aggressive and effective child pornography hunters, with a reach that extends around the globe.
"They are really cutting-edge," said Francey Hakes, who worked for three years as a special assistant to the U.S. Attorney General overseeing child exploitation units in various agencies within the Justice Department. "I would say that most districts that have learned of some of the techniques and tactics used there have tried to model and adopt them as best they can."
At first blush, Indiana isn't a likely location for such a group. Though it has its share of violent crime, the state is better known for its hospitality, auto racing and love of basketball than as an international hotbed of perversion.
Yet in 2011, the latest year for which U.S. Department of Justice statistics are available, Indiana's task force made 166 arrests for manufacturing, distributing or possessing child pornography. New York City's task force made 16 arrests, and Chicago's team made 71.
And Indiana did all this with about $100,000 less funding than New York City.
Much of the success of the Indiana team, which includes federal, state and local agencies, stems from the reach the Internet provides. The team also benefits from a rare level of cooperation among the law enforcement agencies that has largely eliminated turf wars. ...continued... by CHARLES WILSON





