January 11, 2016
Study: Women more likely to have same-sex relationship than men
A new study suggests that women are more likely than men to be in a same-sex relationship.
CBS News reports the study, conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics, showed that women under the age of 45 are “three times as likely to report same-sex intimacy as men.” The study also found that seven percent of the women in the survey identified as gay or bisexual compared to four percent of the men.
"The visibility and recognition of bisexuality as a sexual orientation has been growing recently, particularly among younger people," Stephanie Sanders, an associate director of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction at Indiana University, said. "Research suggests that the women may have been more likely to label themselves as lesbians in the past and are more likely to use the bisexual label now."
Sanders, who was not affiliated with the study, cautioned that the results could be misleading since they defined intimacy as any sexual experience with another female and men are more reluctant to be open about sexuality.
Surveys show that women tend to be more accepting of being gay and bisexual, and we certainly live in a culture that tends to eroticize the idea of sex between women," Brian Mustanski, an associate professor with the department of medical social sciences at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, told CBS News. "When you couple these factors with biological tendencies, it's not surprising we see more bisexuality in women."
The study was conducted from 2011 until 2013 and analyzed responses from 9,200 women and men ages 18 to 44. It also found that 17 percent of women have “reported having same-sex contact in their lives” compared to only six percent of men.
Read more at CBS News. ..Source.. by Zach Dennis
December 1, 2015
Freezing weather, shelters, and sex offenders; it's deja vu all over again
See also: Man found in snow dead had no place to turn and Where will they go? Homeless desperate for a warm bed12-1-15 California:
A month shy of a year ago, I posted a long and bitter post about the policy of at least one homeless shelter regarding sex offenders. That place, as part of its general policy, excluded anyone on the sex offender registry from, literally, coming in from the cold.
Parts of California, it seems, are having uncharacteristically cold weather this year--and it isn't even winter yet. A shelter in Sacramento with the Biblically-referenced name of Loaves and Fishes has teamed up with area churches from late November to the beginning of next April with a program called Winter Sanctuary. This service offers a meal and a place to sleep out of the elements for the cities' homeless. It unquestionably is doing good work, needed work, and I read the article about it with equal amounts of increasing admiration for what they are doing and guilt for not doing more myself for those less fortunate.
And then, close to the bottom, there it was. After a short digression about the behavior of someone who was obviously suffering a mental or emotional problem was the statement, "The screening process is intended to weed out sex offenders or those who are intoxicated or agitated."
Weed out sex offenders. Does this mean those who are actively offending as they are applying for admission to the shelter? Could it be that someone on the screening committee had personal knowledge that certain individuals had just committed sexual offenses and intended to do so again? ..Continued.. by Shelomith Stow
September 30, 2015
The social costs of juveniles on sex-offender registries far outweigh benefits
WASHINGTON (Sept. 29, 2015) – The net social cost of applying sex-offender registration and notification laws to those who commit offenses as juveniles could be as high as $3 billion a year, with most of those costs incurred by neighbors of registered offenders, according to a new benefit-cost analysis from the R Street Institute.
Author and R Street Associate Fellow Richard B. Belzer found that including juveniles in sex-offender registries produced net costs of between -$40 million and -$1 billion per year, while only reducing sex-offense recidivism by about one-eighth.
“Registration would have to reduce incidence by at least 60 percent to yield positive net benefits,” Belzer wrote. “Incidence reductions of this magnitude has not been observed anywhere, or even suggested by committed registration advocates.”
Applying notification laws to juvenile offenders produces no identifiable social benefits, with social costs that range from $400 million to $2 billion per year. About 75 percent of notification costs are actually incurred by neighbors.
“The analysis shows that public notification is almost certainly a highly cost-ineffective way to reduce future sex offenses,” Belzer wrote. “No evidence has been found indicating that there are any social benefits. Thus, reform of notification laws appears to be the most plausible class of reform alternative that warrants consideration from an economic-efficiency perspective.”
The paper offers a retrospective analysis the draws from the literature on the effects of federal laws like the Adam Walsh Act and Megan’s Law, as well as state sex-offender registries, to outline costs borne by various entities, including the registrants themselves, their families, homeowners, renters and landlords, businesses, schools and the public.
Belzer also uses a prospective benefit-cost analysis that could use reforms to lessen some of the costs associated with the registry. These include exempting certain groups of offenders, terminating new registrations for certain kinds of offenders or enacting stays of notification pending future good conduct.
“The mere presence of information in the public domain means that the costs to juvenile offenders of public notification are, for all practical purposes, already sunk,” Belzer writes. “Nearly all benefits from reform will accrue from the non-registration or nondisclosure of registry status of new juvenile offenders.” ..Source.. by Nicole Roeberg
August 1, 2015
Slate Article: The Ridiculous Laws That Put People on the Sex Offender List
Slate published a similar series worth reading, see "Listed for Life" which has links to all of the articles.8-12-2014 National:
Three maps show states that register people as sex offenders for consensual teenage sex, peeing in public, and prostitution.
On his 18th birthday, Virgil McCranie and his 14-year-old girlfriend of one year, Misty, decided to have sex. Because of their ages, that meant McCranie committed the crime of statutory rape. When Misty told her father months later, after finding out that McCranie had cheated on her, he went to the police. In 1994, McCranie struck a deal with prosecutors, pleading no contest to lewd and lascivious behavior. He avoided prison, but as part of the deal, he had to register as a sex offender.
In time, Virgil and Misty reconciled, eventually got married, and began raising four children together. “It was a mistake, it happened, I’ve been with her since, I’ve loved her before then,” he told a local news channel 14 years later.
At that moment, McCranie was a still a registered sex offender. He says that he lost 17 jobs because of his status. Worse, he couldn’t attend his sons’ games and his daughter’s dance recitals. “I wish I could take it back,” Misty told the Florida Sun-Sentinel. “Once we got back together I realized how detrimental it was to him.”
In the end, McCranie was one of the lucky ones. He applied to then–Florida Gov. Charlie Crist for a pardon and received one. Others like him, however, remain on the registries. In at least 29 states—from Alabama to Wisconsin—consensual sex between teenagers is a crime that can lead to sex offender status. “No group is out there saying that they want Romeo and Juliet to be on the registry,” Brenda Jones, executive director of Reform Sex Offender Laws, a volunteer advocacy group, told me. “But lawmakers aren’t paying attention, and we as constituents are not aware.”
As you can see in the maps below, consensual sex between teenagers is just one of several crimes far removed from violent felonies that can land one on a sex offender registry. Kansas and at least five other states require registration for some prostitution-related offences, such as solicitation or running a brothel. In Michigan and at least 11 other states, urinating in public is.*
One possible reason for the long list of registry-worthy crimes is plea bargains like McCranie’s. Lawmakers may be ensuring that sex offenders won’t escape registration by pleading to lower-level offenses. But at what cost? ..Continue to Maps.. by Chanakya Sethi
July 28, 2015
False rape accuser who caused man to be arrested is given 'strong words of advice' by police
A woman claimed she was raped, so the police went into action and did what they normally do when that occurs. They cordoned off the area where the rape occurred, and they arrested a 32-year-old male scapegoat.
One little problem. It turned out there was no rape. An innocent young man had been wrongly arrested.
So, the police went into action and did what they normally do when that occurs. They thanked the public "for their patience" while they conducted inquiries into the incident-that-never-was, and then -- they let the woman go. Not a single charge was lodged against her. Her name wasn't even mentioned in the various news articles about the incident. Her anonymity is in tact, so the next man who's wrongly arrested on her say-so won't have any way of identifying her as a serial false rape accuser.
Oh, but wait, dear reader. Don't think for a minute that that this woman wasn't punished for subjecting a young man to one of the worst things that can happen to a human being. A police spokeswoman said this: “The woman has been given strong words of advice by police for her actions.”
Read it again: "strong words of advice." Yep. Imagine if you read a story about a rapist being given "strong words of advice." What do you think would happen to that police chief? But for false rape accusers, that's as much punishment as they deserve. It's business-as-usual in our "rape culture."
Is it any wonder that rape accusers believe, with justification, they can cry rape with impunity, for any or no reason at all? A female bus driver lied about being gang raped so she could get her hours at work switched. Women have lied about rape to avoid taking the bar exam and to exact revenge on boyfriends who take too long to buy cigarettes and on men who refuse to buy them a beer. One false rape accuser was just "bored." Cab drivers are a favorite target of false accusers looking for a free fare. The list goes on and on. They lie because they are rarely punished, and they know it. As a result, serial false rape accusers aren't just tolerated, they are rewarded for telling successful lies. See here and here. And even when they are caught, their enablers in the sexual grievance industry insist they should not be prosecuted, much less punished. When a 15-year-old girl told a rape lie that got a 14-year-old boy arrested, anti-rape campaigners said "it is awful that a girl so young has been prosecuted in this way." ..Continued.. by COTWA
July 22, 2015
What happened to news articles about sex offender issues?
7-2-2013 National:
It was just over 2 years ago that Google stopped their Google Reader service and I wrote about the effect that would have on sex offender advocacy; no need to repeat all the reasons news is needed for advocacy. Google Alerts kinda replaced Google Reader but does not have all the functions of Google Reader; Google Alerts are a really poor replacement but better than nothing (we have just over 100 setup).
Well here we are today wondering whats happening to News about issues surrounding sex offender laws and the registrants required to follow them? Where is the news? We are checking our Google Alerts when they show up, but, that is the problem, at best we are getting 3-5 a day when we used to get 100 or more.
Figuring the problem is Google Alerts we decided to try doing the Alerts by hand, a very time consuming task. Guess what the news just isn't being found in Google Searches, yes there are those which are very old or on topics like new crimes, and even those are few.
So it appears we have hit a slump in news, Journalists are just not writing about sex offender issues, so it seems. Has the world become complacent about these issues? Are articles written, if any, not generating enough income to spend time writing them? We just don't know.
Its summertime and that does account for slow news, but allowing for that, where do we go from here?
ACTION ALERT: Folks that do find a local article on sex offender issues, please forward the link so we can post for other folks. Please send links to eAdvocate@yahoo.comWe will keep readers updated on this essential topic. Stop back from time to time.
Thanks, we appreciate input, thoughts or suggestions.
PS: We are also monitoring Campus issues, and one issues is related to being drunk on campus. Well here is that big news today "'Drunk' squirrel reportedly causes damage in U.K. pub"
June 13, 2015
Opinion: Why do we treat teens like tots?
6-12-15 National:
When Walt Disney was 16, he forged his parents' signatures and lied about his age so he could join the Red Cross. That's how he found himself in Europe, just after World War I ended, driving ambulances.
He loved it. He said it "added up to a lifetime of experience in one package." He later put it this way: "I know being on my own at an early age has made me more self-reliant and less of a the-world-owes-me-a-living type than I otherwise would have been."
I have to thank the book "Teen 2.0," by Robert Epstein, for that story and for putting the whole idea that teens are lazy, incompetent and irresponsible on trial. Is it that "kids today" are really so immature? Or is that we treat them as if they are, and they respond the way most of us do when dissed or diminished — by disappointing?
Over the past generation or two, we have come to think of young people as less and less competent. I usually notice this with younger kids — how we drive them to school, as if it's always too cold or too far. How we insert ourselves into their squabbles, as if they couldn't sort things out by themselves. How we organize their lives for them — I've done this myself — as if leaving them to their own devices would mean wasted time, a teachable moment that we failed to fill.
But teens, man! Lately, we act as if there's no difference between 13 and 3. In my town, New York City, there is no specific minimum age for latchkey kids, thank goodness. But Illinois law states that no one should be home alone until age 14 — an age when many kids in my generation had already been baby-sitting for two or three (or four!) years. Now the 14-year-olds are the babies themselves.
Or how about crossing guards? My crossing guard when I was a tyke was a 10-year-old. Now the 10-year-olds are the tykes, and the guards are all adults.
Deliver newspapers? The folks who bring ours here in Jackson Heights do it by car. Most newspapers require their delivery people to have a license and liability insurance. If you're just a kid with a bike? Too bad.
And as for the laws about sex, we act as if anyone with any stirrings of anything before 18 is either a perp or a victim. Sometimes they're both. A case in 2006 involved a 13-year-old Utah girl who had consensual sex with her 12-year-old boyfriend. I don't know of anyone who loves the idea of kids that young sleeping together, but here's something worse: She was found guilty of having sex with someone under 14.
And so was he!
That makes them both sex offenders (and both victims). As I learned from Nicole Pittman, an expert on the sex offender laws I heard speak at an NYU School of Law symposium, of the 800,000 or so people on the sex offender registry nationwide, 200,000 are younger than 18. That's because teens have sex with other teens — a fact that shouldn't be news — and when the sex is consensual, it shouldn't be considered rape.
Shackling a teen with the label of "sex offender" often means they are not allowed to go to school (because there are other kids there) or even live at home, if there are younger siblings in the house. Sometimes they can't live near a park, a church, a day care center — even though it's not that they ever raped a toddler; it's that they slept with someone about their own age, as teens always have.
It's only now that we're treating teens like toddlers themselves that we are stunting them as humans and hunting them down for having sex. Really, it's time for someone to grow up.
Us. ..Source.. by Lenore Skenazy who is author of the book and blog "Free-Range Kids" and a keynote speaker at conferences, companies and schools. lskenazy@yahoo.com
May 28, 2015
This woman is trying to stop juvenile sex offenders — by helping them
Elizabeth Letourneau is one of the country's leading experts on sex crime — why it happens and whether there are better ways to stop it. She focuses in particular on juvenile sex offenders: people who commit a sex crime before they turn 18. This is an important group to understand in the fight against child sex abuse. Juvenile sex offenders perpetrate approximately one-third of sexual offenses against minors.
They are also are more likely than adult offenders to commit crimes against younger victims. That's why it's so important to figure out the most effective ways to treat them. Understanding what makes them offend and intervening in innovative ways can protect other kids.
As the director of the Moore Center for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse at Johns Hopkins University, Letourneau has devoted her career to trying to do just that. Letourneau and I spoke recently about why adolescents commit sex crimes, and how to stop sex abuse before it happens. ..Continued.. by Sarah Kliff
December 23, 2014
Sex offender registry not the answer
12-23-2014 National:
Let’s get real folks! Ariel Castro (Ohio), Jerry Sandusky (PA) and many others we hear and read about were not on any public registry and that is exactly the point. The public has been groomed to believe all they have to do is check a registry and be aware of “those on it” and their family will be safe. The truth of the matter is that according to credible studies the recidivism rate for another “sexual” offense is 3.5 percent and those who are beginning to educate families are advising the other 93-95 percent of sexual offenses come from within the victim’s family, friends and those having access to the children and those never get reported.
There are over 774,600 men, women and children (as young as 6, 8 and 10 in some states) required to register and the "crimes" range from urinating in public (indecent exposure), sexting, incest, mooning, exposure, false accusations by a soon-to-be ex-wife, angry girlfriend, or spiteful student, viewing abusive or suggestive images of anyone 18 years old or younger, playing doctor, prostitution, solicitation, Romeo and Juliet consensual sexual dating relationships, rape, endangering the welfare of a child and many others.
If you multiply the number on the registry by two or three family members you can clearly see there are well over three million wives, children, moms, aunts, girlfriends, grandmothers and other family members who experience the collateral damage of being harassed, threatened, children beaten, have signs placed in their yards, homes set on fire, vehicles damaged, asked to leave their churches and other organizations, children passed over for educational opportunities, have flyers distributed around their neighborhood, wives lose their jobs when someone learns they are married to a registrant....all these things occur when these people try to hold their family together and provide the three things that professionals state are needed for successful re-integration; a job, a place to live, and a good support system.
Education is the key. We need to set up Child Sexual Abuse Prevention training programs to empower kids and teens to protect themselves as much as possible and to speak up if someone makes them uncomfortable or oversteps their bounds. Programs like radKIDs and others are great tools. Parents cannot be everywhere.
Residency restrictions push former offenders away from the supervision, treatment, stability, and supportive networks they may need to build and maintain successful, law-abiding lives. As one Iowa sheriff said, "We are less safe as a community now than we were before the residency restrictions."
Throughout the United States, courts have found residency laws unconstitutional because they are punitive or against the Ex Post Facto laws.
Many child safety and rape prevention advocates would like to see more money spent on prevention, education, and awareness programs for children and adults, counseling for victims of sexual violence, and programs that facilitate treatment and the transition back to society for convicted sex offenders. ..Source.. by Vicki Henry, President, Women Against Registry
December 7, 2014
Sex Crimes on Campus: Professors as Judges
See Also: Rolling Stone's University Rape Story Unravels Thanks To Source12-6-2014 National:
The folly of letting amateurs handle serious crimes
THE uproar about sexual assaults on American college campuses is growing louder. Barack Obama has called them “an affront to our basic humanity”. Several universities—including Johns Hopkins, San Diego State, Emory, MIT, Clemson and the University of Virginia—have shut down or suspended parties at their fraternities in recent months. This week Wesleyan University in Connecticut banned a fraternity from holding social events for a year following two allegations of assaults at booze-fuelled revels. Meanwhile, 90 schools in 35 states are under investigation by the federal Department of Education for mishandling cases of sexual violence.
Rape and sexual assault in America have declined sharply since the mid-1990s, to 1.1 per 1,000 women per year (see chart). And students are no more likely to be assaulted than non-students of the same age, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (though its numbers are somewhat out of date). Yet activists insist that American campuses—and especially fraternities—nurture a “rape culture”.
They often cite an estimate that one woman in five will be sexually assaulted during her time in college, which comes from a report prepared for the Justice Department in 2007. Skeptics doubt this estimate, noting that it was based on a small sample (an online survey of two universities) and used a broad definition of sexual assault, which included everything from rape to any kind of “unwanted sexual contact”, as well as any encounter where one party was too intoxicated by alcohol or drugs to give informed consent.
Reports of horrific individual cases have brought extra attention to the issue. Rolling Stone recently published an account of an alleged gang-rape at the University of Virginia, where a student says she was attacked by seven men while lying on shards of a broken glass-topped table. The magazine appears not to have interviewed the (un-named) alleged perpetrators, so it is unclear how they respond to the charges*.
In 2011 the Department of Education sent colleges a letter warning that if they did not take steps to curtail sexual violence, they could be in violation of Title IX, a federal anti-discrimination law. It urged schools to set up committees to adjudicate complaints of sexual wrongdoing, even of heinous crimes such as rape. These committees often consist of untrained professors, administrators and students. The director of a campus bookstore served on a judgment panel for one college last year.
Under this system, defendants and victims have no right to legal counsel and no opportunity to cross-examine witnesses. Colleges typically determine guilt based on the civil “preponderance of the evidence” standard, meaning it is more likely than not that the perpetrator committed the crime, rather than the far tougher “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard, which is used in criminal courts. Panels cannot jail wrongdoers, but they can expel them.
Students on both sides of the fence have complained that these amateur tribunals are inept. A lawsuit this year alleged that Columbia University unfairly allowed perpetrators to remain on campus. Meanwhile male students at Vassar, Duke, and the University of Michigan have sued their schools, claiming that campus committees found them guilty of sexual misconduct when they were innocent. At Harvard 28 law professors recently criticised the university’s new sexual-assault procedures as lacking “the most basic elements of fairness and due process”.
Critics of the system argue that crimes should be dealt with by the police and the courts. In colleges as in the wider world, most rape victims never report the attack to the police. Studies suggest that the vast majority of campus assaults are committed by a small fraction of college men who tend to rape over and over again. So campuses would be safer if these habitual offenders were swiftly identified and arrested, rather than just expelled—leaving them free to go to another college and rape again.
Other critics think that colleges—and the government—should regulate alcohol more realistically. Binge-drinking is common on campuses, and cited in many complaints of sexual transgressions. But because students under 21 have no legal way to obtain alcohol, they tend to party in places where there is no adult supervision nearby, such as in fraternity houses, which are not technically part of the university. The head of the University of Virginia notes that students at frat parties often have no idea how strong their drinks are. (At some parties, the hosts mix everything up in a trash can.)
The lack of adult supervision has had dire consequences: men in fraternities are three times more likely to rape than other men on campus, according to John Foubert of Oklahoma State University. If the drinking age were lowered, parties could be held on campus and colleges could supervise them better, critics say.
* On December 5th Will Dana, the managing editor of Rolling Stone, issued a note to readers saying that the gang rape story they published may have been inaccurate. ..Source.. by The Economist
October 30, 2014
Are Sex Offenders Unfairly Persecuted on Halloween?
10-30-2014 National:
On Halloween night, Andrew will celebrate the holiday the way most married fathers do: He and his wife will go trick-or-treating with their two kids, who are nine and 12; maybe afterward, they’ll head to their church to finish off the night with games and snacks.
But Andrew’s family isn’t like other families, because Andrew is a registered sex offender.
Sex offenders are the closest thing we have to real-life monsters on Halloween—and surely, few things can horrify a parent like the thought of his or her child being snatched up by a pervert while trick-or-treating. But there is no evidence that children are more likely to be abducted, assaulted, or abused on Halloween than on any other day. Crime data from the National Incident-Based Reporting System shows that there is no recorded spike in sex crimes before or after the holiday.
Even so, many states have adopted draconian measures to protect kids from stranger danger on Halloween. In Missouri, if you're on the sex-offender registry on October 31, you have to be in your house from 5 PM to 10:30 PM unless you have a really good reason; you also have to turn off your porch lights and put up a sign announcing "No candy or treats at this residence." Other states and local jurisdictions have similar restrictions that prohibit sex offenders from dressing up in costumes, decorating their homes, or driving after dark.
These regulations, which extend the reach of Megan’s Law—a nickname for a category of statutes that are designed to prevent child molesters from preying on the kids in their neighborhood—would be a great help if sex offenders were all fundamentally evil would-be rapists and killers. But most registered sex offenders are not convicted of violent crimes. The crimes that can make you a "sex offender" range from rape to sexting with a teen to—in some states—public urination. And it should be noted that even for more serious crimes, recidivism rates for sex offenders are extremely low—only about 5 percent commit another sex crime after being released from prison. In 2008 the Department of Justice concluded that “Megan’s Law showed no demonstrable effect in reducing sexual re-offenses." So why have these Halloween restrictions at all? ..Continued..Below Video.. by Arielle Pardes
October 29, 2014
Three Ways Parents are Ruining Halloween
10-29-2014 National:
Facts don't stop fear.
Happy Halloween! It's that time of year when your neighbors are secretly unwrapping candy, brushing lollipops with poison, and inserting razor blades into Snickers bars!
Actually, while it may be a holiday tradition view your neighbors as psychopaths who patiently wait for the one day of the year to kill the local kids, in fact no child has ever been killed by a stranger's poisoned candy. Ever. But facts don't stop fear. Here are three ways in which our misguided terror on Halloween is killing all the fun.
Don't Go Outside
Parents are so scared of letting their kids roam free, that—no joke—there's a trend called "Trunk or Treat." Cars gather in a circle and kids go from one trunk to the next to grab candy, as if walking in a circle in a parking lot and collecting sugar is the whole point of the holiday. Sugar is important, but so is going outside on your own with your friends.
Some towns are so scared of the holiday that they've placed curfews on trick or treating. It's medieval. It's as if they really believe the ghouls come out at night.
It's Too Scary
There are schools, churches, and community centers sending home notes begging parents not to let their kids wear costumes that are "too scary," as if kids can't handle an eyeball oozing blood anymore. One town even made a guy take down the zombie decorations in his front yard because they were too realistic. In other words…they looked too much like real zombies?
Sex Offender Hysteria
In some towns, registered sex offender have to turn off the lights to keep the trick or treaters away, or all gather together at the local precinct like some twisted version of study hall. The rules are different in different places. But they're all based on the idea that sex offenders pounce on trick or treaters. Which turns out to be, like the poison candy story, completely false.
A recent study by a researcher now at Johns Hopkins University found that there is zero increase in child sex offenses on Halloween. In fact, the author Elizabeth Letourneau considered titling the study, "Halloween: The Safest Day of the Year," because it is, when it comes to sex crimes.
There is one thing to fear on Halloween: cars. More kids get hit by cars on Halloween than any other day for obvious reasons. There are more kids outside. So if we really wanted to make the holiday safer we'd take the cops checking up on sex offenders and put them on traffic patrol instead, slowing down drivers, or helping kids across. That could save some lives. Because cars are actually dangerous, unlike slightly torn Snickers bars. ..Source.. by Lenore Skenazy. Shot and edited by Jim Epstein. Graphics by Meredith Bragg
Posted:
9:41 PM
0
comments
Labels: .National, (.Halloween 2014, Fear Mongers, Halloween, Halloween - Levenson
October 28, 2014
Halloween Facts 2014: 10 Things You Probably Didn't Know About All Hallows' Eve
10-28-2014 National:
Many people celebrate Halloween simply because it's fun. But that doesn't offer an explanation as to why children dress up in costumes and ask strangers for treats. Nor does it explain why orange and black are the holiday's reigning colors. Here are 10 spooky facts you need to know about Halloween before the holiday Friday:
- 1) Halloween was inspired by the Irish Celtic festival Samhain, which celebrates the end of the harvest season. The tradition spread to other parts of the world after the Irish fled their country following the potato famine.
- 2) Most people know orange and black are traditional Halloween colors, but might not know why. Orange represents the fall harvest and black represents the darkness associated with death of summer.
- 3) Trick-or-treating might have stemmed from the superstition ghosts could disguise themselves in human form and knock on doors to ask for money or food. If they were denied, the spirit could curse or haunt the person who refused.
- 4) Like many Halloween traditions, jack-o'-lanterns originated in Ireland. People used to place candles in hollowed-out turnips -- instead of pumpkins -- to keep away spirits and ghosts on Samhain.
- 5) Carving pumpkins into jack-o'-lanterns comes from Celtic folklore. Tradition claims an intoxicated farmer named Jack tricked the devil, but paid the ultimate price when neither heaven nor hell would accept him. Since he was stuck in limbo, Jack created a lantern out of a turnip and a burned lump of coal the devil gave him from hell to guide his lost soul. People then carved jack-o'-lanterns with terrifying faces in hopes of scaring the evil spirits away.
- 6) Since it was thought the boundary between the worlds of the living and the dead blurred on Oct. 31, which allowed the dead to walk among the living, humans would wear masks and costumes so the spirits would not recognize them.
- 7) Here’s how the broomstick became associated with witches: Elderly women who were accused of witchcraft were usually poor and could not afford horses, so they would use a walking stick, which was often replaced by a broom, to help them travel.
- 8) It was once believed black cats protected the powers of witches.
- 9) Harry Houdini (1874-1926), one of the most famous and mysterious magicians, died in 1926 on Halloween night after suffering from an appendicitis that occurred after he suffered three stomach punches.
- 10) Halloween has several different names: All Hallows’ Eve, Witches Night, Lamswool Snap-Apple Night, Samhaim and Summer’s End.
October 10, 2014
Halloween sadism a myth, expert says
10-10-2014 National:
Who would be so devious as to poison candy for random children?
No one, said Joel Best, who has studied the myth of Halloween sadism for decades. Or at least, Best said he has not found anyone yet.
Best is a professor of sociology and criminal justice at the University of Delaware as well as the expert on Halloween sadism.
About 30 years ago, Best said he thought about focusing his work on deviant behavior. So what better to research than those who would wish harm to children on a cherished childhood day.
Best reviewed press coverage of such incidents from 1958-84. The findings?
“I couldn’t find a single case of a child who was killed or seriously injured by the contaminated treat picked up in the course of trick-or-treating,” he said.
Best said he could find stories stating a child here or there was harmed by a poisoned or drugged cheat. But every incident came back with a different explanation. In one case, for example, a child was poisoned by his own father.
“You cannot prove a negative, but I have been looking for this now going back 54 years,” Best said.
So how did the idea of children being poisoned on Halloween begin?
Best said the earliest tales he could find revolved around rumblings of people putting pennies on a skillet and dropping the hot coins on the outstretched hands of children.
The story picked up steam during the 1960s and 1970s as the drug culture came into play and people became more concerned with child abuse, Best said. The concern spiked in 1982 after seven people died from cyanide-laced Tylenol.
“People started speculating that there would be a lot of copycat crimes,” Best said.
But the copycats did not happen, Best said.
Best said he does see any problem with parents checking treats.
“This is a great thing to be afraid of because here’s somebody that’s so crazy that he kills little children at random, but he only does it one night a year,” Best said. “So you can get up at the breakfast table on Nov. 1 and look around and count noses and say, ‘Shoo, we made it through another year.’”
Best joked that he’s not even sure his wife did not check the Halloween goodies for their children.
“My attitude was that I resolutely never inspected my kids’ treats because I figured if you’re willing to tell people, you’d better believe it,” he said. “But I’m not convinced that my wife didn’t do it.” ..Source.. by Eric Pfahler
October 9, 2014
Outgrowing Halloween is kind of sad
10-9-2014 National:
What are you going as? If you have an answer to that question, you are either a child or an adult who never outgrew Halloween. I, sadly, have outgrown Halloween.
##I remember how exciting the holiday was in my childhood. My friends and I talked endlessly throughout October about what we were going as. It was second only to Christmas as the highlight of a child’s life, and I found it appalling that so many adults didn’t care about dressing up for Halloween.
##How could anyone not be excited about getting free candy simply for dressing up as a ghost or whatever and knocking on doors? What a great racket. Why didn’t we do this every month and have a steady supply of free candy? Then we could spend our allowances on something much more important, like comic books.
##I am the oldest of five kids, so the first few years of trick-or-treating it was just Dad taking my brother and me around while the younger kids stayed home with Mom. Those were the best years. When my sister and brothers got old enough to tag along, I had mostly cycled out of the Halloween stage.
##If you grew up in the late ’60s to ’70s, you remember the plastic masks that were bound to your head with a thin, gray piece of rubber. Remember trying to breathe out the tiny hole that never quite matched up to your mouth? Your breath bounced back against your face, causing condensation? If the rubber piece, which always got tangled in my hair, hadn’t busted by that time anyway, the mask came off once it started making me sweat.
##We rarely ventured out of our neighborhood. We lived in the house my grandfather built and that my father was born in August 1939. My brother and I had some of the same teachers he had in elementary school. Everyone knew our grandparents, both sets, because they all lived in the same homes for decades. When my paternal grandparents retired to Florida, we moved into their house. When we moved to Georgia, my uncle and his family moved into the house.
##Not long after we moved to Georgia, a St. Louis boy died on Halloween after eating pixie sticks laced with cyanide. The poisoning threw quite a scare into the holiday until police arrested the boy’s own father, who had killed him as part of an insurance scheme. He was convicted and executed, which is as it should be.
##Every year, someone brings up razor blades in apples. Who still hands out apples? Someone who wants their yard TP’d, I guess. Hospitals used to X-ray candy, but I don’t think they do that anymore. I remember having to wait patiently for Mom to go through our candy bag to make sure nothing had been tampered with.
##Years later, when I had my own goblins, I did the same thing with their candy and realized Mom was using that as an excuse to steal chocolate. So did I; it was a great scam for moms. I never understood why anyone would hand out anything other than chocolate.
##When I was in school, we had two room mothers for each class. Those room mothers provided snacks and parties for each holiday. We got candy at school during the Halloween party and then more when we went trick-or-treating that night. It was awesome. Other mothers brought in cupcakes or cakes for their children’s birthdays.
##Schools aren’t allowed to have Halloween or Christmas parties and no one is allowed to bring food in from the outside because of allergies. I always wonder how food allergies got to be such a big deal in the ’90s and beyond but were never mentioned when I was in school. Kids are really missing out these days.
##I guess those kids don’t go out trick-or-treating, either, or get to visit any other kid’s home or have dinner anywhere except with their parents. Food allergies are as good a reason as any, I suppose, for not getting caught up in the Halloween spirit. Who wants to fool with costumes anyway? It also makes the transition from dressing up to not dressing up a lot easier.
##I wish I could say I miss Halloween, but I don’t. We live in the woods, off the street where passers-by can’t even see our house. We don’t decorate for Halloween and no one makes the long trek down our dark driveway to get a few pieces of candy. As far as I am concerned, all the orange and black in the stores clash with the red and green of Christmas.
##At some point, I guess everyone outgrows Halloween. ..Source.. by Kathy Jefcoats
August 30, 2014
Federal Cybersecurity Director Found Guilty on Child Porn Charges
It is amazing that a man with his obvious background knowledge of the Internet actually believed that the Tor network could protect his activities. Clearly he needs serious help with his addiction.8-30-2014 National:
As the acting cybersecurity chief of a federal agency, Timothy DeFoggi should have been well versed in the digital footprints users leave behind online when they visit web sites and download images.
But DeFoggi—convicted today in Nebraska on three child porn charges including conspiracy to solicit and distribute child porn—must have believed his use of the Tor anonymizing network shielded him from federal investigators.
He’s the sixth suspect to make this mistake in Operation Torpedo, an FBI operation that targeted three Tor-based child porn sites and that used controversial methods to unmask anonymized users.
But DeFoggi’s conviction is perhaps more surprising than others owing to the fact that he worked at one time as the acting cybersecurity director of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. DeFoggi worked for the department from 2008 until January this year.
A department official told Business Insider that DeFoggi worked in the office of the assistant secretary for administration as lead IT specialist but a government budget document for the department from this year (.pdf) identifies a Tim DeFoggi as head of OS IT security operations, reporting to the department’s chief information security officer.
The porn sites he’s accused of using—including one called PedoBook—were hosted on servers in Nebraska and run by Aaron McGrath, who has already been convicted for his role in the sites. The sites operated as Tor hidden services—sites that have special .onion URLs and that cannot normally be traced to the physical location where they are hosted.
Although anyone could use the sites, registered users like DeFoggi—who was known online under the user names “fuckchrist” and “PTasseater”—could set up profile pages with an avatar, often child porn images, and personal information and upload files. The site archived more than 100 videos and more than 17,000 child porn and child erotica images, many of them depicting infants and toddlers being sexually abused by adults. ..Continued.. by Kim Zetter
July 31, 2014
Sex Offender Registry Insanity
Writing at Reason’s Hit & Run blog, Lenore Skenazy passes along the story of a man caught up in a particular bizarre application of the laws requiring people register as sex offenders:
See original for underlying story...
As it turns out, failure to properly register is itself considered a sex crime under the applicable law, so this guy is now in danger of having the time he must be on the sex offender registry lengthened not because he committed a sexual assault but because he failed to comply with an essentially bureaucratic requirement. Leaving aside the others issues that this case raises, that fact alone is a fairly concise demonstration of how sex offender registry laws, which were originally passed with the salutory intention of warning law enforcement and the general public of people with dangerous sex-related offenses, especially those related to children, in their backgrounds have become, for lack of a better word, perverted. As time has gone on, the laws themselves have been amended to expand the offenses that cause someone to be required to register.
Additionally, the fact that the lists are public has led to a whole host of negative consequences for people who have been convicted of a crime and served their time, including cases where offenders have found it impossible to even find someplace to live. In this case, that portion of the law designed to ensure that someone keeps their address up to date seems to be being enforced in a way that is both overly bureaucratic and, in the end, designed to create the kind of incentives that would lead someone to fail to comply with the law to begin with.
Beyond those issues, though, there’s the entire question of why Gravens is on the sex offender registry to begin with. Assuming for the sake of argument that the circumstances of the act that led to his conviction and registration requirements are accurate, it strikes me that there was an obvious overreaction here. For one thing, the fact that he was only 12 years old at the time that this happened, and had a history of sexual abuse in his own past, argues strongly that there ought to have been some kind of mitigation in his favor that would have either reduced the charges against him or eliminated them altogether.
Indeed, given the well-documented connection between children who have already been abused themselves who then turn around and engage in behavior with other children that may be considered abusive would seem to be enough in and of itself to argue that his case should have been treated differently than it apparently was. None of this is to downplay the seriousness of sexual abuse, of course, and there may be facts about his case that we don’t know, but based on the description provided in the linked article it seems inconceivable to me that he would end up covered by a law originally intended to alert the authorities and parents to the presence of an adult sexual offender in their communities. ..Source.. by Doug Mataconis
July 16, 2014
Are Child Sex-Robots Inevitable?
With every new technology comes a way to use that technology for sex. Porn dominated the early Internet. Smartphones became the mailing service for scandalous selfies. Google Glass has already been used to make (and watch) an immersive XXX film starring that James Deen.
So, it’s not surprising that when academics get together to talk about robots, their potential erotic use comes up. Rosie won’t just be doing the Jetsons’ housework, wrote a business professor and a futurist a couple years back, she’ll be working the corner as a robot prostitute.
They argued robot sex workers would eliminate human exploitation, ensure a disease-free experience (as long as the robots were hosed down after), and could be enjoyed in places where prostitution is illegal. It may sound weird, but think about the intimate relationship you have with your iPhone. You’ve taken it to bed multiple times already; imagine if Siri could actually massage you.
“We’ve had sex toys for as long as mankind, and womankind, have been around,” said Ron Arkin, Georgia Tech’s Mobile Robot Lab director, while speaking on a robot ethics panel at Berkeley on Friday. “But how will we deal with robot intimacy? Will we consider it beastiality? Could we use it to treat sex offenders?”
Once we start creating sex-robots, what will be the limits we put on them? It’s not a human being so you should theoretically be able to rock your human-like Rumba however you want, but there may be some situations that create moral panics even if the Cylon-victim involved is just a bundle of algorithms and plastic.
I asked the panel how society would deal ethically and legally with a hypothetical company that starts producing child sex-robots to satisfy deviant sexual desires. ..Continued.. by Kashmir Hill, Forbes Staff
May 20, 2014
Impact 2014, Correctional Ministry Summit
A major topic the past few years has been the role of churches in regard to someone with a sex offense attending a particular congregation. Some denominations have developed policies in this regard. There are still thoughts and concerns on how a church can show a welcoming and reconciliatory hand to a person on the registry or with a previous charge.
An associate of ours, Bob Van Domelen of Broken Yoke Ministries in DePere, WI, is taking on this issue head on with a workshop on May 30 called Sex Offenders in Our Churches. His talk is part of Impact 2014, Correctional Ministry Summit at the Billy Graham Center ..Continued.. by CURE-SORT
May 9, 2014
Nicole Pittman is now with the National Council on Crime and Delinquency
Just to let readers know, Nicole Pittman is now with the National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
The National Council on Crime and Delinquency (NCCD) is pleased to announce that Nicole Pittman, a national expert on the application of sex offender registration, has been awarded a three-year Stoneleigh Fellowship to be carried out at NCCD....
Ms. Pittman has spent the past 10 years doing groundbreaking work on the issue of sex offender registration. As a Soros Senior Justice Advocacy Fellow at Human Rights Watch, she interviewed hundreds of youth sex offenders across 20 states to document the abuses that stem from subjecting children to sex offender registration laws. The 2013 Human Rights Watch report "Raised on the Registry" based on Ms. Pittman’s findings, is the most comprehensive examination of registry laws’ impact on juvenile sex offenders.
Ms. Pittman worked for seven years at the Defender Association of Philadelphia as a specialist attorney on juvenile justice policy and has focused in recent years on reforming policymakers’ and defense attorneys’ approaches to juveniles accused of sex offenses. In 2011, she wrote a reference guide on sex offender laws applied to children titled "A Snapshot of Juvenile Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws: A Survey of the United States."
At NCCD, Ms. Pittman will continue her work through the creation of an expert advisory body and the development of an online resource center to improve responses to child sexual offending behavior in the child welfare, juvenile justice, education, and criminal justice systems. Ms. Pittman is a graduate of Tulane Law School and Duke University.







