Showing posts with label (Jessicas Law - CA Supreme Court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label (Jessicas Law - CA Supreme Court. Show all posts

January 30, 2010

Runner Defends Jessica's Law As Supreme Court Rules To Hear Sex Offender's Case

1-30-2010 California:

Author of landmark sex offender law says ‘challenge to sex predator law is without merit'

Sen. George Runner (R-Antelope Valley) released the following statements in response to the California Supreme Court's ruling yesterday to hear a challenge to Jessica's Law. 2006's landmark sex offender law, was passed by 70 percent of California voters:

"The best interests of convicted child rapists and other sexual predators cannot be elevated above the rights of their victims and the legitimate responsibility of the state to protect our children."

Responding to a case brought to the Supreme Court by Richard McKee, convicted of molesting two girls ages 11 and eight, Runner said:

"McKee, like most sexually violent predators, had been committed to a mental facility for treatment following a trial in which 12 jurors unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt found that McKee had a diagnosed mental illness which made it likely that he would re-offend and sexually molest children if given the chance.

"McKee claims that his indefinite civil commitment to a mental hospital violates his federal constitutional rights, but has offered no cases to support his argument. Most significantly, McKee has not claimed he has been cured or that his mental "abnormality no longer causes him to be a threat to others" as required by state law. McKee, who has been diagnosed as having pedophilia and a schizoaffective disorder, simply claims that the state has to reenact very expensive jury trials every two years to prove that he is still a violent sexual predator even if he has refused treatment (as most sexual predators do) or has shown no signs of progress.

"Child rapists like McKee already have more than ample procedural rights under the law. California (unlike some states) requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt before a person may be declared a "violent sexual predator" and civilly committed to a mental hospital. In addition, the California Department of Mental Health must petition the court to release persons whose condition has "so changed that the person no longer meets the definition of sexually violent predator." Moreover, McKee himself can petition the court each year if he believes his condition has changed.

"Instead of trying to prove he is no longer a threat because his condition has improved, McKee has a history of refusing medication and denying that he molested children. There is simply no rational reason to assume that a diagnosed pedophile like McKee will be cured by watching TV in a mental institution."

Runner also commented on a second challenge to Jessica's Law regarding prohibiting sexual offenders from living near schools. This case relates to a very narrow group of sex offenders who had served their sentences before voters approved Jessica's Law and was not, according to Runner, likely to impact future application of the law. ..Source..

Read More of Article...

January 29, 2010

State Supreme Court Decision Expected Monday On Homeless Sex Offenders

1-29-2010 California:

Homeless sex offenders in San Francisco will find out whether they'll be able to finally move indoors on Monday. The state Supreme Court will issue its decision about the constitutionality of the Jessica's Law restrictions banning sex offenders from living 2,000 feet from a school or park -- which, in San Francisco, have forced nearly all paroled sex offenders into homelessness.

SF Weekly ran a cover story about the conundrum last month: Sex offenders paroled to the city after voters passed Jessica's Law in November 2006 must live in enforced homelessness because there are virtually no areas in the dense city that are compliant with the restrictions.

San Francisco attorney Ernest Galvan filed suit against the law on behalf of four sex offenders, arguing the unconstitutionality of forcing people onto the streets. He charged that the foot restrictions were a violation of the ex post facto statute that a person can't be retroactively punished by law that wasn't on the books when he or she committed the crime.

All of Galvan's defendants committed their crimes before the passage of Jessica's Law, and were paroled for other non-sex-related crimes. But their sex offender status came back to haunt them: Since the people were released after voters approved Jessica's Law, they must abide by its foot restrictions on where they can live. Currently only the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is enforcing the law's foot restrictions for parolees. The San Francisco Police Department does not enforce it on registered sex offenders who have been released from parole.

Monday's likely decision will be the second in less than a week on challenges to Jessica's Law. In a separate ruling Thursday, the court questioned the constitutionality of the law's provision permitting the state to commit prisoners deemed sexually violent predators to a state mental hospital for an indefinite stay after their release from prison.

Prior to the enactment of Jessica's Law, sexually violent predators could only be confined to the hospital for two two-year terms following their prison sentence -- and only if the state could prove in court the convicts are still a danger to society. Now the person must stay in the hospital until it can be proven he or she no longer meets the definition of a sexually violent predator. The state supreme court remanded that case back to a San Diego Superior Court judge. ..Source.. Lauren Smiley

Read More of Article...

November 3, 2009

CA- Calif. high court hears arguments on Jessica's Law

Supreme Court Briefs For Cases To Be Argued on November 3 & 4, 2009

11-3-2009 California:

The California Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday in a case filed by four registered sex offenders who claim they were forced into homelessness by Jessica's Law.

That voter-approved measure bans them from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park.

The hearing will help justices rule on the residency requirements of Proposition 83, the Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act passed in 2006.

The law mandates all registered sex offenders paroled after November 8, 2006 — when the law took effect — to comply with the 2,000-foot rule or risk having parole revoked and a new prison term.

However, the law does not apply to all of state's registered sex offenders, such as Phillip Garrido, who is accused of the kidnap and rape of Jaycee Lee Dugard. His parole in an earlier rape case predated the law by more than a decade.

The four plaintiffs argue the court should throw out Jessica's Law's residency requirement because it violates their constitutional rights by making the parole terms unreasonable by taking the state's major cities off-limits.

The plaintiffs were all convicted of sex-related crimes such as rape or indecent exposure, served their time, and were paroled before Jessica's Law passed. But they all fell under the law's residency restrictions because they were each convicted and paroled for separate, non-sex crimes after the measure's passage.

Even though their post-2006 parole terms were not for a sex-related crime, they were already registered sex offenders, which put them under the Jessica's Law umbrella.

The offenders' attorneys argue these requirements force their clients to "make an unlawful and unconscionable choice between leaving their home or residence, becoming homeless or violating a newly added condition of parole."

Further, the offenders argue they and all others in their situation are denied timely transfers to another county after being unable to find a new place in their home counties.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the state Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation are defending Jessica's Law, saying it does what it was designed to do: protect children from sex offenders.

Lawyers for the state argue that the plaintiffs' attorneys are asking for too much by asking for the residency requirement to be eliminated for all registered sex offenders covered under Jessica's Law.

"The challenge must fail," they argue in court documents. "The residency restriction is designed to protect children, not to punish the offender." ..Source.. by JASON DEAREN

Read More of Article...

October 26, 2009

CA- California State Supreme Court to Determine Constitutionality of Requiring Registered Sex Offenders to Live Far from Children – Part 1

10-26-2009 California:

On November 3, 2009, the California Supreme Court will hear a case that will affect thousands of paroled sex offenders who are forbidden by Jessica’s Law from living within 2,000 feet of places children regularly gather.

The law, since its implementation in November 2006, has made as many as 1,300 sex offenders homeless. This situation, some say, makes them more likely to commit new crimes.

The petitioners are seeking to have the law found as unconstitutional because “[a]lmost every residential neighborhood in the cities in which Petitioners live is off limits,” attorneys from the Prison Law Office in Berkeley and Rosen, Bien & Galvan in San Francisco wrote in a brief for the parolees.

Thus, the petitioners challenging the law argue that Jessica’s law “creates an unlawful choice between homelessness and violating parole.”

The attorneys at Wallin & Klarich will be waiting for the outcome of this case. If the law is found unconstitutional, several parolees will have the ability to find housing but will need to do so without violating parole.

If you or someone you know was accused of a Sex Crime in California and subject to Jessica’s Law, they need the legal counsel and representation of an experienced California Sex Crime defense attorney who will be following all developments in Jessica’s Law. Wallin & Klarich has been aggressively defending the constitutional rights those accused of crimes in California for over 30 years. With offices throughout the state of California, our lawyers can provide you efficient assistance. Call us 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, at 877-230-1528.

Stayed tuned for the next post regarding Jessica’s Law. ..Source.. by Sex Crime Defense Attorney

Read More of Article...