Showing posts with label Registry - Crimes Obscured. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Registry - Crimes Obscured. Show all posts

January 31, 2010

Sex offender registry fails to show crime details

Now the public wants -crime novels- to read in their quiet moments. I would object to this vehemently because somewhere the victim will be reliving the crime and her neighbors will know all these dirty little secrets, which will not help victims.
1-31-2010 Connecticut:

Changes to the state’s sexual offender registry have made it easier for residents to locate the 5,076 registered offenders living, working or attending school in the state.

And while a click of a mouse can expose offenders by neighborhood, residents and legislators still wonder if the lack of more detailed information about an offense has lumped pedophiles in with someone who, for example, touched another person inappropriately.

Last year, Dianne Slopak, of Norwich, raised concerns about her granddaughter walking to the Wequonnoc Elementary School in Taftville, where 12 people listed on the sex offender registry live.

She said the number of offenders living in Taftville, and the 90 total registered in Norwich as of Jan. 5, seems to be “disproportionate,” and by itself a cause for concern. But she admits it is hard to decipher from the Web site if it’s the next door neighbor or someone a mile up the road she should be more worried about.

“I have three grandchildren in the Norwich school system. Two are girls,” she said. “I worry about all three.”

Provisions to include more detailed information on the state’s registry are in limbo as the state Legislature, facing a budget crisis, figures out a way to implement the mandates set forth in the 2006 Adam Walsh Child Protection Act. Among its many requirements, the act mandates that states set up uniform registry rules. It would create a three-tier classification system for sex offenders based on the offense committed and a national database to keep better track of the movement of offenders.

Web site upgrades

The latest updates to Connecticut’s sex offender registry, made in October, include a new mapping feature that allows a user to pinpoint offenders in their neighborhood and also allows users to sign up for e-mail notifications. The site had more than 11 million hits in 2009 and since the changes were implemented in October, 1,965 people have signed up for e-mail alerts.

The Norwich school system is one of those on the e-mail list and receives notification whenever someone moves in or out of the area of one of the city’s schools. Interim Superintendent Abby
Dolliver said she recently discussed with a school policy committee guidelines for offenders who have children enrolled in the district and what kind of access to the schools they should have.

“We’re tackling what kind of guidelines we want to have in place — respecting the fact they are parents,” she said.

Privacy versus safety

It’s a balancing act between their right to privacy and the overwhelming concern over the safety of students, Dolliver said.

State police Sgt. Joseph Biela, head of the sex offender unit, said phase two of the registry upgrades will include improved search function. But it will not yet include a summary of an offense.

For the past several years, prosecutors have been reading into the court record at sentencing a summary of a crime that includes whether it was consensual sex, force was used, whether it involved a male or female or how old the victim was. The information has not made it to the registry.

“The database is ready for those changes,” Biela said.

Law unworkable

State Rep. Michael Lawlor, D-East Haven, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said the Adam Walsh Act is viewed nationally as unworkable, is unfunded and clashes in some cases with existing state laws.

Even the measures the state has agreed on cannot be implemented without more money and the resources to do it.

“As a public policy matter, it would be a great thing to have,” Lawlor said of adding more information to the Web site.

“These are the basic things people want to know,” he said. “Right now it’s hard to sort out. A lot of these guys are not pedophiles. But people trying to find out more information can’t easily.

“If you’re going to put somebody online, give people something to work with. Focus on the high-risk offenders, the people who may be dangerous.”

Focus on risk

In the absence of a full description of the crime, the state has placed a link to state statute, which provides a general description of the crime.

“The name of the crime is not always indicative of what they did,” Lawlor said.
Senior Assistant State’s Attorney Theresa Anne Ferryman, who handles sexual abuse cases involving children in New London County, agrees that in working to secure a conviction, changes to the criminal charge are common.

“We all know there are people on the registry where the public’s concerns doesn’t always fit the crime,” she said. “And then there are cases that are weak enough that we end up with charges that don’t reflect the gravity of the offense.”

Ferryman said offenders realize the gravity of being placed on the registry, which in many cases is dictated by statute.

“They’re willing to go to jail. They’re willing to plead guilty. They don’t want to register,” Ferryman said. “Nobody wants to register. It’s the stigma.” ..Source.. GREG SMITH, Norwich Bulletin

Read More of Article...

November 10, 2009

MI- Editorial: Sex Offender Registry: Too broad a list

11-10-2009 Michigan:

by Muskegon Chronicle


Lawmakers need to review the rules that put names on the list

The Michigan Court of Appeals’ precedent-setting decision to remove a Muskegon man’s name from the state’s Public Sex Offender Registry was the right one.

And we urge the state Legislature to follow up with a careful review of the sex registry and who should be on it.

Robert Lee Dipiazza was convicted in 2004 under the Holmes Youthful Trainee Act, which allows the dismissal of cases against young first offenders if they successfully complete probation. Youthful offenders’ court files also are suppressed to establish a clean record and give them a second chance.

Dipiazza, who was convicted of having consensual sex with his underage girlfriend who is now his wife, followed all the rules. So, his court files were suppressed, but his name remained on the sex offender list.

The sex registry is on the Internet and any employer can check that list. Unfortunately for Dipiazza, because his court files had been suppressed, employers couldn’t check them out to confirm his story that he was not a pedophile or a rapist.

Dipiazza claimed in his court case that because his name is on the registry he has been unable to find work and actually lost two jobs because his employers discovered his name on the list.

Since Oct. 1 2004, no one convicted under the Youthful Trainee Act has been listed on the sex registry. But the names of all the people convicted under the act before that date remained. If Dipiazza’s case had been handled 32 days later, his name never would have shown up on the registry.

“I think it’s a very important ruling,” Miriam Aukerman, who argued the case, told The Chronicle. “It’s kind of a wake-up call, because the registry has become so overbroad. ... I think it’s a signal to the Legislature to really think about who needs to be on the registry and who doesn’t.”

The intention of the Sex Offender Registry, which was placed on the Internet in 1999, to alert neighbors, employers and others of “potential serious menace and danger to the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the people and particularly children,” was never an issue in Dipiazza’s case. There was never a reason to believe he was a danger to the public.

Having his name and others like him on the list just makes it more difficult to keep track of the most dangerous offenders. In fact, there are 10 photos on the information site right now of convicted sex offenders living in the state who have not complied with the law. The last reported address for one, Terry Lee Salazar, was Hart.

To show how difficult following up on sex offenders can be, neighboring Ohio is dealing with the aftermath of the alleged murders of at least 11 women by a registered sex offender who regularly checked in with the sheriff’s department. He was released from prison in 2005 after serving 15 years on a charge of attempted rape. He was arrested last week and charged with five murders.

More than 44,700 names are on the Michigan Sex Offender Registry. About 16 percent were not in compliance with the registry law.

Actually 16% is incorrect, statistics released a few days ago by the Michigan State Police show 4,315 out of compliance out of 45,164 which is 9.5% (see last entry in chart). Further, out of compliance includes those IN PRISON who have no reason to comply with the registry, to them it is a non-issue until they are released.

That’s a lot of checking by parole officers and police.

Lawmakers need to review the list requirements now. ..Source..

Read More of Article...

January 5, 2009

IL- Offenders among us

1-5-2009 Illinois:

Past sins listed, not explained,in sex registries

I pastor a church in the cozy town of Omaha, Ill. A friend here recently confided in me that a number of people are concerned that a "child molester" has been attending my church. He asked if that is really true. Then he said, "This has been a big dark cloud hanging over your entire operation there."

Well, the guy was no "child molester." (And even if he had been, it would be irrelevant.) Over 15 years ago, as a stupid 20-year-old, he flashed a couple of minors, and he paid dearly. He admits he was wrong. But he now has a wife, a son, a good job and is one of the finest Christian men I know. I have five children, and I trust him with them. Unfortunately, a person can get labeled as a "sex offender" whether he urinated in public, physically assaulted someone or did something in between. But when the state requires a person to register, everyone assumes the worst. I never heard anyone say, "A sex offender moved into town. I hope he doesn't pee outside!"

I do understand the desire to have an online registry. While I have known the guy for years, I don't know those other guys.

Perhaps we should even expand the Internet registry. Then we could be even better protected. Before letting customers in your store, check the thief registry to ensure they never shoplifted as teenagers. Consult the marijuana registry to guarantee your baby sitter never smoked dope 20 years ago.

Are some sins worse than others? Display everyone's sins online and let readers decide for themselves.

It could expand even further. Screen potential dates through an online adultery database. Screen potential employees and friends through an online liar registry and gossip database.

If we create Internet registries to expose everyone with skeletons in their closets, those registries will contain everyone in your phone book. Everyone has the potential to hurt us.

If someone commits a heinous crime and is a danger to society, we have options such as execution and life in prison.

But it is nonsense to tell a person he is "free" to live normally in society, while broadcasting his past sins on the Internet.

If we must have registries, we need to include everyone's sins, not just a select few.

Repentance and forgiveness are what Christianity is all about. So after my friend informed me about the "big dark cloud" that has been hanging over my church, I responded something like this: "If you know any repentant murderers, adulterers, child-molesters, drunks, wife-beaters, liars, thieves or gossips who need Jesus, you send them to me. I'll gladly give them a warm welcome!"

Paul was a murderer, Peter denied Christ, King David was an adulterer and a murderer, and Solomon had lust issues. Yet God worked wonders through them, wouldn't you agree?

How many of your past sins do you want others to see online?

How much grace and forgiveness do you yourself wish to receive? ..News Source.. Opinion of: Joseph Gleason

Read More of Article...

July 26, 2008

MI- Offender List Unfair?

7-26-2008 Michigan:

(WXYZ) - A local woman says she was wrongly convicted of groping a fellow college student. Even though a Judge expunged the conviction she can't keep a job because she still has to register as a sex offender. So, do some people really deserve to be on a list full of child predators and rapists?


..News Source.. by WXYZ

Read More of Article...