Showing posts with label Computer - e-mail - Addresses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Computer - e-mail - Addresses. Show all posts

February 3, 2011

Bill to require sex offenders to register computers, e-mails advances through Ark. committee

Does this really imply or suggest that, cybercrimes are ONLY committed by former sex offenders? What about all other criminal types?
2-3-2011 Arkansas:

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — A bill to require sex offenders register their e-mail addresses, user names and computers has passed out of an Arkansas legislative committee and goes to the state House for a vote.

The bill by Democratic Rep. Tiffany Rogers of Stuttgart cleared the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday. It would require sex offenders subject to lifetime registration to report all e-mail addresses, user names and screen names, in addition to computers and Internet-ready devices they have access to.

Those sex offenders would have to report changes to their technological information every six months.

Rogers says the bill adapts current law to reflect technological advances.

The state attorney general backed Rogers' proposal as a means to strengthen the fight against cybercrimes. ..Source.. KSPR.com

Read More of Article...

August 30, 2010

Cordray Announces New Efforts to Track Sex Offenders

First notice the micro management of the lives of registrants. i.e. e-mail addresses and phone numbers. Of course this new system of tracking likely will catch offenders unaware and maybe arrested, when they are actually compliant. For instance, if a phone is shut off because one cannot pay a bill, that would cause the registrant to be arrested. Next, if the registrant doesn't use his/her e-mail addresses frequently, the e-mail provider will tag them for being dormant and eventually close the e-mail address, causing the registrant to be arrested. Next, if a registrant has many e-mail addresses each for different purposes, will s/he be arrested because he decides to no longer use one of them? There is a big difference in having a e-mail address and using it, this new system forces registrants to use ALL e-mail addresses regularly or face arrest. Insanity in law!
8-30-2010 Ohio:

(COLUMBUS, Ohio) – Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray announced today that his office has received a federal grant that will help county sheriffs keep better track of registered sex offenders.

The $155,546 grant will pay for two new programs.

The first will allow the Attorney General’s Office to develop a phone and e-mail alert system that will send automated messages to offenders and sheriffs’ offices around Ohio, five days before offenders are supposed to re-register as part of their reporting requirements. The system also will track phone numbers or e-mail addresses that no longer are in operation, alerting sheriffs’ offices if the contact information provided by offenders is incorrect.

“This automated system will ensure that offenders know when they must register and will help county sheriffs’ offices make sure that those offenders comply with those requirements,” Cordray said.

“Monitoring registered sex offenders is a difficult task for sheriffs’ offices, especially those that have had to make staffing cutbacks," said Coshocton County Sheriff Timothy Rogers, president of the Buckeye State Sheriffs Association. "This new callback system will help our sheriffs better keep track of offenders, especially those who do not comply with their registration requirements, and we thank Attorney General Cordray for his support.”

The second part of the grant will help county sheriffs’ offices fund extradition of offenders who moved to other states without notifying local authorities as required by law.

The grant will fund extradition of up to 50 of the most serious sex offenders, which will allow them to be prosecuted in state courts.
Why are local courts wanting to prosecute these cases, when the offense is a federal offense? AWA has a built-in jurisdictional hook to make this circumstance a federal offense. Should anyone see why a local prosecutor would want to prosecute these cases rather than allowing federal courts to do so, please send me a e-mail. eAdvocate
“Too often noncompliant offenders avoid prosecution simply because smaller counties cannot afford the overtime and travel expenses needed to pick them up. This grant will help address this problem.” Cordray said.

The grant money was awarded by the federal Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering and Tracking and the Adam Walsh Act Implementation Grant Program, which is part of the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs.

In 2009, Ohio became the first state in the nation to reach substantial implementation of the federal Adam Walsh Act. ..Source.. Ohio Attorney General's Office

Read More of Article...

August 25, 2009

GA- Judge mulls law on sex offender online obligations

This violates the 4th Amendment without any question in this writers mind. The state has no right or grounds -without probable cause that a crime has been, or is in the progress of being committed- to anything personal found within registrants' home without a warrant. There is no -fishing expedition- exception in the 4th amendment!

8-25-2009 Georgia:

ATLANTA -- A federal judge on Tuesday began weighing arguments for and against a new Georgia law that requires sex offenders to hand over Internet passwords, screen names and e-mail addresses to law enforcement officials in the name of public safety.

Attorneys for convicted sex offender Terrence White urged U.S. District Judge Bill Duffey to block the law because it infringes on White's constitutional rights. State attorneys countered that the 2009 law gives authorities a much-needed tool to make sure registered sex offenders don't strike again.

Duffey did not rule immediately, but he said the case centers on a "fundamental issue in our culture."

"Children do have to be protected, but that also has to be balanced with constitutional protections," he said. "And I never take those lightly."

The case hinges on a state statute that took effect in January, bringing Georgia in line with a 2006 federal law requiring authorities to track Internet addresses of sex offenders.

It also made Georgia one of the first states to take the extra step of forcing its 16,000 offenders to turn in their passwords as well.

A similar law in Utah was struck down in September on grounds that it violated the privacy rights of an offender who challenged it. Lawmakers there last week amended the registry, requiring state officials to only use the online information to investigate sex crimes.

White, who is challenging the law in Georgia, was convicted in 1986 of enticing a child for indecent purposes. His attorney, Nicole Iannarone, contended that the law is written so broadly that it could allow authorities access to his online retail accounts, bank information and anything else considered "interactive online forums."

She argued that an overzealous sheriff could charge her client or another sex offender with violating the registry's rules if he or she refuses to turn in their Delta.com account information.

"The statute is over-broad, and it doesn't have anything to do with the mission of protecting children."

State attorney Paige Boorman, however, countered that the measure "is relevant and necessary to protect the public." She said online screen names and passwords are "tools for law enforcement" that will make it easier for them to investigate and prevent another sex crime before it's too late.

Duffey peppered both attorneys with questions, but focused on the balance between public safety and free speech. The addresses of sex offenders in Georgia are already posted online to alert neighbors to their whereabouts, the judge said.

"I'm not aware of a fundamental right to live somewhere anonymously," Iannarone replied. "It is a fundamental right to speak anonymously." ..Source.. by GREG BLUESTEIN



GA- Judge Weighing Sex Offender Law

8-25-2009 Georgia:

ATLANTA (AP) Attorneys for a convicted sex offender are urging a federal judge to block a new Georgia law that requires sex offenders to hand over Internet passwords, screen names and e-mail addresses to law enforcement officials.

Attorneys for Terrence White told the judge Tuesday the law is too broad and infringes on White's constitutional rights.

State attorneys say the new requirements give authorities another tool to keep registered sex offenders from striking again.

The law took effect in January and made Georgia one of a small band of states complying with guidelines in a 2006 federal law requiring authorities to track Internet addresses of sex offenders.

But the state is among the first to take the extra step of forcing its 16,000 offenders to turn in their passwords as well. ..Source.. by WSBRadio.com

Read More of Article...

August 15, 2009

GA- Gwinnett Authorities Arrest Sex Offender

8-15-2009 Georgia:

GWINNETT COUNTY, Ga. (MyFOX ATLANTA) - Gwinnett County Sheriffs deputies arrested a registered sex offender Thursday after he failed to provide email addresses and passwords related to his internet activity as required by law.

Deputies learned that Douglas Elkins was on a dating site called PlentyofFish.com and he sent at least one woman sexually explicit photos of himself.

So what! It was a woman and I do believe the law permits "consenting adults" to do whatever they want, outside of public view. The public cannot view what is the bits and bytes of electronic transmissions.

Elkins was charged with failing to register as a sex offender for not providing the email addresses and passwords he was using and violation of probation.
Again, 1st and 4th amendment rights extend to folks on parole and probation, the state has no business interfering with consenting adults.

Elkins was convicted in 2002 in Gwinnett County for child molestation. ..Source.. by FOX News

Read More of Article...

August 11, 2009

IL- Quinn signs sex offender crackdown laws

Another misguided Gov. and Legislature who apparently refuse to analyze the crimes that have been committed. If they were analyzed they would find the "Predators" are folks who have never before been convicted of a sex crime, they are not former registered offenders. Myths and misconstructions drive these laws, not facts and evidence! This misguided effort will not prevent online crimes.

8-11-2009 Illinois:

SPRINGFIELD—Gov. Pat Quinn signed new laws Tuesday designed to limit sex offenders’ use of technology as a way to find more victims.

One law taking effect Jan. 1 makes it a felony for registered sex offenders to use social networking sites, a move aimed at taking another step toward shutting down an avenue of contact between an offender and victim.

“Obviously, the Internet has been more and more a mechanism for predators to reach out,” said Sen. Bill Brady (R-Bloomington), a sponsor of the measure and a governor candidate. “The idea was, if the predator is supposed to be a registered sex offender, they should keep their Internet distance as well as their physical distance. The object is to protect innocent individuals on the Internet from sex offenders.”

Quinn also signed into law a new offense known as grooming, where a predator over time coaxes a minor into meeting up for sexual activities.

The law, whose sponsors included Rep. Jack Franks (D-Marengo), is aimed at closing a loophole in the current sex registration law, he said. It takes effect immediately.

Another bill, signed on a busy day where Quinn dealt with dozens of bills, deals with child visitation rights. As of Jan. 1, the law will provide for visitation rights through electronic communication such as telephone, e-mail and instant messaging. ..Source.. by Ray Long and Monique Garcia

Read More of Article...

May 21, 2009

WV- Two men indicted on incest charges in W.Va.

The only thing important in this article is, the gentleman who was indicted for "... using a false user name on an e-mail site." While we don't know what the e-mail site was for which MAY make a difference, we do know this: The U.S. Supreme court has ruled a person is well within his rights to be on the Internet and reamin anonymous. How is that possible if one uses a real name? Further, are sex offenders now no longer permitted to file court documents using a "John Doe" name? These laws are going too far!


5-20-2009 West Virginia:

Twenty-five more people were indicted on various charges Wednesday as a Berkeley County grand jury wrapped up following two days of deliberations.

Listed among the indictments were five counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and two of sexual abuse by a parent, guardian or custodian against a 33-year-old Martinsburg man in a case involving an 11-year-old girl.

In keeping with Herald-Mail policy, the defendant’s name and that of the victim are not being published to protect the victim’s privacy.

In a similar, but unrelated case, a 27-year-old Martinsburg man was indicted on one count of sexual assault in the first degree in a case involving a 9-year-old-girl.

Four men were indicted on charges stemming from violations of the law requiring convicted sex offenders to register with the state police.

Indicted were:

• ___, 38, of 42 Crown Court, Martinsburg, one count of failure to notify of a change in residence, of employment and one of failure to report.

• ___, 57, of 13463 Apple Harvest Drive, Martinsburg, one count of felony failure to register as a sex offender and a misdemeanor count of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. According to court records, ___ was using a false user name on an e-mail site.

• ___, 29, of 33 Pit Lane, Martinsburg, one count each of failing to register with the state police as a sex offender and failure to notify police that his residence changed.

• ___, 34, of 38 Boarman Place, Martinsburg, indicted on one count of failure to register as a sex offender with the state police.

Also indicted Wednesday were:

for the rest of the article: ..News Source.. by

Read More of Article...

April 27, 2009

NC- Policing social networking for sexual predators

The problem with these laws affecting RSOs is that they have an underlying premise, that a "social networking" website is one that allows one to setup a profile and communicate with other persons, and that RSOs are the only ones who will solicit minors on those sites. Besides the fact that it makes too many assumptions, and everyone knows how to spell ass-u-me, it prohibits political and religious expression on the Internet on social networking sites. Lawmakers and religious folks have MySpace and Facebook accounts and urge folks to visit them there to learn about many things political and religious in nature, including how to vote, these laws prohibit RSOs from exercising such political and religious endeavors. These laws are over-broad and as such will be the downfall of them, but not until a good lawyer decides to attack them. Where is that lawyer?

4-27-2009 North Carolina:

Starting in May, new laws will place more restrictions on sex offenders living in North Carolina.

In Cumberland County, the Sheriff’s Office will be responsible for enforcing those laws.

One makes it illegal for a registered sex offender to use a social networking Web site accessible to minors. The second requires sex offenders to provide officers with their e-mail addresses and user IDs and is similar to federal legislation passed in late 2008.

The latter bill takes affect May 1, and Debbie Tanna, spokeswoman for the Sheriff’s Office, said the department is preparing to handle the influx of information.

Registered sex offenders who don’t comply can face penalties of a year or more in prison.

Although the new laws require offenders to provide lawmen with more information, investigators say the new data is not likely to result in more arrests.

Tanna said there’s no way to ensure offenders comply.

But the threat of jail time will be motivation enough for some.

Internet monitoring
Sgt. Greg Mills, of the department’s Special Victims Unit, said that those likely to use the Internet to prey on juveniles will probably not comply with the new laws.

He already uses the Internet to find child predators by posing as a juvenile in chat rooms and on social networking sites.

Mills, who is 48, is a teenage girl to those who frequent the Internet.

On a recent Tuesday morning, his online persona cut class and joined an online chat room. After logging in, Mills crossed his arms and sat back in his seat. Within seconds, he was bombarded by requests to chat. Most of the conversations ended abruptly when Mills said his persona’s age — 13. But within 15 minutes — and with little to no prodding — one man who identified himself as being 30 years old and from Fayetteville was asking for the measurements and sexual history of Mills’ online persona.

“I pretty much let them lead the conversation,” Mills said. “You just kind of fish.”

On Tuesday, it didn’t take him long to get a bite.

“o u looking to get into trouble huh?” the unidentified 30-year-old man typed. “so u a virgin?”

Mills has conducted similar undercover operations for the Sheriff’s Office since 2006. He said he’s been targeting predators on social networks for about two years.

“It doesn’t matter where you go to. You’re going to get hit on by somebody,” Mills said. “It’s not rocket science.”

The difficult part, he said, is keeping up with changes in Internet trends and new technologies, such as improved cell phone cameras and mobile Internet capabilities that make it harder to shield juveniles from tech-savvy predators.

“It changes constantly,” Mills said. “Staying on top of it is the hardest part.”

Rise in arrests
A national study released in March shows that as Web use has risen among youth, so have arrests of online predators.

The Internet is the new frontier for sexual predators, and legislators and lawmen have pushed for more controls to combat the problem.

Mills said the focus is typically on the better-known social networks, such as MySpace or Facebook.

But, he said, there are hundreds of others. According to the law, a social networking site is any site or service where users can make a profile and interact with others. That includes popular chat applications such as Yahoo Messenger and AOL Instant Messenger.

According to the study from the University of New Hampshire’s Crimes Against Children Research Center, more than 3,000 arrests were made in 2006 after online predators solicited undercover lawmen posing as juveniles. That compares with 644 arrests in 2000.

The study looked at nationwide arrest data related to online predators.

It found that most arrests come after predators solicit lawmen. In 2006, 615 predators were arrested for soliciting juveniles. That represented a 21 percent increase from 2000, but the study points out that over the same period, Internet usage by youth grew between 73 percent and 93 percent.

At one time, worries about sex offenders were limited to who was living in the neighborhood.

But with the Internet, law enforcement, parents and lawmakers also have to be concerned about the countless number of sex offenders who live across the world.

Keeping track
The Sheriff’s Office has two deputies who work on keeping track of sex offenders. Tanna said they have begun to put an emphasis on locating sex offenders on the Internet.

Despite the staffing challenges, Tanna said the department wasn’t looking to hire more investigators to keep pace with the extra workload.

“We have to work with what we’ve got,” she said. “We do a pretty good job.”

She said deputies are already stretched thin, especially with the department overseeing police duties in Spring Lake. If any adjustments are needed once the new laws take affect, the department will have to get creative, Tanna said.

Tanna said investigators have already found several registered offenders on social networking sites and they expect to find more once the offenders are required to submit their information.

One of the biggest challenges will be tracking down registered sex offenders who use fake identities online, Tanna said.

For that, investigators will rely on the cooperation of parents and others, Mills said.

He encouraged anyone who suspects his child is falling victim to a predator or who knows of a registered sex offender using a social networking site to notify the authorities.

“How are we going to catch these guys?” he said. “It’s going to depend on the public.”

‘A parent’s nightmare’Attorney General Roy Cooper has made it a priority to address the issue of sex offenders on the Internet, specifically those who use social networking sites frequented by youth.

Cooper said the emphasis he’s placed on the issue comes from his dual roles as chief law enforcement officer for the state and a parent of three girls, including two teens.

“It’s a parent’s nightmare to have a predator solicit a child or lure that child out of the house,” he said. “The Internet gives predators the opportunity to groom several children at the same time.”

The two largest social networking sites, Facebook and MySpace, have each taken steps to combat the abuse of their networks and supported federal legislation to help combat misuse by keeping registered sex offenders off the sites.

Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt said the steps were preventative and not in response to any problem.

“We have not yet had to handle a case of a registered sex offender meeting a minor through Facebook,” he said. “We are working hard to make sure it never happens.”

According to the University of New Hampshire study, arrests for online predators in 2006 constituted about 1percent of all arrests for sex crimes against children.

The study said there was no evidence that the Internet was fueling an epidemic of sex crimes against youth, and there was no evidence of predators using social networking sites to stalk or abduct unsuspecting victims.

Cooper said it was important for parents to be involved in their child’s Internet use.

He said that parents shouldn’t spy, but they should place the computer in a central location and develop a level of trust with their child. He also advocated the use of parental controls that are age-appropriate.

Web sites’ responses
With more than 300million users between them, representatives from Facebook and MySpace said the companies have responded to safety concerns.

MySpace has partnered with an online identity and background verification company, Sentinel Tech Holding Corp., to improve its ability to find and remove sex offenders.

“We are committed to keeping sex offenders off MySpace,” said the Web site’s chief security officer, Hemanshu Nigam, a former federal Internet crimes prosecutor and child safety advocate.

The company also has put a number of barriers in place to limit an adult’s ability to search for juveniles.

Facebook also searches for registered sex offenders and monitors its users for suspicious activity.

“Protecting our users, especially the many children who use our site has always been a top priority for Facebook,” said Schnitt. ..News Source.. by Drew Brooks, Staff writer

Read More of Article...

March 29, 2009

TX- Bill targeting online predators calls for Texas sex offenders to report e-mail addresses, numbers

Something new found in this soon to be introduced bill is, "... and to give social networking sites permission to boot them offline." Why do those sites NEED permission? Obviously there is a right involved, which the State is coercing RSO to give up. Well, as insane as this is I must remember, this is the state with the highest executions and where Bush came from.

3-29-2009 Texas:

AUSTIN – Registering as a sex offender has made it hard enough for Marc P. to have anything resembling a normal life.

The Dallas County man, who received deferred adjudication more than a decade ago for having sex with a 14-year-old when he was 18, has his address and photo on file for the world to see – not a selling point, he says, for potential employers, landlords or girlfriends.

Now, Texas lawmakers want Marc and other registered sex offenders to also report their e-mail addresses, cellphone numbers and online screen names to the state, and to give social networking sites permission to boot them offline. Unlike the information sex offenders currently must report, this data would not be available to the public.

Supporters say that will crack down on online predators and help local authorities keep track of registered sex offenders.

"The dangers children face online are very real," state Attorney General Greg Abbott said Thursday, appearing with U.S. Sen. John Cornyn and U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio, to tout new efforts to crack down on online sexual predators. "These are common-sense changes to ensure our efforts keep up with the ever-changing technology these predators are using."

But opponents say the legislation would add another layer of data to a state sex offender database that already contains too many inaccuracies. And it would make it even harder for sex offenders who have served their time to participate in modern society. To Marc, now 33, it's simply a higher price than he should have to pay for a one-time mistake.

"What's next, a chip in my brain? A scarlet letter?" asked Marc, who lives with his parents, is attending junior college and feels such a strong stigma against sex offenders that he asked that his last name not be used. "Are they going to look me up on dating Web sites? Check out my Facebook page? Now I'm going to be punished for being computer literate."

Texas' current registry requires sex offenders to report their address, birth date, height, weight and race to local authorities, and to keep an up-to-date photo on file. This information is available to the public on searchable Web sites.

The proposed bill would make it a state jail felony not to also register e-mail addresses, cellphone numbers and other online identifiers, such as screen names and social networking monikers, with the state.

The data would be provided to social networking sites like MySpace and Facebook so they could pre-screen their customers and, if they choose, refuse service to sex offenders.

The bill, sponsored by Sen. Florence Shapiro, R-Plano, and Rep. Aaron Peña, D-Edinburg, would also ban the highest-risk sex offenders on probation or parole from using the Internet to view pornography, which supporters say could be a gateway to committing sex crimes.

The bill is a response to growing concerns that sex offenders are using new technology to prey on children online – fears fueled by reality TV series like Dateline NBC's "To Catch a Predator." Abbott and Shapiro cited recent reports that there are 90,000 registered sex offenders with MySpace profiles.

"Our children, our grandchildren, they're all on the Internet," Shapiro said. "There's got to be a structure in place to prevent convicted sex offenders from being all over these sites."

State officials routinely site statistics that one in five children between 10 and 17 have received a sexual solicitation online, but a recent Harvard University study found that the overwhelming majority of these solicitations are from other teens or their peers – not adults.

Critics of the proposed expansion of the database also note that the registration system, which contains information on nearly 50,000 Texans, is already riddled with errors and omissions. A 2006 Dallas Morning News review of the registry found it was highly inaccurate: Roughly half of North Texas sex offenders could not be located, and one in six were living somewhere other than their registered addresses.

"We need to take a deliberate look at where the system is failing, as opposed to making all these little additions to it," said Annette Burrhus-Clay, executive director of the Texas Association Against Sexual Assault. "While it seems like a good idea on the surface, I'm not sure this brings us any closer to the safe communities we want to have."

If the goal is safe communities, human-rights advocates say, convicted sex offenders are far less likely to commit new crimes if they can successfully re-enter the community. Finding safe housing and a good job often requires Internet access, social networking sites and e-mail accounts – all things sex offenders may shy from if they're burdened with registration requirements.

"If we make it so that people just don't want to have online identifiers, it's going to make it even more difficult for them to conduct job searches, to respond to e-mail inquiries about housing," said Sarah Tofte, a researcher with Human Rights Watch. "It will make it next to impossible for them to try to establish some stability in their lives." ..News Source.. by EMILY RAMSHAW / The Dallas Morning News

Read More of Article...

February 6, 2009

WY- Sex offenders internet bill dies

2-6-2009 Wyoming:

CHEYENNE - A bill to restrict Internet access for convicted sex offenders died in a legislative committee Thursday.

The House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously against the bill. The committee's chairman, Rep. Keith Gingery, R-Jackson, says the bill was too flawed to go to the House floor.

Laramie County District Attorney Scott Homar says convicted sex offenders already are subject to Internet restrictions and computer searches, even if the offender's crime did not involve the Internet. ..News Source.. by BillingsGazette.com

Read More of Article...

February 3, 2009

GA- Civil disobedience: A Proper Construction

2-2-2009 Georgia:

Today a few sites are claiming "FIRST OPEN CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE BY S.O.," and citing a Georgia court case which is in progress today.

Civil disobedience is a refusal to follow some law, going to court to seek an injunction against the state enforcing a law, is not civil disobedience, nor is this the first case of a former sex offender going to court seeking an injunction against a sex offender law.

Black's law (6th Ed): "Civil disobedience: A form of lawbreaking employed to demonstrate the injustice or unfairness of a particular law and indulged in deliberately to focus attention on the allegedly undesirable law."

Note: Since the gentleman (a Georgia RSO) is seeking to proceed in court anonymously (John Doe status) and at this point does not have a lawyer, the court giving him time to find one (and the court indicating it may appoint one if the gentleman cannot find one), I will not mention his name nor give links to my sources. With that said,

The facts in essence: Georgia enacted a law requiring all of its RSOs to turn over certain information to the state as part of its registration scheme (namely passwords to all online e-mail accounts, and other things).

Following enactment of that law a Georgia RSO (The gentleman mentioned above) has gone to federal court seeking an injunction to stop the state from enforcing that law against him on his next birthday (apparently that is when the state requires him to update his registration information including anything new required by the state, hence the passwords and e-mmail addresses).

Because he presented a minimal but compelling argument and supported same with equally compelling facts, apparently the court issued a temporary injunction without objection from the state's attorney.

Next, is this the first RSO who has gone to court seeking a declaration that this type of collateral registration law is unconstitutional, NO he is not the first.

There are other similar cases (which should be presented) in different states:
Passwords
Registered Sex Offenders Must Comply with New Internet Rules
Ga. sex offenders must hand over online passwords

In each of those links are other links to the current and past court cases on this and similar issues in a few states.

Good Luck, Georgia RSO,
eAdvocate (PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO THIS GENTLEMAN, anyone)

..News Source Withheld (see above for reason)..

Read More of Article...

January 31, 2009

NM- Bill gives officers contact info of sex offenders

It never ceases to amaze me how ignorant lawmakers and law enforcement is, their heads are in the sand, they have no idea how the Internet works and are totally oblivious of the costs of today's throwaway cell phones, and have ignored land lines. Every Internet service provider has ways to eliminate spam, and any e-mail coming in can be tagged spam, e-mail addresses are a dime a dozen and can be throwaway as well, IP addresses can be dynamic and most of the major service providers use that anyway. Lawmakers and law enforcement folks seem to get a mental block when they get elected or hired, I guess it could be that reasoning is deadened by the perceived power of their position. This article displays all of these elements.

1-31-2009 New Mexico:

Keeping track of convicted sex offenders could get easier for law enforcement with the passage of a new bill.

Undersheriff Sal Bargaiola said having sex offenders' phone numbers, cell phone numbers and e-mail addresses would help big time--and they might just get the information.

The Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department and Republican State Representative Bill Rehm teamed up to introduce legislation that they hope will give detectives another tool to be able to track down and communicate with sex offenders when they move into Bernalillo County.

"We know that sex offenders go to MySpace, we know they go to Facebook, this way we'll be able to see their e-mail addresses,' Rep. Rehm said.

"What I think this bill will do is, you can switch addresses three and four times a year, you're not going to switch cell phone numbers, and you're not going to switch e-mail addresses," he said.

Under the proposed bill, the phone numbers of sex offenders would not be posted on the state's online registry. That information would be given only to law enforcement.

The sheriff's department said sex offenders who obey their registration requirements might actually prefer a checkup over the phone. Instead of a visit from armed deputies.

"I think it's better for the courts, it's better for them and it's better for us that we have more information not less," Rep. Rehm said.

Several sex offenders have called Rep. Rehm opposing the bill. But so far this session, it has received full support from lawmakers. ..News Source.. by KOB.com

Read More of Article...

December 30, 2008

GA- Ga. sex offenders must hand over online passwords

This law violates the U.S. Supreme court precedent which holds that every citizen has the right to anonymous free speech. Further, a federal court in Utah has already declared this unconstitutional. The same was held true in Indiana also by a federal court.

12-30-2008 Georgia:

Privacy advocates are questioning an aggressive Georgia law set to take effect Thursday that would require sex offenders to hand over Internet passwords, screen names and e-mail addresses.

Georgia joins a small band of states complying with guidelines in a 2006 federal law requiring authorities to track Internet addresses of sex offenders, but it is among the first to take the extra step of forcing its 16,000 offenders to turn in their passwords as well.

A federal judge ruled in September that a similar law in Utah violated the privacy rights of an offender who challenged it, though the narrow ruling only applied to one offender who had a military conviction on sex offenses but was never in Utah's court or prison system.

No one in Georgia has challenged the law yet, but critics say it threatens the privacy of sex offenders and burdens cash-strapped law enforcement officials.

"There's certainly a privacy concern," said Sara Totonchi of the Atlanta-based Southern Center for Human Rights. "This essentially will give law enforcement the ability to read e-mails between family members, between employers."

State Sen. Cecil Staton, who wrote the bill, said the measure is designed to keep the Internet safe for children. Authorities could use the passwords and other information to make sure offenders aren't stalking children online or chatting with them about off-limits topics.

--Note: An excuse to ILLEGALLY spy on registrants, children have again been used as a pretext to enact another unconstitutional law!

Staton said although the measure may violate the privacy of sex offenders, the need to protect children "outweighs a lot of the rights of these individuals."

"We limit where they can live, we make their information available on the Internet. To some degree, we do invade their privacy," said Staton, a Republican from Macon. "But the feeling is, they have forfeited, to some degree, some privacy rights."

Most states already make the addresses of sex offenders available online. Georgia is one of at least 15 states that have adopted laws requiring sex offenders to detail their e-mail addresses, user names and other Internet handles, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

But researcher Sarah Hammond said Georgia and Utah appear to be the only states that require sex offenders to also hand over their passwords.

The new requirements are far from watertight. While offenders who don't report their user names and passwords could face probation violations — and possibly a return to prison — supporters admit it isn't hard to skirt the law's requirements.

"My hunch is, where there's a will, there's a way," Staton said. "If people are intent on violating this law, there are many different ways. What's important is we have given law enforcement a tool."

For offenders like Kelly Piercy, convicted of child pornography charges in 1999, the password requirement is the latest example of "pre-emptive justice."

Piercy, who suffers from a degenerative disease that has left him blind, said he already struggles to keep track of the roughly dozen screen names he has created, and he doubts deputies would have much sympathy for him if he forgets to report one.

"I made a mistake and I need to pay for it. And I did. But now we're the target of pre-emptive justice — and that concerns me," he said. "How much further down the road can sex offenders be chased?" ..News Source.. by AP

Read More of Article...

October 15, 2008

Child predators apparently don’t use Gmail

10-15-2008 National:

A few years ago, a piece of popular legislation made its way past Illinois lawmakers (including Barack Obama, who voted in favor of it, as well as teacher unions, public health officials, etc.) offering comprehensive education to school children that, among other things, would have taught them to identify and avoid online predators. Online safety education is long overdue; when we’re providing fire safety, DARE, and “stay away from strangers” talks, it only makes sense to teach kids to be thoughtful about what they do and who they encounter online. Virginia has already instituted such a curriculum and I’m hopeful we’ll see a lot more of this as kids increasingly spend their time in online communities and immersive worlds (more on that in my next post).

That being said, I have to point out that President Bush signed a seriously stupid piece of legislation into law today. While most regular readers know that I fall somewhere in a weird continuum between tree-hugging, Birkenstock-wearing liberal and laissez-faire Libertarian, I also tend to avoid too much in the way of politics on this blog. It generally isn’t the place and tends to irritate the occasional social conservative who happens to wander into education. However, this little law certainly affects kids, what they do online, and how we as educators can help keep them safe.

It also happens to have been written by John McCain who, by his own admission, is not exactly the world’s most computer savvy fella. The law, called the “Keeping the Internet Devoid of Sexual Predators Act of 2008″

shall require that each sex offender provide to the sex offender registry those Internet identifiers the sex offender uses or will use of any type that the Attorney General determines to be appropriate under that Act.

Oh. OK. The whole law can be downloaded here, by the way. The long and the short of it, though, is that sex offenders are supposed to report their email addresses. Then, places like MySpace can check a list of emails when they let people sign up instead of developing new detection tools and employing moderators and schools don’t need to teach kids to be safe online since the government is protecting them so well. It’s probably worth noting (my last political note of the night) that McCain railed against the Illinois legislation noted above, calling it “‘comprehensive sex education’ for kindergarten students”.


Of course, I guess no one expected the sex offenders to simply create a different anonymous email account from the one they report to the registry. Because, after all, it’s pretty hard to get a Gmail account. Ah, for the good ol’ days when you needed an invitation, right?

As Wired puts it,

In other words, to McCain, teaching children to avoid predators is as bad as teaching sexually active teenagers about contraception. But setting up an e-mail database that relies on pedophiles being honest and respectful of the law — well, we can all live with that.


I think I’ll still be keeping a close eye on my kids’ online habits and I won’t be striking Internet safety from our tech curriculum anytime soon. ..Source.. by Christopher Dawson is the technology director for the Athol-Royalston School District in northern Massachusetts. See his full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Read More of Article...

New Web Law May Be 'Worthless,' Watchdog Warns

10-15-2008 National:

Legislation signed by President Bush on Monday that requires sex offenders to provide Internet identifiers to state sex offender registries and tasks the Justice Department with creating a system that lets social networking sites compare their users' identifiers with those provided to a national sex offender registry may not achieve its intended aim of protecting children, according one high-tech policy expert who tracked the bill. That official, Center for Democracy and Technology general counsel John Morris, said Tuesday that the statute may prove "almost entirely worthless" and warned that it may also carry with it serious unintended consequences.

The bill was introduced in January 2007 by Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and John McCain, R-Ariz., now the GOP presidential nominee, and a companion measure was sponsored in the House by Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D. Pomeroy revised and reintroduced his bill after hearing concerns from CDT and other groups, but that version of the bill did not win Senate approval. Instead, the Senate version won out and minor modifications were made to alleviate critics' biggest fears, Morris said, acknowledging that "we have fewer concerns than we once did." Pomeroy's retooled measure would have let probation officers who supervise sex offenders install software on offenders' computers to monitor their Web whereabouts and target supervision to those who actually pose threats to kids.

Nevertheless, Morris believes the new law will not be effective because sex offenders who want to subvert or circumvent their conditions of probation, release or supervision -- which already typically stipulate that they cannot interact with minors -- will forge ahead regardless of the registry requirement. "If they're already intending to violate provisions that apply to them, why wouldn’t they also register a real e-mail and then go create another account," he said in an interview. "It is so trivial to create a new identifier, create a new e-mail address, or social network page. Anyone who is going to pose a risk to minors that this system trying to screen against can easily circumvent it."

CDT is also concerned that the congressionally approved definition of a social networking service is too broad and could "sweep in a great percentage" of blogs, discussion groups and other Internet offerings, he said. Before passing the final version, lawmakers refined the language to exempt many e-commerce sites like Amazon.com that could have unintentionally been covered in previous iterations of the bill by adding a provision that states voluntary compliance would apply to Web sites that whose primary purpose is to facilitate online social interactions.

Furthermore, Morris is worried that even though compliance is voluntary, the long-term impact of the federal government defining social networking could be daunting. "Congress or state legislators might take this new definition from the federal code and try to use it for some regulatory requirement," he warned. "We're increasingly seeing government officials at both the federal and state level pressuring private companies to do things 'voluntarily.'"

Meanwhile, popular social networking site Facebook hailed the legislation's passage and Bush's signing of the measure. The company's privacy chief Chris Kelly said in a blog post that the law "takes an important step in dramatically reducing the opportunities to harm children online." Facebook has long barred registered sex offenders from the service and currently works with individual states' attorneys general to check users against state-registered sex offender lists, he said. But those lists "lack the essential e-mail and IM data" and the process is less efficient and effective than anyone, especially concerned parents, would like, Kelly added.

In response to CDT's concerns, a Facebook spokesman said penalties in the law are severe, as they should be, and the company hopes the statute will be a deterrent. "We’re going to work with law enforcement to identify and prosecute those who aren’t deterred," he said. Facebook plans to add the forthcoming DOJ registry to its existing safeguards and will use the database "as vigorously and comprehensively as we can," Kelly said. Specifically, the site will check new users at sign-up and review existing users as regularly as the technology allows. "Anyone on the list will be prevented from joining Facebook. Anyone already on Facebook who is added to the list will have his or her account disabled forever. End of story," Kelly said.

..Source.. by Congress Daily

Read More of Article...

October 13, 2008

Statement by White House Press Secretary Dana Perino

10-13-2008 National:

On Monday, October 13, 2008, the President signed the following bills into law:

S. 431, the "Keeping the Internet Devoid of Sexual Predators Act of 2008" or the "KIDS Act of 2008," which requires: sex offenders to provide Internet identifiers, including e-mail addresses, to State sex offender registries; and tasks the Justice Department to establish and maintain a system that allows social networking websites to compare Internet identifiers of its users with those provided to the National Sex Offender Registry;

S. 1738, the "PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008," which requires the Department of Justice to create and implement a National Strategy for Child Exploitation, Prevention, and Interdiction; statutorily establishes the existing Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force Program; and makes other amendments to Federal child pornography laws.

S. 3296, which extends through December 29, 2013, the authority of the United States Supreme Court Police to protect court officials off the Supreme Court grounds;

S. 3325, the "Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO IP) Act of 2008," which amends civil and criminal intellectual property laws; establishes the position of an Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator appointed by the President in the Executive Office of the President; and authorizes Justice Department grants to assist in addressing intellectual property theft and infringement crimes;

S. 3477, the "Presidential Historical Records Preservation Act of 2008," which establishes a grant program for the preservation of, and public access to, historical records of former Presidents whose archives are not maintained in Federal archival depositories; and contains various other authorities related to the National Archives and Records Administration;

S. 3536, the "Air Carriage of International Mail Act," which allows the United States Postal Service to negotiate terms for international air mail transportation contracts directly with airlines;

S. 3569, the "Judicial Administration and Technical Amendments Act of 2008," which makes miscellaneous changes to the administration and operation of Federal courts;

S. 3598, the "Drug Trafficking Vessel Interdiction Act of 2008," which prohibits the operation of submersible and semi-submersible vessels which are not registered with any nation;

S. 3605, the "Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008," which extends through January 30, 2010, a pilot program for certain volunteer organizations that serve children to have fingerprint checks on applicants for positions as volunteers or employees processed through the Fingerprint Identification System of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

H.R. 1532, the "Comprehensive Tuberculosis Elimination Act of 2008," which makes changes to Department of Health and Human Services grant programs and activities related to the prevention, elimination, and control of tuberculosis;

H.R. 5350, which authorizes the Department of Commerce to: sell or exchange a property in the City of Norfolk, Virginia; and enter into a land lease with Mobile County, Alabama;

H.R. 5618, the "National Sea Grant College Program Amendments Act of 2008," which authorizes appropriations for the Commerce Department's National Sea Grant College Program for FYs 2009-2014; and makes miscellaneous amendments to statutory provisions related to the National Sea Grant College Program;

H.R. 6199, which designates a facility of the United States Postal Service as the Kenneth Peter Zebrowski Post Office Building;

H.R. 6229, which designates a facility of the United States Postal Service as the Mayor William "Bill" Sandberg Post Office Building;

H.R. 6338, which designates a facility of the United States Postal Service as the Amy SPC Daniel Agami Post Office Building;

H.R. 6849, which permits producers to aggregate base acres and reconstitute farms to avoid the current prohibition on receiving various farm payments when the sum of the base acres of a farm is 10 acres or less;

H.R. 6874, which designates a facility of the United States Postal Service as the Lance Corporal Eric Paul Valdepeñas Post Office Building. ..Source.. by White House Press Secretary

Read More of Article...

September 7, 2008

NJ- NJ lawmaker wants sex offenders to register e-mail

Another lawmakers who refuses to look at the evidence, evidence of who is commiting the Internet sex crimes, it is not former sex offenders, it is new folks who have never before been convicted of a sex crime. When MySpace removed 37,000 sex offender accounts, only one of them had committed an online crime involving a minor. The problems with administrating e-mail addresses are vast like a mountain one has never climbed before. These lawmakers know nothing about the Internet.

9-7-2008 New Jersey:

TRENTON, N.J. - New Jersey sex offenders _ who already must tell state authorities where they live and work _ would be required to divulge their personal e-mail addresses and share their passwords as well, under a proposal sponsored by a lawmaker who represents the district where Megan's Law began.

Assemblywoman Linda Greenstein, D-Mercer, said the new restrictions would allow parole officers to monitor convicted sex offenders' e-mail use.

"Anonymous Internet usage wasn't envisioned when Megan's Law was enacted, but it's now commonplace," Greenstein said. "We have a duty to ensure sex offenders cannot hide behind a secretive user name when hunting for new potential victims."

Greenstein, who is chairwoman of the Assembly Judiciary Committee, has supported other laws restricting sex offenders.

The current bill, A-1554, would extend Megan's Law restrictions on paroled sex offenders, including those under lifetime supervision.

Greenstein represents the central New Jersey district where 7-year-old Megan Kanka was raped and murdered by a neighbor, a convicted sex offender. Megan's parents said they would have warned their daughter had they known about the neighbor. They successfully lobbied for community notification of a sex offender's presence.

Megan's Law, first enacted in New Jersey in 1994 before spreading to other states and federal law, mandates notification whenever a sex offender moves into a neighborhood. Many states publish sex offenders' addresses online.

The current proposal would require anyone under Megan's Law restrictions to register their e-mail addresses and passwords. It also would require offenders to notify the state of any e-mail address changes 10 days before sending or receiving electronic correspondence, and would subject sex offenders under supervision to periodic, unannounced examinations of their computers.

The maximum penalty for those who don't comply would be up to 18 months in jail and a fine of up to $10,000.

The bill has been referred to the Assembly Judiciary Committee. A similar bill in the last legislative session was approved by that committee, but did not advance further.

The New Jersey Legislature adopted a law in January makes it illegal for some registered sex offenders to use the Internet.

The state law restricts Internet use for anyone who used a computer to help commit his original sex crime, such as trying to lure a potential victim with electronic correspondence. The law also may be applied to paroled sex offenders under lifetime supervision, but exempts computer work done as part of a job or search for employment.

The state Parole Board last year also adopted a rule prohibiting sex offenders under their supervision from using the Internet to socialize or use social networking sites. ..News Source.. by ANGELA DELLI SANTI

Read More of Article...