September 21, 2009

OH- Consensual -v- nonconsensual sexual conduct with a minor

9-21-2009 Ohio:

From The Briefcase:

For the crime of sexual misconduct with a minor — having sex with someone who’s between 13 and 15 — consent isn’t at issue. Under the Adam Walsh Act, though, a person convicted of that crime is a sex offender who has to register if the sexual conduct was “non-consensual,” and doesn’t have to register if it was.

So does that mean that a court must conduct a hearing to determine whether the defendant’s conduct was nonconsensual, even if it wasn’t an element of the crime? Yes, says the 9th District in State v. Battistelli (Ohio case).

Uh, guys, there’s another term for nonconsensual sexual conduct with a minor — or with anyone else, for that matter. It’s called “rape.”

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Houston,TX leads the nation in 15 year old unwed mothers, The fathers are probably in prison. At age 15 the parents can't give their consent for marriage.
We have done a darn good job of teaching these little hoochie mamas that they are victims. We must have forgotten to teach them to say NO. This is not going to get any better until the willing victims have to start paying a price for their misconduct.