Monday, December 7, 2009

Why Megan's Law Is Getting An F

12-7-2009 National:

It seems like, every day, there's a story about a child abused by a convicted sex offender, even though there's a federal law that is supposed to keep track of them.

So is there something wrong with Megan's Law?

The Early Show takes a closer look this week in a special series called "Broken Promise." Correspondent Tracy Smith offers the details.

Megan's Law was written with the best of intentions, but a growing body of evidence suggests it may not be living up to its promise.

Megan's law promise as it were was to do one thing, provide the public with the names of former sex offenders living in communities, it didn't even promise to provide addresses this came later. Then, as now, ALL the Megans' laws are, is, a telephone book of names and addresses which show where former offenders (registrants) SLEEP for a few hours of the day. It does not and never intended to show where former offenders are the rest of the day. Far too many people READ-INTO the law OTHER-PROMISES which come from what they think the law should provide. Megans' laws cannot be anything more than a glorified telephone book with pictures.

Mark Lunsford rarely comes home these days.

"I'm just not here," he says. "I'm either at work or I'm out. I don't come home anymore."

The murder of his daughter, 9-year-old Jessica Lunsford, haunts him. Her alleged killer, John Couie, a registered sex offender arrested 24 times, lived right next door to their Florida home.

Lunsford says he believed he lived in a safe neighborhood.

Mark Lundsford didn't even live in the same home as his daughter when she was abducted, he lived with his girlfriend several miles away!

He says, "Maybe a lot of us are just ignorant to it, not knowing that it could happen to any of us."

Six weeks after Jessica was killed, the body of Sarah Lunde, 13, was found. The cops believe she was choked to death by her mother's old boyfriend, also a registered sex offender, also in Florida.

These two horrifying murders direct the public's attention, once again, to the broken promise of Megan's Law.

Asked if Megan's Law worked in the Lunsford case, Florida Citrus County Sheriff Jeff Dawsey says, "Apparently, this guy went undetected into the community. Nobody knew that he was there."

Right here is the falacy of Megan's law: The law shows where an registrant SLEEPS for a few hours of the day, it does not show where the registrant is the rest of the time. During non-sleeping hours a registrant can walk, travel etc. whereever they wish and do so UNDETECTED. Sheriff Dawsey misleads the public with his comment by ignoring the limits of Megan's law (covers SLEEPING HOURS only). Technically ALL REGISTRANTS are UNREGISTERED during non-sleeping hours! The law is nothing more then a harmful joke played on the public by politicians who use it for personal gratification and getting votes to keep them in office.

Megan's Law was named for 7-year-old Megan Kanka, brutally murdered in 1994 by a two-time sex offender who lived directly across the street.

The law requires states to register convicted sex offenders and to notify neighborhoods when offenders move in.

Laura Ahearn says, "The spirit of Megan's Law is, that if a predator moves in next door to you, you will be notified. That's just not the case." Ahearn runs Parents For Megan's Law , a watchdog group that examines how strictly states adhere to the law. She notes, "We did a 50-state survey and what I found is that across the country, most states are failing, so I would give Megan's Law an F."

Ironically, Florida, the home of Jessica Lunsford and Sarah Lunde, received an A+ for its tough guidelines, and still offenders easily got around the law.

Registrants (including John Couey) did not -get around the law- the law cannot control a person's every move, which is the inherent falacy of Megan's law. People choose to SLEEP whenever they wish, most folks have different SLEEPING hours, the law cannot say when a person is to sleep. Therefore, abductions or other crimes can occur at any hour of the day or night, by those registered and by anyone else from the community.

Ahearn says, "We have two tragedies in Florida that demonstrate that Megan's Law is certainly not enough. ..Source.. by CBS News.com

Read More of Article...

West Haven Residents Fight Sex Offender Facility Expansion

12-7-2009 Illinois:

Upon learning that St. Leonard's House--in the 2100 block of West Warren--provides transitional housing for ex-offenders (including convicted rapist, Julius Anderson), Veronica Zepeda and other nearby residents decided to fight back.

Last week, they persuaded Ald. Robert Fioretti (2nd) to put a hold on St. Leonard's plans to buy two city lots to expand its campus. On Wednesday, a lawyer for the two women that Anderson allegedly raped when he walked out of the center earlier this year, filed suit against St. Leonard's and the State of Illinois, arguing that officials should have done more to prevent Anderson's escape.

Fioretti told the Chicago Sun-Times that although St. Leonard's has done a "great job on housing and training of ex-offenders" in the past, the residents of West Haven raised some valid concerns. One of which is that state law requires that any facility housing sex offenders must annually notify neighbors who live within 500 feet that sex offenders live nearby.

Zepeda claims that St. Leonard's never did that. Sex offenders are also not allowed to live within 500 feet of a school, under state law. The Chicago Public Schools' Suder School is right across the street at 2022 W. Washington.

Last week at a meeting arranged by Fioretti's office, St. Leonard's officials told neighbors they would stop taking in sex offenders. "We respect the fact that they're there,'' said Zepeda to the Sun-Times. "We understand their mission. We just do not believe this expansion should happen." ..Source.. Chaicagoist.com

Read More of Article...

Facebook and MySpace delete N.Y. sex offenders

In a earlier article on this issueI questioned whether these were NEW registrants removed after the 90,000 claim of MySpace, this article all but confirms that, the current numbers -for NY- are SINCE the AGs efforts began. Readers need to take notice that, but for the sensationalizing of the issue by the AGs, there is not ONE NEW CASE mentioned of a registrant doing anything wrong with their accounts or with other members of the social networks. This is another of those sounds-good ideas that has no proof that there is a need for such law, as no one is being molested by registrants.
12-7-2009 New York:

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo announced Tuesday that more than 3,500 sex offenders from his state have been purged from Facebook and MySpace.

Both companies have long had policies against registered sex offenders using their services, but the implementation of New York's new Electronic Securing and Targeting of Online Predators Act ("E-Stop") has made it easier for the sites to identify perpetrators from the Empire State.

Facebook, according to Cuomo, was able to identify and disable the accounts of 2,782 registered sex offenders. MySpace deleted 1,796 accounts.

Cuomo has long been concerned about predators on social-networking sites. In January 2008, New York was one of 49 states that entered into an agreement with MySpace that resulted in a set of principles to combat harmful material on MySpace and other sites. In October 2007, Cuomo's office said Facebook could face a consumer fraud charge for misrepresenting the site's safety for minors, but two weeks later Cuomo and Facebook Chief Privacy Officer Chris Kelly held a joint press conference to announce a "cooperative effort."
So far only one registrant has been reported to have contacted a minor on MySpace, and the remainder have been registrants on parole or probation who had some form of Internet restrictions, but none of them had contacted any minor. Excepting the ONE, all other registrants were using the service both legally and properly, and had honestly opened accounts with their correct information. Cuomo's assertions have been smoke and mirrors to sensationalize the eStop law.

The E-Stop law bans many registered offenders from using social-networking sites while on parole or probation and requires all registered offenders to disclose their e-mail addresses, screen names, and "other Internet identifiers." That data is provided to social-networking sites to run against their roles.

The state of New York, according to Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt, "built its database with the idea of social-networking companies running it against their user base." He said the way it was coded, made it a lot easier to find matches. Other states, said Schnitt, "sometimes just fax over a list. Their databases are designed to help people find out if there is a sex offender living on their street. This is a very different use case."

Sex offender data is collected by states and there is no currently official federal database. The federal Adam Walsh act calls for such a database but it hasn't been funded. In 2006, MySpace contracted with Sentinel Safe to build a national and searchable registered sex offender database.

While praising Facebook and MySpace's cooperation, Cuomo said that "many other social-networking sites remain slow at adopting available new protections against sexual predators online." He said his office "sent letters urging them to take action now to similarly purge sex offenders from their sites."

As always, it's important to put this news into perspective. It only involves registered sex offenders, which, of course, is a good start, but it only includes people who have been caught and convicted. And, while the companies do their best to ferret out registered offenders who try to hide their identity, there is no way to know how many people succeed in eluding them.

Also, we know of very few children who have been sexually molested by someone they met on social-networking sites or any Internet sites. The vast majority of child sex abuse victims know the offender from the real world. I'm not aware of any cases of a pre-pubescent child being harmed by someone he or she met online and it's even rare among teens.

And, based on conversations with security officials at social-networking companies, I am not aware of any cases where a registered sex offender has been convicted of using the site to aid in harming a child he or she met on that site.

"There are still zero cases reported of any registered sex offender who was booted off MySpace being prosecuted for illegal contact occurring on MySpace," said Hemanshu Nigam, chief security officer for MySpace parent company News Corp.

In January, the Harvard Law Berkman Center's Internet Safety Technical Task Force issued a report that children and teens are less vulnerable to sexual predators than many had feared, though that report was initially met with some skepticism from some attorneys general. ..Source.. by Larry Magid

Read More of Article...

Scared of Santa? Definitely

12-7-2009 National:

While in the book store the other day, a book seemed to leap off the shelf at me.
It spoke directly to my life, my American experience. It’s a book that depicts a holiday tradition so many of us have shared. It’s called "Scared of Santa: Scenes of Terror in Toyland," by Denise Joyce and Nancy Watkins.

This is a touching photo compilation of that moment when an innocent babe sits upon Santa’s knee, realizes that their parents have handed them off to a white-haired stranger with type-2 diabetes, and responds (rationally, I might add) by screaming bloody murder. I recommend flipping through the pages of "Scared of Santa" as you roast chestnuts.

My own children had moments of abject holiday horror in the local mall. My favorite holiday Santa moment occurred when the only way I could get the picture was to sit on the Jolly Old Elf’s lap while holding my toddler. Said toddler, wailing and red-faced, contorted his body and grasped for some off-camera savior. No help would come. I suppose I could have skipped the photo session but I’d already paid $9.99.

Flip through the pages of "Scared of Santa" and you’ll find children trying to beat Santa back with a candy cane, twins howling in shared rage, or the ever popular crying little brother on one Kringle-Knee while big sister sits on the other Kringle-Knee laughing. Ah, memories.

The fear is to be expected. All year we warn them of stranger danger. And in general it is good policy to avoid men in velvet suits with free candy. But then, once a year we drop this one on them.

"Johnny, this time it’s okay. You’re going to sit on that old man’s knee, he’s going to bounce you a few times, and ask you a few questions. If you answer correctly you’ll be allowed to tell him your secret holiday wish. Now stop crying, it’s your turn."

To avoid the Santa Terrors parenting experts suggest familiarity could help. I read that wearing a Santa hat around the house in advance of the picture might work. This year you also might consider outfitting the child with a surgical mask to minimize the risk of H1N1. Imagine how lovely that picture will look in the holiday frame!

"Scared of Santa" could be the explanation for the scene I wandered into the other day. I was parked in the mall garage. Next to my car was a white van. Behind the wheel of the van was a sleeping Santa Claus. I wanted to snap a picture with my cell phone because Santa sleeping in his van in the mall parking — funny right? It could have been my Christmas card.

But then I thought better of it. The guy was taking a break after a morning of candy cane assaults and temper tantrums. He needed a rest. And really what kind of list do you get on if you wake up Santa while he naps? Naughty for sure. ..Source.. Rebecca Regnier is an award-winning television journalist

Read More of Article...

‘Sexting' turns into Weld County extortion case

12-7-2009 Colorado:

Weld teen learns difficult lesson in texting

The landscape of teen relationships is changing, and as technology grows, so do cyber relationships — and cyber crime.

One Weld County teen learned the hard way this past year as a relationship she started with a California college student after meeting him through the popular MySpace social networking site led to cell phone “sexting.” That led to an exchange of sexual photos and videos and an eventual extortion charge.

On Friday, that man, Geovany Alarcon, now 20, was sentenced to four years in prison. He was accused of threatening to send sexually explicit photos and videos of her to her friends if she did not pay him $1,500. He pleaded guilty in October to sexual exploitation of a child, but he was originally charged with extortion as well.

Court and Weld district attorney officials say this case was not only disturbing by its very nature, but representative of a growing trend with today's technology feeding right into criminal behavior. The relatively new phenomenon of “sexting” — texting with sexually explicit language or photos — is growing across the country. Bullying as a result of sexting is being blamed for at least two teen suicides.

“The days of the note passed in class, check box yes or no, are gone,” said Jennifer Finch, spokeswoman for the Weld District Attorney's office. “It does start out as something flirty or impulsive and not thinking of the consequences. ... People will read this, but think, ‘My kid wouldn't do that.' But it doesn't start with kids sending sexually explicit photos. It's a gradual escalation, and you just go down that slippery slope.”

According to the Associated Press, more than a quarter of young people have been involved in sexting, but many do not know their actions could be criminal. Sending explicit photos over the Internet or through cell phones is legally considered sexual exploitation, in most cases, a felony that could bring with it a lifetime stigma as a sex offender.

“The unfortunate things is when we handle it, we're too late,” said deputy district attorney Anthony Perea, who prosecutes all the sex crimes against children cases for the Weld District Attorney's office, after Alarcon's sentencing Friday. “That's why we're trying to inform parents that they can stop it. When I'm involved, it's too late.”

Alarcon admitted to police to forcing the 17-year-old girl into making sexually explicit videos of herself and demanding $1,500 from her not to distribute the photos. He told police, however, “It was just a joke, I swear.”

Alarcon, 19 at the time, met the girl in August 2008 through MySpace. He was listed as the co-captain of the Delta Sigma Chi fraternity's soccer club through San Jose State University. They exchanged phone numbers and the texting began. As their relationship grew, he requested more photos of her body, and she sent him photos of her in various stages of undress. He then began requesting videos of her performing sexual acts, helped her set up a MySpace to display these videos to entice other men to have sex with her, and eventually he asked her to find a young girl to perform sexual acts with and videotape it.

That request was the last straw, apparently, and the girl decided to end the relationship.

“Once she wanted to terminate the relationship, he became very cruel and demanded extreme acts,” according to a police affidavit of the case. “... She had to make videos for him in order to please him. She was begging him to leave her alone and not send out the photos.”

The girl finally went to her mother, who called police — six months after that relationship began through online flirtations. Though only speaking with him once on the phone, the girl told police she had fallen in love with him and complied with his requests because of that.

Prior to his sentencing, Alarcon told Weld District Court Judge Tom Quammen that he was glad he was caught early, so he couldn't commit any more crimes.

“Not one person will ever be victimized by my hands again, may God and this court be witness,” Alarcon said Friday, after his attorney argued for a community corrections sentence. “My eyes have been ripped open. ... I understand that crimes like mine escalate to crimes that are more serious. I'm thankful I'm here now.”

Quammen said that while he was impressed that Alarcon took responsibility for his crime, the acts, nevertheless, were “very disturbing” and something he could not ignore.

“This crime is particularly serious and troublesome because so much of what happened was for your sexual gratification at the expense of a 17-year-old girl,” Quammen said. “The humiliation you caused her is devastating. Threatening her with having these videos and pictures to be broadcast was not only humiliating to her but for someone of her tender years is particularly devastating. ... This is not the typical texting phenomenon that seems to be in the culture. This went way beyond that.” ..Source.. Sharon Dunn

Read More of Article...

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Wrongful imprisonment leads to $2 million claim

The cost of false accusations: A story that needs to be told and one that sends spouses to prison far to often.
12-6-2009 Alabama:

MONTGOMERY -- A Birmingham woman says her husband died from the stress of being wrongfully imprisoned for the sexual abuse of two young girls, and she wants nearly $2 million in compensation from the state.

The state has already agreed to pay Donna Doyle $129,000, and it has never awarded more than $1 million for a wrongful imprisonment.

But in her view, $129,000 doesn't begin to cover the pain and financial loss that her husband, Robert "Bob" Doyle, endured before his death.

"It's been a long battle. But my faith is still strong," she said.

A legislative committee will soon recommend how much, if any, to add to what the state has already agreed to pay Doyle.

Alabama law provides for $50,000 a year for wrongful incarceration. The Legislature can go above that in special circumstances, but it never has.

"Whatever we do now will be a precedent for the future," said Democratic Sen. Roger Bedford of Russellville, chairman of the Legislative's Wrongful Incarceration Committee.

Robert Doyle was making about $49,000 a year as a salesman for an insurance company in Montgomery before his ex-wife accused him of sexually abusing the two girls. In 1992, a Montgomery jury convicted him of abusing the two, ages 7 and 9, and he was sentenced to 10 years in prison.

He served about two years and seven months before a state appeals court threw out his convictions because the prosecutor had not disclosed to the defense that the girls had accused another man of sexually abusing them. ¶

The appeals court also pointed out that the prosecutor in the case, former Alabama Attorney General Charlie Graddick, had also represented Doyle's ex-wife in their bitter divorce prior to her accusations against him.

Graddick, now a judge in Mobile, said state judicial rules limit public comments by judges, and he would need to consult with state's Judicial Inquiry Commission before making any comment.

Bob Doyle got a Montgomery judge to rule in 2005 that he had been wrongfully incarcerated, but Doyle died of congestive heart failure in 2007 without seeing a dime of compensation from the Legislature.

The Legislature voted in May to give his widow the $50,000 a year authorized by law. It came to $129,041.

She and her legal team told a legislative committee Wednesday that they are requesting an additional $1.86 million to cover legal fees, medical bills, lost wages, and costs for pursuing compensation for wrongful incarceration. ..Source.. al.com



Birmingham widow seeks $2 million for husband's wrongful conviction on abuse charges

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A Birmingham widow says her husband died from the stress of being wrongfully imprisoned for the sexual abuse of his two young daughters, and she wants nearly $2 million in compensation from the state.

The state has already agreed to pay Donna Doyle $129,000, and it has never awarded more than $1 million for a wrongful imprisonment.

But in her view, $129,000 doesn't begin to cover the pain and financial loss that her husband, Robert "Bob" Doyle, endured before his death.

"It's been a long battle. But my faith is still strong," she said.

A legislative committee will soon recommend how much, if any, to add to what the state has already agreed to pay Doyle.

Alabama law provides for $50,000 a year for wrongful incarceration. The Legislature can go above that in special circumstances, but it never has.

"Whatever we do now will be a precedent for the future," said Democratic Sen. Roger Bedford of Russellville, chairman of the Legislative's Wrongful Incarceration Committee.

Robert Doyle was making about $49,000 a year as a salesman for an insurance company in Montgomery before his ex-wife accused him of sexually abusing their daughters. In 1992, a Montgomery jury convicted him of abusing his daughters, ages 7 and 9, and he was sentenced to 10 years in prison.

He served about two years and seven months before a state appeals court threw out his convictions because the prosecutor had not disclosed to the defense that the girls had accused another man of sexually abusing them.

"In the present case, the new evidence casts fundamental doubt on the accuracy and reliability of the proceedings to such as extent that it undermines the entire prosecution and it points unerringly to R.D.'s innocence," the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals ruled.

The appeals court also pointed out that the prosecutor in the case, former Alabama Attorney General Charlie Graddick, had also represented Doyle's ex-wife in their bitter divorce prior to her accusations against him.

Graddick, now a judge in Mobile, said state judicial rules limit public comments by judges, and he would need to consult with state's Judicial Inquiry Commission before making any comment.

Bob Doyle got a Montgomery judge to rule in 2005 that he had been wrongfully incarcerated, but Doyle died of congestive heart failure in 2007 without seeing a dime of compensation from the Legislature.

The Legislature voted in May to give his widow the $50,000 a year authorized by law. It came to $129,041.

She and her legal team told a legislative committee Wednesday that they are requesting an additional $1.86 million to cover legal fees, medical bills, lost wages, and costs for pursuing compensation for wrongful incarceration.

"There is no dispute he was wrongfully incarcerated," Bedford, the committee chairman, said.

"I wish my husband was here to hear that," Donna Doyle said.

Montgomery's district attorney, Ellen Brooks, said Doyle's widow may be due an additional $107,000 to cover her husband's legal bills from his appeal, but the widow is trying to recover for many expenses that are not allowed by state law.

The district attorney said Robert Doyle had heart problems before entering prison and he worsened the problem behind bars because receipts from the prison canteen show he made almost daily purchases of cigarettes and foods high in sugar and salt -- "items that a man in his condition should have avoided."

The committee plans to take a few weeks to consider the case and will make a recommendation to the Legislature in January.

Donna Doyle married her husband after his conviction but before he began his prison sentence. She recalled dropping him off to begin his sentence with nothing more than his Bible. An hour later, he contacted her, asking her to send Bibles to two men he had met in his holding cell.

When he got out of prison, he couldn't return to the insurance business. No one wanted to hire a convicted sex offender -- even one who had been cleared. Instead, he started a ministry program in Birmingham helping ex-felons get schooling and jobs.

His widow continues that ministry today.

"Bob was never bitter, but it has been a struggle for me, knowing what he went through and his untimely death," she said. ..Source.. al.com

Read More of Article...

Saturday, December 5, 2009

News outlets sue to obtain parole records

12-5-2009 California:

SACRAMENTO, Dec. 5 (UPI) -- California corrections officials are being sued for refusing to release information on a man accused of holding a girl hostage for 18 years, authorities said.

Three media companies, The Sacramento Bee, KCRA-TV and the San Francisco Chronicle filed suit Friday in Sacramento Superior Court against the state Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the California Inspector General's Office.

The companies want access to records showing how parole agents supervised Phillip Garrido between 1999 and August, The Bee reported Saturday.

Garrido and his wife Nancy allegedly kidnapped Jaycee Lee Dugard in 1991, when she was 11. The couple, who have pleaded not guilty, were arrested in August after Dugard walked into a parole office with Garrido, a registered sex offender who was on parole for an earlier kidnap and rape case.

A state review found previous parole agents were lax in supervising Garrido.

Friday, corrections spokesman Oscar Hidalgo said his agency could not release the records because of privacy laws related to parolees and because of the ongoing investigation in the Dugard case. ..Source.. UPI

Read More of Article...

When you don't know what's the truth and what's the lie

12-5-2009 National:

Question: My 5-year-old daughter has told us something for 4 1/2 months and now just went back on her word after telling lots of people and police officers about a serious issue. Could she have been holding a lie that long? Is it possible? What do we do? We are freaking out. From: 211, Salem, OR

Hi 211,

This is a tough question for a few reasons, especially the age of your child and the unknown nature of the offense, but the police involvement obviously hints at something serious. For all those reasons, I checked in with three experts on this, David Finkelhor, from the University of New Hampshire, director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center there; Mark Everson, child development specialist and director of the Program on Childhood Trauma and Maltreatment at the University of North Carolina; and a child psychiatrist.

Here's the consensus I gained: The simplest answer is, yes, it is possible for children to maintain something that is false, and also possible for them to retract something that is true.

It is possible, for instance, that a child this age might tell a lie in the heat of the moment for any number of reasons, most likely because he's fearful of punishment. When he sees all the attention it gets him, he might decide, "Hey, all this attention is fun," and embellish, or he could embellish the lie simply because he feels stuck with what he already said and fears even more punishment. Later, including months later, he could get tired of the attention and change his story, or he could change the story because his guilt catches up with him.

Another possibility, Everson says, is that he recants the truth because "the 'cost' of the disclosure is too high in terms of stress on the child, family disruption,
etc. On the other hand, one occasionally sees cases in which what began as
a little lie, often to escape being in trouble or disappointing a parent,
grows into a serious matter which the child may subsequently attempt to
correct."

Everson goes on to say: "The best advice, not knowing more about the case, sounds trite: the child should be evaluated professionally to explore which explanation is most likely true. Does the child have a history of creating false narratives? Is there corroborative evidence to support either of the child's accounts of what happened? The child's recantation should undergo careful
scrutiny, as hopefully the child's original disclosure did."

Everson agrees that that might not be a very satisfactory answer to you at the moment, so let me add a few thoughts, based, again, on the consensus of these experts:

1. The more a child is asked about what is/isn't the truth, the more confused he is likely to get. Especially as time passes, the truth and the lie are likely to blend together so that he doesn't know which is which. The more pressure he feels from adults, the more frantic and frustrated he will feel with himself.

2. Right now for you as parents, presumably the most important reason to know the truth is for your child's safety and, possibly even for the safety of other children. (Again, we don't have many facts here.) But consider that it's also for your child's future well-being. The truth of what happened is more likely to be psychologically damaging to him at different developmental stages in the future if the truth is not uncovered now. So the best reason to give him for trying to tell the truth is this:

"We will love you either way, no matter what is true, but you will feel better if you can tell us what you think is the truth. If you don't want to tell us, it's OK to tell some other adult you trust."

3. Get your child professional help from someone who has experience dealing with these kinds of issues and also experience working with children this age. A clinician is best able to determine fact from fiction because he or she will know the appropriate knowledge for a child of a given age vis a vis a particular issue. Children can't make up what is beyond their base of experience. ..Source.. Barbara F. Meltz

Read More of Article...

State Sen. Nina Turner proposes changes to Ohio sex offender laws

First, as to the police spying into the windows, he is violating the privacy rights of the homeowner -no matter who s/he is- they could be doing something very private.

Additionally, no RSO has to answer the door no matter who knocks on it, some have and have been killed doing so and here. There is no law requiring any homeowner to anser the door when someone comes knocking. If more RSOs would ignore the knock, it would not be long before such verifications would end. If lawmakers make it a law, it would be fun contesting it and show those killed as a reason to not answer the door.

As to the proposed enhancements to the laws, they are nonsense, you can check on someone daily and if they are prone to committing another crime, knocking on their door will not stop them. TRACKING is not PREVENTION of crimes, it is HARASSMENT of the person whose door you knock on. Lawmakers must change their focus, evidence they ignore proves such!
12-5-2009 Ohio:

CLEVELAND, Ohio — Ohio’s most serious sex offenders would be forced to register their addresses more often, and deputies would be required to knock on their doors every 90 days if a new state law is passed.

State Sen. Nina Turner, a Cleveland Democrat, introduced legislation last week to revamp the way Tier III offenders register their addresses and the way deputies track them. She sponsored Senate Bill 217 in the wake of police unearthing 11 decomposing bodies on Anthony Sowell’s property on Imperial Avenue.

Sowell’s neighbors never knew he was a convicted sex offender and questioned why they weren’t notified by the Cuyahoga County Sheriff’s Office about the 15 years he served in prison for attempted rape.

They never knew because Sowell moved into the house after getting out of prison in 2005 - three years before a law took effect that required that neighbors be notified about his past.

Turner believes the monitoring system for Tier III offenders is broken.

"The Imperial Avenue slayings on Cleveland’s East Side are a gruesome reminder of the many cracks that still exist within the system of monitoring the sexual predators who reside in our communities," Turner said in a news release.

"Unfortunately, criminals are able to manipulate these cracks every day. Under the current system, a Tier III sex offender can fulfill their monitoring requirements and still remain largely off the radar."

Ohio was one of the first states to enact legislation in January 2008 to comply with the Adam Walsh Act, a set of federal laws that stiffened registration requirements for convicted sex offenders. States were told to increase registration requirements by 2009 or lose some federal funding.

The act mandated that all states uniformly register sex offenders and place them into a national registry by 2009. It was billed as a way to prevent people who commit sex crimes from slipping through the cracks and committing other offenses.

Turner’s legislation deals mostly with Tier III offenders. Tier III is for the most serious crimes, such as rape or kidnapping a minor. A 2008 law forced those offenders to personally register their address every 90 days.

Deputies are required to perform spot checks every year if the address is unchanged. But if an address changes, the law requires deputies to verify it. Notices are then mailed to every address within a 1,000-foot radius of the offender’s home.

Those guidelines would change under the proposed legislation. These are the key elements:
•Tier III offenders must register their address every 30 days instead of every 90 days. Deputies must confirm the addresses of Tier III offenders every 90 days through face-to-face contact at the offender’s residence and track the outcomes of such visits.

•Deputies must confirm the person’s address through personal contact at the offender’s residence after a Tier III offender initially registers. Sheriff’s offices must notify the community once a year of a Tier III offender address on the anniversary date of the original registration.

•All sex offenders must show a proof of residency (at time of registration, not home visits) similar to those used for voter registration under Ohio election laws.


The legislation doesn’t address how sheriff’s would pay for cost of increased monitoring.

Cuyahoga County Sheriff Bob Reid questions how all sheriffs would pay for the added monitoring. He speculated that it might take three or four additional deputies to perform the tasks in Cuyahoga County but conceded that more enforcement is always better.

"It’s well intended, but there are unfunded mandates," Reid said. "This involves a lot of work. Who pays for that?"

The Buckeye State Sheriff’s Association will not comment until its legislative committee meets Dec. 15, its executive director said.

Mike Rowe, a spokesman for Turner, said the senator is aware of the cost and has asked a state committee to complete a cost analysis of the legislation.

"She is willing to work with the sheriffs on cost," Rowe said. "What is the cost of closing the loopholes? The bottom line is: What is the cost of doing nothing."

The bill will be assigned to a committee this week and hearings could be held early next year. ..Source.. Mark Puente, The Plain Dealer

Read More of Article...

Apology brings closure to Webster defamation suit

Interesting case which shows the differences between the "child abuse registry" and the "sex offender registry." One is known as a "sex offender" only if one is registered in the "sex offender registry," not so if one is registered in the "child abuse registry."

The sex offender registry covers specifically folks convicted of a sex offense, but the child abuse registry covers many different forms of child abuse which may not be sexual in nature, and there is no public registry because also included are folks who have simply been accused of some form of abuse and not convicted of anything.

Apparently there are legal ramifications (defamation of character, and possible damages) to being called a "sex offender" when one is not such. I wonder, should sex offenders look to defamation lawsuits against the state and other public officials when they are called out of their name and likeness to their history? i.e., dangerous, predators, scum, violent predators, etc.
12-5-2009 West Virginia:

CHARLESTON - A month prior to her appointment as the newest Kanawha Circuit judge, a Charleston attorney, and chairwoman of the House of Delegates' Judiciary Committee was able to conclude a defamation suit filed against her by a South Charleston man by apologizing for her erroneous statement.

In July, Richard J. "Christian" Lindroth filed suit against both Webster, and the law firm of Bailey, Bucci and Javins for defamation. In his suit, Lindroth said Webster falsely accused him of being "a registered sex offender."

The registered sex offender reference came in an answer Webster filed on May 15 in the course of representing Lindroth's mother-in-law, Debbie McMillian, in a lawsuit Lindroth and his wife, Angela, filed against McMillian and the state Department of Health and Human Resources. In that suit, the Lindroths accused DHHR, one of its employees, Tamica Tolliver, and the company that operates its child-support collection system, Policy Studies Inc., of improperly withholding $1,269.59 from Angela, and giving it to McMillian while she had custody of Angela's daughter, Mya Shaw, in 2006 and 2007.

Court records show, McMillian was granted temporary custody of Mya, who at the time was 2- years-old, after Christian was charged in July 2006 on one count each of child abuse resulting in injury, child neglect resulting in injury and malicious wounding. As part of plea agreement, Lindroth was sentencing in February 2008 to two years home confinement for unlawful wounding, with credit for time served, and was registered with the State Police's Child Abuse and Neglect Registry."

In answering Lindroth's defamation suit, Webster said the reference to him being as sex offender was not done maliciously, and a motion was made to Judge Jennifer Walker, who's presiding over the Lindroth-DHHR suit, to have the reference expunged. However, citing a prior state Supreme Court ruling, Webster said attorneys, in the course of defending their clients, enjoy an absolute privilege to make defamatory statements so long "as it has some relation to the proceeding."

Before a scheduled hearing on Oct. 30 could be held on both Webster's, and a separate, but similar motion to dismiss McMillian made, the case was dismissed. According to L. Jill McIntyre, attorney for both Webster, and Bailey, Bucci and Javins, Lindroth agreed to dismiss the suit when Webster offered him an apology.

"She acknowledged she made an inadvertent remark about Mr. Lindroth being a sex offender when it should have been about the child abuse registry, and she apologized," said McIntrye speaking on Webster's behalf. "She expressed regret to Mr. Lindroth and he decided he did not want to pursue the case any further."

Records show Judge Irene C. Berger dismissed the case on Oct. 29. Gov. Joe Manchin on Dec. 2 appointed Webster as Berger's replacement following her approval by the U.S. Senate to become a federal district judge.

Prior to her appointment as circuit judge, Webster served for eight years as the lone delegate representing Kanawha County in the 31st House District. Following his election by the House as Speaker in 2007, Rick Thompson, D-Wayne, appointed Webster as judiciary chair.

Because she was appointed prior to January 2010, Webster will have to run in November's general election to fill Berger's unexpired term.

Kanawha Circuit Court, case number 09-C-1217 ..Source.. Lawrence Smith -Kanawha Bureau

Read More of Article...

'Accidental' Download Sending Man To Prison

Where the issue is "downloading with deletion" our court system is corrupt, the court should have stopped the prosecutor from proceeding with the charges in this matter. The evidence is quite clear....and supported by the unrefutted FBI comments.
12-5-2009 National:

SACRAMENTO (CBS13) ― A local man is likely to go to prison for years after he says he accidentally downloaded child pornography onto his computer.

Matthew White, 22, said he was surfing for pornography two years ago on Limewire -- a fire sharing application that allows users to trade music, movies, games and pictures -- when he discovered that some of the files he had downloaded were images of children.

Matt claims he quickly erased the files.

"It didn't appeal to me," he said. "I was looking for women my age, so I just wanted to download 'College Girls Gone Wild' and accidentally downloaded underage pornography."

About a year later, FBI agents showed up at his family's home. The family agreed to let agents examine the computer, and at first, they couldn't find anything.

Investigators later were able to recover the deleted images from deep within the hard drive.

"I asked them, 'Where did you get that? I don't remember that.' I asked them, 'Could I access that if I wanted to?'" Matt said. "They said no."

Facing 20 years in prison for possessing child pornography, Matt is pleading guilty on the advice of his public defender in hopes of getting a three and a half year sentence. He will also serve 10 years probation and have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.

Matt's father says other parents need to be warned about the consequences of stumbling across illicit material.

"One day, you're going to get a knock on the door and have your child taken away for many years," he said.

Matt's court date has been moved to January 8th due to paperwork issues, according to reports.

The FBI could not comment on this specific case, but said if child pornography is ever downloaded accidentally, the user needs to call authorities immediately. They may confiscate your computer, but it's better than the alternative.

I think this case proves, they WILL CHARGE YOU, not simply confiscate computer. Convictions are all that matters to those in the JUST-US system.

Internet searches reveal a large number of complaints from people who say they've accidentally downloaded child pornography through Limewire. ..Source.. Kris Pickel

Read More of Article...

Pending sex offender law would tax sheriff’s office

What is wrong with lawmaker thinking? How could seeing Sowell every 30 days have stopped him from further crimes, or Garrido? The frequency of "home visits" is not a detterent to committing crimes, registrants would simply say hello, yes I live here, and later on commit a crime if they are so driven. TRACKING is a waste of time and has NO PREVENTATIVE value. Study after study shows therapy, jobs and a stable environment reduces future crime!
12-5-2009 Ohio:

JEFFERSON — A pending state law that would require closer scrutiny of Ohio’s most-serious sex offenders would put a big crimp in local law enforcement, said Ashtabula County Sheriff William Johnson.

“They keep putting more work on us but giving us less money and less people,” he said.

At issue is Senate Bill 217, sponsored by State Sen. Nina Turner. The bill takes aim at Tier III sex offenders, the most-serious level.

The proposed measure would require more personal contact between sheriff’s deputies and offenders. For example, offenders would register their addresses every 30 days, and deputies must confirm that information every 90 days with face-to-face contact. Also, deputies must confirm an offender’s address, upon receiving first notice of that address.

The last big upgrade to Ohio’s sex-offenders law came last year to help the state comply with the federal Adam Walsh Act. A 2008 law now requires offenders to register their addresses every 90 days. If an offender moves, the sheriff’s department sends a notice to neighbors living within a 1,000-foot radius.

If the law is enacted, Johnson says the extra face time it requires with offenders could pull deputies away from patrol and administrative duties.

“Mathematically, it could put a real burden on us,” he said.

Of course, the department will comply with any law, Johnson said. However, the personal contact S.B. 217 requires could come at the expense of other duties, he said.

“We do the mandatory things first, and the extra services people have come to expect will be last,” Johnson said. “We have to follow the law.”

Ashtabula County has about 206 offenders in the county who need to keep the county apprised of their location, said Sheriff’s Lt. Terry Moisio Jr., jail administrator. Fifty of them are inmates at the Lake Erie Correctional Institution, he said.

The three tiers of offenders depend on the nature of the crime and the age of the victim, Moisio said.

Turner told Cleveland media the case of suspected serial killer Anthony Sowell prompted the bill. The bodies of 11 women have been found on property occupied by Sowell, a convicted sex offender. ..Source.. MARK TODD - Staff Writer

Read More of Article...

7,500 Youth in Adult Jails -- Young People at Risk of Assault, Suicide; Frequently Held Pre-Trial

12-5-2009 National:

'Jailing Juveniles: The Dangers of Incarcerating Youth in Adult Jails in America' finds that on an average day 7,500 young people are held in adult facilities in the United States, and the yearly rate may be several times higher, resulting in the jailing of tens of thousands of young people.

Washington, DC (Vocus/PRWEB ) December 4, 2009 -– Despite a federal law designed to keep juveniles out of adult jails that has been on the books for over three decades, on any given day, 7,500 youth are in adult jails, according to a report released by the Campaign for Youth Justice.

'Jailing Juveniles: The Dangers of Incarcerating Youth in Adult Jails in America' finds that on an average day 7,500 young people are held in adult facilities in the United States, and the yearly rate may be several times higher, resulting in the jailing of tens of thousands of young people. The report presents research on the characteristics of youth incarcerated in U.S. jails and the risks they face, including:

Sexual Assault. When youth are placed with adults in adult jails, they are at risk of physical and sexual assault. In 2005, 21% of all substantiated victims of inmate-on inmate sexual violence were under eighteen years old, even though youth make up less than 1% of the total jail population.

Suicide. Youth have the highest suicide rates of all inmates in jails. They are 36 times more likely to commit suicide in an adult jail than in a juvenile detention facility, and 19 times more likely to commit suicide in an adult jail than youth in the general population.

Damage to Communities and Public Safety. Jailing juveniles is counterproductive from a community and public safety perspective. New evidence shows that placing youth in the adult criminal justice system increases their likelihood of reoffending. Children who are prosecuted in adult court are more likely to be rearrested more often and more quickly for serious offenses.


'Jailing Juveniles' details how young people are frequently held in adult facilities and exposed to these dangers, even before they’ve had their day in court. Up to one half of all youth transferred to adult court who are held in jail are eventually sent back to the juvenile justice system or not convicted at all. Most youth who are detained in adult jails, but not convicted in adult court will have spent at least one month in an adult jail and one in five of these youth will have spent over six months in an adult jail. Among those youth eventually sentenced to community supervision or given a juvenile sanction, more than 7 out of 10 were held in an adult jail pre-trial.

"We are counting on Congress to fix this 'loophole' in the federal law," says Liz Ryan of the Campaign for Youth Justice. "The law has worked for 35 years to protect youth from the dangers of adult jails and it should be updated to ensure that all children are protected."

'Jailing Juveniles' recommends a number of concrete steps that federal, state, and county policymakers can take to increase public safety while fulfilling their duty to protect youth in the justice system. Core recommendations include:

Congress: Fix the loophole in the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) and extend its “jail removal” core protection for all children, and adequately fund juvenile justice research, data collection and state and county technical assistance programs.

State Legislatures: Promote placement of youth in juvenile justice facilities as an alternative to adult jails for all youth detained pre-trial.

Counties: Initiate results-based “model approaches” to removing youth from jails.

'Jailing Juveniles: The Dangers of Incarcerating Youth in Adult Jails in America' is available on the Campaign for Youth Justice Website, www.campaignforyouthjustice.org. ..Source..

Read More of Article...

Friday, December 4, 2009

Study: A third of child sex offenders are kids

12-4-2009 New Hampshire:

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A University of New Hampshire study finds that more than one-third of those who sexually abuse children are children themselves.

The university’s Crimes Against Research Center analyzed national police data from 2004 for the study, which was published Thursday by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Researchers found that juveniles account for 36 percent of those known to police to have committed sex offenses against children. The juvenile offenders were more likely than adults to offend in groups and at school, and had more male and younger victims.

David Finkelhor, who directed the study, says predators and pedophiles get a lot of attention, but there should be a greater focus on reducing the risk of sexual abuse at the hands of other children. ..Source.. HOLLY RAMER

Read More of Article...

Pastor Offers Sex Offenders A 'Miracle': A New Start

12-4-2009 Florida:

More than 20 states, including Florida, limit where convicted sex offenders can live — keeping them away from schools, parks and other places where children congregate.

In Miami, dozens of homeless sex offenders live under a bridge because there are few, if any, options nearby. But 90 miles away, there's a community dedicated to housing sex offenders.

Where Electronic Monitors Fill The Pews

On a recent Sunday morning, a few dozen men and just a few women gather at a little country church near Pahokee, Fla. They sing, pray and stand up to testify about the importance of God in their lives.

About the only sign that there's something unusual about this church comes when it's time for communion. Many of the men making their way to the altar are wearing ankle bracelets and electronic monitors on their belts.

This is the church at Miracle Park, a community mostly made up of sex offenders. Dick Witherow is their pastor.

Standing at the altar, he challenges the congregation. "How many of you were looking for God when you got saved?" He laughs, "You didn't choose God. He chose us."

Witherow is a tall, spare man, 76 years old, a former private detective.

Shortly after he entered the ministry some 30 years ago, he began working in prisons, holding prayer services and doing addiction counseling.

Then, about a decade ago, he began focusing on sex offenders. After some horrific sex crimes involving children, Florida became one of the first states to pass laws restricting where sex offenders could live after they're released from prison — effectively banning them from some communities.

Ministering To 'Modern-Day Lepers'

Witherow began looking at places where he could open a residential program for sex offenders, which didn't endear him to nearby communities. "I tell people I'm the most popular man in town," he says. "And of course, I'm saying that facetiously."

Witherow believes people can change. At Miracle Park, those on probation attend weekly court-ordered sex therapy sessions. He also offers anger-management classes and sessions on relationships, inner healing and life skills.

Witherow has authored a book about sex offenders called The Modern Day Leper. He says he could have worn the same label as the men at Miracle Park. He was 18 years old when he met his first wife. She was just 14, and before long she was pregnant. A judge allowed them to get married but told Witherow he could have been charged with statutory rape.

"If that would have happened in today's society, I would have been charged with sexual battery on a minor, been given anywhere from 10 to 25 years in prison, plus extended probation time after that, and then been labeled a sex offender," he says.

Witherow knows that there are those who argue that's what should have happened.

'The Cry Was So Loud ... All Over Town'

Witherow once had a ranch for sex offenders in Okeechobee County. But zoning law changes forced that facility to close. His search for another spot brought him here, to a small community he renamed Miracle Park. It's a collection of duplexes about 3 miles east of the town of Pahokee, in rural Palm Beach County.

It's surrounded on every side by sugar cane fields. About 40 of those living there now are sex offenders.

"It's open to everybody," Witherow says. "However, the only ones that are really looking to be out here in the boondocks and pay $100 a week to live with somebody else, basically, are those who don't have anyplace else to go, which are the sex offenders."

Witherow didn't have the $5.5 million the owner wanted for the property. So instead of buying it, he became the property manager. One of his first acts was to let families with children know that a community of sex offenders was moving in, and that they might want to move out.

Most of the families left. Several later sued, saying they were forced from their homes unfairly.

Henry Crawford, the vice mayor of Pahokee, says, "The cry was so loud, man, you could hear it all over town."

On the western edge of Palm Beach County, Pahokee is a poor and mostly black community in one of the nation's wealthiest counties.

Crawford says that because Miracle Park is located outside of the city limits, there wasn't much local officials could do about it. He believes the sex offenders deserve a place to live. He just wishes it wasn't here.

"If this was in other parts of Palm Beach, I don't think this would occur," he says. "But I think the good reverend knew that it wouldn't be much pressure from rural Palm Beach County … not to do this. So the fight was easier here than it would be anywhere else."

Not all the people who had been living in Miracle Park moved out. Stroll through the grounds and you'll run into elderly residents who have lived there for years. Many are former sugar company workers or their relatives.

Barbara Haywood lives there with her daughter and 9-month-old grandson. When she first heard that sex offenders were moving in, she says, she was scared. But not anymore. In her Bahamian accent, she says, "I'm [not] scared any of them because everyone pass, they give me a respect, you know?"

'God Has Forgiven Me Now'

Across the nation, communities are debating where sex offenders can live after they're released from prison. That includes Miami-Dade County, where a colony of sex offenders live under a bridge on the causeway leading to Miami Beach.

Witherow believes shared living arrangements like Miracle Park offer a solution. He says he screens the sex offenders who want to live here. Repeated offenses, burglaries and violent crimes are all red flags. And he says that, as a general rule, he won't accept pedophiles.

But these are still sex offenders, people who in many cases have done terrible things.

The operations manager at Miracle Park is Pat Powers, an efficient, compact man in his 60s. Twenty years ago, he was a racquetball coach who pleaded no contest to molesting 11 of his teen and pre-teen students.

"I was guilty as could be," he says. "Even to this day, there are times where I just feel like, you know, I let people down. But God has forgiven me now, and so now my life is changing."

Shared Space, Self-Policing?

Jill Levenson, an associate professor at Lynn University in Boca Raton, says it's possible that clustering so many sex offenders in one place could increase the risk for nearby communities, like Pahokee. But, she says, research shows that there are also benefits to placing sex offenders in shared living situations like Miracle Park.

She says the sex offenders often begin to police themselves. "If somebody is doing something that's risky," she says, "the others will call him out on that or report that to authorities because, in their mind, if one person goes on and re-offends, that's going to be problematic for everyone else that's living there."

It's been nearly a year since Witherow opened his community of sex offenders at Miracle Park, and financially, things aren't going well. He has used up $300,000 in savings and is running a deficit, in part because many of the sex offenders have been unable to find work and pay their rent.

Ever a man of faith, he says "God will provide."

But in the meantime, he is talking to corrections officials about a whole new group of sex offenders who need housing: senior citizens who have served their sentences and have Social Security but need just one more thing — a place on the outside where they will be allowed to live. ..Source.. Greg Allen

Read More of Article...

Residency Rule Under Scrutiny

12-4-2009 Florida:

Critics say 2006 ordinance increases number of transient predators, offenders.

In September, Edward finished his 10-year sentence on lewd and lascivious assault and walked out of Avon Park Correctional Institution a free man.

Almost.

When Edward gave the Department of Corrections his new address in Winter Haven, he was told it was out of the question. As a sexual predator, he'd have 48 hours to find a suitable location and to register his new address.

He abided by law and registered - as transient. Ninety days later, Edward is still looking.

That is the unintended consequence, counselors and offenders say, of a 2006 county ordinance that expanded residency restrictions for offenders and predators. The ordinance is under renewed scrutiny after the arrest last month of a group of homeless sex predators in Auburndale.

Supporters have said the ordinance is for the protection of the public, but critics say that it's had the opposite effect. It's increased the number of homeless sex predators and offenders, actually increasing the likelihood of further offenses.

"Desperate people do desperate things if they feel like there's no hope," Edward said in a recent interview. He is currently living on-and-off with family in Auburndale. "People can change. They have to want to. But if they're told everyday that they can't, why would they believe that they could?"

Polk County is among several Florida counties that have gone beyond state law to expand restrictions. Now many counties are facing similar challenges, and offenders and those who treat them say county commissioners should rethink the ordinance.

EDWARD'S STORY

By the time he reached 25 years old, Edward, who grew up in Winter Haven, had a wife, five children and a lucrative career running his own car- and motorcycle-detailing business. He also had a long-running addiction to drugs and alcohol.

He was about "as morally bankrupt as you can get" by the time of his first offense in 1996, when he was charged with possessing a photograph that included sexual conduct by a child.

The child was the 14-year-old daughter of a woman with whom he frequently partied and whom he hired for a promotional event. The girl and her mother both wore bikinis to the party and stood by motorcycles while Edward snapped photographs. Everyone was drinking, including the girl. When she began to strip, Edward continued taking pictures.

The second offense occurred in 1999 and involved another 14-year-old, also the daughter of an employee. He had just dropped off the girl's 21-year-old boyfriend when Edward and the girl began to mess around. One thing led to another, and before the situation escalated further, Edward said the girl "flipped out."

"Physically, this wasn't a pubescent child. But she wasn't emotionally or mentally ready to make that decision," he said. She reported the incident and he was charged with lewd and lascivious assault.

Edward spent the next 10 years watching his children grow up in photographs and receiving help for his drug and alcohol abuse. Today, Edward easily admits that his actions were wrong.

He has a support system of friends and family in Polk County who have provided him with food, bathrooms and beds. While he looks for a full-time job and a permanent residence, his sister, brother and nephew watch him closely to ensure he doesn't seek the comfort of alcohol and drugs.

The nearly 50 other homeless offenders in Polk County may not be so lucky.

Those without a support system, he says, are much more likely to fall into old patterns of behavior. And what of the stress of lacking a home, the depression that comes with loneliness and the anxiety of finding and maintaining a job?

Richard Brimer has led court-ordered sex offender treatment groups in Lakeland for more than 20 years.

"These kinds of things are going to make an offender more apt to act out. When an offender lives in a home, not only does he have more stability, he has an address." That also lessens the burden on law enforcement to track them, he says.

Brimer says that county commissioners did not think about the ramifications of the ordinance, and Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd's zero-tolerance approach does not help the problem.

"I could understand his passion to want to rid the community of sex offenders and predators. But it's not realistic. They're going to be among us. They're going to be released from prison, they're going to come back here," he says.

"This isn't about me feeling sorry for predators. It's about me advocating for community safety."

AN EXAMPLE

A group of seven homeless sex predators in Auburndale moved three times in a week before they were arrested in an orange grove Nov. 24 on charges of trespassing, violating their probation and failure to register.

The original tent city off Reynolds Road in Auburndale included 18 offenders, mostly predators, but after the Sheriff's Office told them to move, the group split up.

About seven of them moved to Tropical Moon mobile home park off Old Dixie Highway in Auburndale, where park owner Lori Crump, a former Department of Corrections officer, allowed them to stay temporarily. Because the park is located across the street from a school bus stop, the group was told to move again.

No one in the park, which includes many tenants who are sex offenders, knew where the group could go.

"Predators and offenders live all over the county. I don't want to listen to their whining," Judd said at the time. "They're felons. They're either going to comply or they're going to find a place to live in the Polk County Jail."

On Nov. 22, the group moved to another privately owned citrus grove off Hickory Road in Auburndale. The next day, deputies arrested them for trespassing, among other charges.

Boyd Vonleue just barely missed the arrest. The 47-year-old was living in the tent city off Reynolds Road because he couldn't find a place to live. He finally found an apartment just outside of Lakeland through a friend, who convinced his landlord to allow Vonleue to move in.

"I got lucky," he said. "If it hadn't been for friends, I would probably still be living in a grove."

Vonleue, classified a sexual predator, was released from prison in October after serving more than 15 years for sexual battery on a victim younger than 12. He doesn't want to live elsewhere because he grew up in Polk County and has a support system here. He also works for his brother, who first began the fruitless search for Vonleue about a month before his release.

Vonleue says he intends to fight the ordinance in court.

The part of the ordinance that "hurts the most" is the rule that predators must live at least 1,000 feet away from school bus stops, he said. While the ordinance keeps predators from living nearby, it does little to prevent them from treading near restricted places, he said. That means it's ineffective in preventing wayward offenders from offending again.

"The ordinance doesn't work," he said. "The place I would have been in was a fenced-in area away from any schools and churches. When I lived in the grove, we drove by six bus stops every day on the way to work."

PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

Many predators like Vonleue had the same experience upon their release from prison.

They provided authorities with an address, which they were told violated the Polk County ordinance or state law. Once they were out, they'd have 48 hours to find another home and register.

The process for finding a residence is mainly trial and error. Once an offender has found a potential residence, he or she contacts their probation officer or the Sheriff's Office. The Sheriff's Office plugs the address into a computerized mapping system that shows whether or not it is out of a restricted zone. If it's not, it's back to the drawing board, and the offender must try again.

Although the DOC is allowed to provide offenders and predators with some guidance, both it and the Sheriff's Office say they do not tell offenders where they can live. They're on their own for that.

The DOC admits the ordinance has made finding housing more challenging for offenders. Crump, the former probation officer for the DOC, said the ordinance has also placed an extra burden on law enforcement by making it more difficult to track offenders.

And treatment providers like Brimer say the ordinance ignores the reality of sex offenses - that most are not committed by strangers. In two years of child sexual abuse investigations by the Polk County Sheriff's Office, 94 percent of crimes were committed by suspects the victims knew, like Edward, including family members, friends and acquaintances.

So what are the solutions?

Offenders would like to see a tiered system in Florida that separates offenders into more specific categories, with restrictions based on the individual. Brimer said many counties have proposed other rules in place of certain residency restrictions.

Broward County commissioners appointed the Sexual Offender and Sexual Predator Residence Task Force - a group comprising local officials, experts, scholars and law enforcement - to study the effects of the county's 2,500-foot ordinance.

In an August report, the group suggested 300-foot loitering zones as an alternative to the ordinance. The rule would restrict offenders from loitering or congregating in places heavily populated by children.

Many say they'd also like to see areas designated specifically for sex offender housing, and a more efficient system for finding approved residences.

For offenders, the changes would allow them "to pick up the pieces of their lives and be productive members of society," Edward says. Brimer and Crump agree that more stability for offenders is safer for all.

"If the county could get together and talk about this issue with victim's advocates and law enforcement, we could sit down and come up with a viable option," Brimer said.

The ordinance was passed unanimously in 2006 following a single presentation by Judd. But since the arrests last month, many involved in the debate have contacted county commissioners to renew discussion.

District 4 Commissioner Jean Reed, who was not elected at the time of the commission's vote, said she would be open to that discussion.

"Many children walk half a mile to our schools so I feel the ordinance is reasonable, and probably necessary, for our children's health, safety, and welfare," she wrote in an e-mail to The Ledger.

"However, if there are some unintended consequences that need to be addressed, I certainly am willing to discuss them further." ..Source.. Shoshana Walter, THE LEDGER

Read More of Article...

State is working to meet sex offender guidelines

12-4-2009 Massachusetts:

The state's Sex Offender Registry Board says it is working toward a July 2010 deadline for implementing federal guidelines that would strengthen registration requirements nationwide.

However, questions remain on whether Massachusetts can or should comply with the mandate, though noncompliance could mean a loss of around $1 million in federal crime prevention funding.

Currently, Ohio is the only state that has complied with the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006.

The act creates a national registry and requires states and jurisdictions to meet a minimum set of standards in registering sex offenders and making the information publicly available.

The stricter requirements could prevent more sexual crimes from occurring, said the founder of a sexual assault awareness and advocacy group in Chelmsford.

"There are so many ways in Massachusetts that sex offenders slip though the cracks," said Laurie Myer, founder of Community Voices. "If we comply, it would help us as a state keep track of (sex offenders)."

But state officials this week declined to say what Massachusetts has done, or is doing, to implement SORNA.

"The Massachusetts Sex Offender Registry Board is working toward substantial compliance," said spokesman Charles McDonald.

Implementation falls to that board, under the state's Executive Office of Public Safety. The Attorney General's Office referred questions to that office as well.

SORNA's guidelines call for state registries to collect more extensive registration information, require one to four in-person offender appearances annually for verification, expands a tiered offender classification system and stipulates what offenses require registration and for how long.

It also broadens the availability of sex offender information made public on registry Web sites and otherwise, and creates criminal penalties against offenders who fail to register.

In Massachusetts, sex offenders who must register are classified as Level 1, 2 or 3, based on the risk of re-offending, and in-person appearances at police departments are required annually for Level 2 and 3 sex offenders.

Information is made public online for Level 3 sex offenders only, is available by request at police departments for Level 2 offenders and is not made public for Level 1 offenders.

July 2009 was the original Justice Department deadline for SORNA implementation, however all states were granted an extension to July 27, 2010.

States may also apply for a one-year extension on top of that, by providing information on their implementation efforts, and why the extension is needed.

States that fail to implement SORNA could lose 10 percent of their justice assistance grant funding, which totaled $9.9 million for fiscal year 2009 in Massachusetts.

There is a risk of losing around $1 million yearly for noncompliance, based on the 2009 grant figure, but William Leahy, chief counsel for the state's Committee for Public Counsel Services, said compliance has its costs as well.

Leahy said the state would have to hire more staff and improve technology, among other measures, to comply with SORNA.

In letters sent to Gov. Deval Patrick and Attorney General Martha Coakley in February 2008, Leahy says the state's existing sex offender registration statute already complies with many elements required by SORNA.

Most important, the state cannot comply with SORNA's guidelines for sex offender classification and verification and community notification because it would violate the state constitution, he said.

"The existing sex offender registration and notification act in Massachusetts is consistent with the purpose of SORNA and should constitute substantial compliance with the federal law," Leahy writes.

Yesterday, Leahy said a large majority of states have objections to implementing the standards, while here in Massachusetts state laws are an obstacle.

"There's a clash between the federal regulations and state law," he said. ..Source.. Abby Jordan/Daily News staff

Read More of Article...

Sex offender treatment available, not always mandatory

12-4-2009 Ohio:

CLEVELAND – As the women found dead in and around the home of accused rapist/murderer Anthony Sowell’s home on Imperial Avenue have been identified and laid to rest by their loved ones, many people – particularly women – are left wondering if there are any more men capable of committing such crimes wandering the streets and, if so, how many?

To gain some insight, let’s consider a few already known facts in this case.

One, the accused has a history of rape as he served 15 years in prison after a victim escaped then reported him. Secondly, he was a registered sex offender.

Third, we know he received no treatment while in prison or upon release.

Now, when you examine the Cuyahoga County Sheriff’s Department registry of sex offenders, you’ll find that 2,406 sexual offenders ranging between the three-tiered types of offenses are listed in Cleveland alone. Even Beachwood has 10 while Pepper Pike has one.

Sex offenses include everything from soliciting for sex to rape and, of course, having sex with minors. Tier 1, the lowest, is anything other than a Tier II or Tier III offense.

However, the real questions become: Are there any organizations or support groups to assist men plagued with these kinds of issues as well as what kind of treatment do they receive while in prison? Also, is anyone looking at why people commit such crimes and how to prevent them from recurring?

David Berenson, director of sex offender services for the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation, deals with the institutional programs and providing general information.

During a phone interview with the Call & Post, he explained that the sheriff’s registry is a very straightforward law in that each tier has a list of specific offenses, according to the Ohio Revised Code, for which a sex offender has to register.

For example, rape is a Tier III offense. It could a statutory rape, or a highly violent rape. On the other hand, importuning is a Tier I offense.

“If the offense is rape, that person will register as a Tier III offender,” said Berenson.

He also explained the prison system has two types of treatment: a general and a more comprehensive sex offender program, while making it clear that he refers to males when speaking since the majority of sex offense convictions are attributed to men.

“We have about 9,900 sex offenders incarcerated and 9,750 are male,” he said.

Berenson went on to explain that, when an offender enters the system, they go through the reception process, a unit called the sex offender risk reduction center (SORRC), in Madison Correctional Institution in London, Ohio.

There, the offender receives a risk assessment, which is used nationwide as well as wherever sex offender treatment is provided. After that, offenders are classified into four categories of risk: high, medium high, medium-high, and low.

If an offender scores medium-high or high, the system do a very complete assessment on him and he is identified to go through the comprehensive sex offender education program within three years of his release from the prison system.

“It’s mandatory. They have to go through it,” Berenson said of the 24 sessions, psycho-education form of treatment. “We are basically imparting information about the dynamics of sexual assault, the personality dynamics of sexual assault, and a strong emphasis on victim awareness and victim empathy.”

One of their hopes is to encourage offenders to reach the point where they take ownership of the crime then go on to a more complete sex offender program. “All offenders who score in the medium to high range to sexual re-offend have to go through the mandatory program,” Berenson added.

With the general sex offender program, the timeframe is 12 to 18 months and the offender has to first admit to the offense then choose to enter.

“It’s not something we can mandate them into,” said Berenson. “It’s [what] one would conventionally think of as a sex offender program. It involves a group with a real emphasis on changing the way an offender thinks. In the field, we call it a cognitive-behavioral approach to treatment.”

Generally, it takes 12 to 15 months to complete but Berenson’s seen offenders finish in as little as nine, he said. At the same time, both of these programs, as describe, are constantly being revised since implemented in 2002 or 2003, according to Berenson.

When asked how many sex offenders is released from prison each year, Berenson revealed that he don’t have that figure. He also said he don’t have, as of yet, an outcome study to assess typical results in respects to these two programs.

Additionally, if the offenders successfully complete the mandatory comprehensive program while incarcerated, it is not required that he continue in treatment upon release unless behavioral issues arise. While, in addition to adhering to parole regulations, offenders are only required to register with the sheriff’s department of their residing county.

Berenson didn’t have any information on recidivism rates since these programs were implemented but could discuss general sex offender recidivism.

“Sex offenses is relatively low,” he said, using the basis of a 10-year study of sex offenders who were released in 1989 with an 11 percent recidivism rate. “When we looked at recidivism rates over the last 3 or 4 years, it’s more like 5 to 6 percent. It’s pretty low for sex offenses and that’s replicated nationally,” he said.

He said much of the data on sex offenders, available on Ohio, is replicated across the country while the current numbers have remained constant for at least the past five years.

Dr. Tiffanie Munford-Dent, president of the Ohio Chapter of The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA), said there are a number of sexual offenders treatment providers throughout the state of Ohio but there has to be a willingness to receive these services for treatment to be effective.

“Sex offender treatment decreases the likelihood of additional victims,” she said before talking about how the kind of treatment available depends on the offender. It can include individual, group, and family treatment in addition to community supervision.

She emphasized that being listed on the sexual offender registry is not treatment, as well.

ATSA works to change the attitudes and distorting thinking of the offenders.

According to Munford-Dent, research has shown treatment decreases the likelihood of re-offending since the higher the risk, the more likely they are to re-offend. However, if an offender has served their time, there is no requirement for treatment, she said, although there have been changes in parole requirements over the years.

Courts as well as child protective services refer clients to ATSA while again there are on-going services in the prisons and through parole departments. But, funding for all external counseling services have been cut over recent years.

ASTA receives no support from state.

Additionally, she made it clear that ATSA are not advocates for sex offenders as opposed to a coalition attempting to reduce the occurrences of sexual assaults.

“We don’t want any more victims,” said Munford-Dent. ..Source..Rhonda Crowder, Call & Post

Read More of Article...

Thursday, December 3, 2009

More than 3,500 sex fiends from Facebook, MySpace get boot in crackdown of Internet predators

There is something fishy with AG Cuomo's claim that, these RSOs were removed from Facebook and MySpace recently. i.e., within the past few weeks. Cuomo's claims that the information from the NY Registry was used to remove them, registry information being correct information. That would mean these RSOs setup NEW accounts using their correct information, a second time.

A year or so ago, MySpace claimed it had removed some 90,000 RSOs, they were able to do that because those RSOs used their correct registry information. MySpace compared to the National Registry, which states upload state registries to. MySpace then instituted a procedure to prevent NEW RSOs from signing up with NEW accounts.

Problem with Cuomo's claim today: How come, if Cuomo's RSOs are using their CORRECT information, why was MySpace not able to stop them from setting up NEW accounts after they had been removed last year? The only way this is possible is, if Cuomo's RSOs are really part of the original 90,000 removed last year. Is Cuomo trying to give credit to the eStop law when it really was the MySpace procedure from last year? There may be a few who setup NEW accounts again, but the number claimed by Cuomo?

12-3-2009 New York:


In a major crackdown on Internet predators, more than 3,500 convicted New York sex fiends have been booted from two online social networking sites, sources told the Daily News.

The pervs were kicked off Facebook and MySpace in the first sweep of registered sex offenders under the Electronic Security and Targeting of Online Predators Act (e-STOP), a 2008 law Attorney General Andrew Cuomo aggressively pushed.

"This should really be a wakeup call for everybody, whether it's parents watching what their kids do online, and all the law enforcement groups and authorities, and the sites themselves," one source familiar of the mass Facebook and MySpace purges said.

Laura Ahearn, executive director of Parents for Megan's Law and the Crime Victims Center, said the fact thousands of offenders were dumped proves the law is working.

"Before e-STOP sexual predators freely lurked in social networking sites trolling for innocent victims," she said.

"With e-STOP, Attorney General Cuomo has sent a clear message that there is a new sheriff in the cyberworld protecting our most vulnerable."

Among the major findings of the first sweep:

- Those kicked off Facebook and MySpace in recent weeks include a man convicted of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old boy, another who raped a 2-year-old girl, and a third convicted of sexual misconduct against a 10-year-old girl, sources said.

- Of the 3,533 offenders booted from the sites, 659 were from New York City and 328 from Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester counties.

- MySpace disabled a total of 1,975 accounts linked to 1,796 New York sex offenders over the past few weeks, the sources said.

- Facebook disabled 3,410 accounts linked to 2,782 offenders. There's overlap because some 1,045 registered sex offenders signed up with both sites.

- Of the 8,106 registered sex offenders who reported their online information to the state, 43.5% were either on the Facebook or MySpace networking sites, sources familiar with the situation said.

Under e-STOP, convicted sex offenders forced to register with the state must provide home addresses, e-mail addresses, site usernames, and online profiles as well.

State officials made the information available in the past two months to the social networking sites that want them.

Cuomo wants other networking sites to follow the lead of My-Space and Facebook.

The names of those booted have been sent to the state Division of Parole, which will determine if any of the offenders violated their early release provisions by being on the social networking sites, the sources said.

Out of the nearly 30,000 registered sex offenders in the state, 8,106 have supplied their e-mail addresses and other online information, the state Division of Criminal Justice Services said.

The rest either are back in prison, homeless, don't have computer access, or didn't respond, a DCJS spokesman said.

Sex offenders have 10 days to notify the state after creating new online profiles or face prosecution for a new felony.

Cuomo's office wouldn't comment yesterday, but last year, after the legislation was signed into law, Cuomo noted that "the playground of today is not just on the streetcorner . . . the playground of today is cyberspace." ..Source.. by Kenneth Lovett, DAILY NEWS ALBANY BUREAU CHIEF

Read More of Article...